KARNIK HARSHADBHAI SHAH vs. PRITI KARNIK SHAH

Case Type: Criminal Appeal

Date of Judgment: 25-10-2010

Preview image for KARNIK HARSHADBHAI SHAH vs. PRITI KARNIK SHAH

Full Judgment Text

CrL.A. OF 2010 @ SLP(CRL.) 5287 OF 2010 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2161 OF 2010 ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO. 5287 OF 2010 KARNIK HARSHADBHAI SHAH ..... APPELLANT VERSUS PRITI KARNIK SHAH & ANR. ..... RESPONDENTS O R D E R 1. Leave granted. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The Family Court rejected the application filed by the respondent-wife for maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code but awarded Rs. 3,000/- per month as interim maintenance to the daughter of the couple. In an appeal taken to the High Court, at the instance of the wife, the High Court has awarded a sum of Rs. 5,000/- per month as interim maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the wife as well. It is this part of the order that has been challenged by the appellant in this appeal. The only reason given by the High Court in awarding a sum of Rs. 5,000/- to the respondent-wife is that the income of the wife was a factor CrL.A. OF 2010 @ SLP(CRL.) 5287 OF 2010 2 which was irrelevant for determining her right to maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. We are of the opinion that this is against the provision aforesaid as the income of the wife is indeed a relevant consideration. We also see from the order of the High Court that it does not give any reasons for overturning the order of the Family Court. We, accordingly, set aside the impugned order insofar as it directs the payment of Rs. 5,000/- per month to the respondent wife. However, payments made to the wife th pursuant to the orders of this Court dated 16 July, 2000 will remain with her. We, further, direct that any other amounts deposited in the High Court shall also be paid to the wife forth with. The parties are directed to appear th before the Family Court on 25 November, 2010, for reconsideration of the matter. 4. The appeal stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ........................... J [HARJIT SINGH BEDI] ........................... J [CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD] NEW DELHI OCTOBER 25, 2010. CrL.A. OF 2010 @ SLP(CRL.) 5287 OF 2010 3