DR.DAYARAM BHAGWANJI NARNAWRE & 2 OTHERS vs. STATE OF MAHA.THR.ECY.DEPT.OF TRI.DEVP.&3 OTHERS

Case Type: NaN

Date of Judgment: 14-06-2017

Preview image for DR.DAYARAM BHAGWANJI NARNAWRE & 2 OTHERS  vs.  STATE OF MAHA.THR.ECY.DEPT.OF TRI.DEVP.&3 OTHERS

Full Judgment Text

1 wp4198.00.odt
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 4198 OF 2000
1] Dr.Dayaram s/o Bhagwanji Narnawre,
aged about 50 years, Occ. Medical
Practitioner, R/o. Umred,
Distt. Nagpur.
2] Harshal S/o. Dayaram Narnawre,
aged about 17 years, through
father Dr. Dayaram Narnaware,
3] Ujwal s/o Dayaram Narnawre,
aged about 16 years, through
father Dr. Dayaram Narnawre
Petitioners 2 & 3 R/o Umred,
Distt. Nagpur …... PETITIONERS
...VERSUS...
1. State of Maharashtra,
Through its Secretary,
Department of Tribal Development,
Mantralaya, Mumbai.
2. Sub Divisional Officer, Umred,
Distt. Nagpur.
3. The Maharashtra Health University,
through its Registrar,
Nashik, 
4. The Director of Technical Education,
Maharashtra State, Central Building,
Pune,
5. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee,
Giriopeth, Opp. R.T.O. Nagpur …...     RESPONDENTS
::: Uploaded on - 16/06/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 02/06/2024 03:02:12 :::

2 wp4198.00.odt
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Shri S.Sanyal , counsel for Petitioners.
Shri N.S.Rao, AGP for Respondent nos. 1,  2, 4 and 5
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
CORAM: R. K. DESHPANDE, AND
       Mrs. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
th
DATE    : 14        JUNE,  2017 .
ORAL JUDGMENT  (P.C.)
1] The challenge in this petition is to the Government
Resolutions dated 24.04.1985 and 19.06.1985, holding that caste
Mana   shown   in   the   Entry   No.   18   of   "Gond"   in   Constitution
(Scheduled Tribe) Order in relation to the State of Maharashtra is
sub­tribe of "Gond".  The Sub Divisional Officer, Umred, passed an
order on 03.07.2000 holding that the petitioner belonging to Mana
tribe has failed to establish his affinity with "Gond".
2] The   controversy   involved   in   this   petition   no   longer
remains  res­integra  in view of the decisIon of the Apex Court in the
case of   State of Maharashtra and others   vrs.   Mana Adim
Jamat Mandal , reported in  2006 (4) SCC 98 .  The Apex Court has
held that earlier two judgments; one in the case of   Dina   vrs.
Narayan Singh , reported in  (1968) 38 ELR 212  and another in the
case of  Dadaji  vrs. Sukhdeobabu , reported in  (1980) 1 SCC 621
stand impliedly overruled by the decision of the Constitution Bench
::: Uploaded on - 16/06/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 02/06/2024 03:02:12 :::

3 wp4198.00.odt
of the Apex Court in the case of   State of Maharashtra   vrs.
Milind , reported in  2001 (1) SCC 4 . The Government Resolutions
under   challenge   reiterated   the   position   in   the   aforesaid   two
judgments which are overruled.  
3] The   Apex   Court   has   now   held   in   State   of
  that each of the
Maharashtra   vrs. Mana Adim Jamat Mandal
tribes specified in Entry 18 must be deemed to be a separate tribe
and not sub­tribe of “Gond”.   In view of this position, the order
passed by the Sub Divisional Officer holding that the petitioner
belonging to Mana tribe has failed to establish his affinity with
“Gond”   cannot   be   sustained.     The   Scrutiny   Committee   has   to
examine the case of the petitioner for Mana – Scheduled Tribe
category, which is not a sub­tribe of “Gond”.
4] In view of above, writ petition is allowed. The order
dated 03.07.2000 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Umred,
refusing to issue a caste certificate to the petitioner and his sons
showing that they belong to Mana – Scheduled Tribe category is
hereby   quashed   and   set   aside.   The   Sub   Divisional   Officer   is
directed to issue caste certificate to the petitioner and his sons
showing that they belong to Mana – Scheduled Tribe Category.
::: Uploaded on - 16/06/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 02/06/2024 03:02:12 :::

4 wp4198.00.odt
However, these certificates shall obviously be subject to scrutiny
and   verification   by   the   Scheduled   Tribes   Caste   Scrutiny
Committee.  The certificate be issued within a period of one month
from the date of receipt of the order. 
Rule is made absolute in these terms.  No order as to
costs.
      JUDGE JUDGE
Rvjalit
::: Uploaded on - 16/06/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 02/06/2024 03:02:12 :::