Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 6
PETITIONER:
DAVINDER BATHIA & ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/05/1998
BENCH:
C.B. PATTANAIK, A.P. MISRA
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2734 OF 1991
J U D G M E N T
PATTANAIK, J.
Both these appeals are directed against a common
judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi
dated 7.12.1990 disposing of the two suits filed before the
sub-Judge, Delhi but stood transferred to the Central
Administrative Tribunal in accordance with Section 29 of the
Administrative Tribunal Act. The plaintiffs in both these
suits who are the appellants herein have been working as
Commercial Class-III staff in the Grade of 260 - 430. The
post of Enquiry and Reservation Clerk was in a higher grade
of 330 - 560. The railway administration promoted the
respondents to officiate as Enquiry and Reservation Clerk in
the year 1978, though on ad-hoc basis. The policy of filling
up the post of Reservation Clerk has been changing form time
to time. Prior to 1978, there was no direct recruitment to
the post of Enquiry and Reservation Clerk and people from
commercial side used to be posted as Enquiry and Reservation
Clerk on optional basis by obtaining declarations from the
employees that once they would be absorbed as Reservation
Clerk they would not claim to go back to their original
cadre, namely, commercial side. On the commercial category
direct recruitment was made to the post of Junior
Commercial Clerk in the pay scale of Rs. 260 - 430 and from
that post promotion was being made to the post of Senior
Commercial Clerk in the pay scale of Rs. 330 - 560 from
which cadre a further promotion was available as a Head
Commercial Clerk in scale of pay of Rs. 425 - 640. On the
reservation side, the Junior Commercial Clerks were being
engrafted by way of promotion by obtaining their option and
the declaration as already stated, in the post of
Reservation Clerk having the pay scale of Rs. 330 - 560 and
from the said post further promotion was available as Head
Reservation Clerk. In accordance with the Railway Board’s
Circular dated 29.2.1964, the post of Enquiry-cum-
Reservation Clerk was a selection post required to be filled
up from amongst the staff who volunteered for absorption in
the category from Commercial categories, namely, Ticket
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 6
Collectors, T.T.Es, Goods, Luggage, Parcel and Booking
Clerks with not less than 3 years’ service and in making the
selection, the railway administration was required to take
into consideration the imperative need for having the
Enquiry and Reservation Offices manned by smart persons of
integrity who can maintain good public relations and whose
record of service is unexceptionable. It was also indicated
that there would not be direct recruitment to the posts of
Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerks but once staff from other
commercial categories have offered for selection and have
been drafted as Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerks, they would
seek further promotions in that cadre only. The relevant
portion of the aforesaid circular is extracted hereinbelow
in extenso :
ii) The posts of Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerks in
grade Rs. 100-185 (PS)/150-240(AS) will be
"Selection" posts to be filled from amongst staff
who volunteer for absorption in the category from
Commercial categories, namely, Ticket Collectors,
T.T.Es, Goods, Luggage, Parcels and Booking Clerks
with not less than 3 years service. In making the
selection, the Railway Administrations would, no
doubt, take into consideration the imperative need
for having the Enquiry and Reservation Offices
manned by smart persons of integrity who can
maintain good public relations and whose record of
service is unexceptionable.
iii) There will be no direct recruitment to the posts
of Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerks in the initial
grade Rs. 100-185(PS)/Rs.150-240(AS) but once
staff from other Commercial categories have
offered for selection and have been drafted as
Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerks, they would seek
further promotions in that cadre only. They will,
however, be eligible for higher grade posts of
commercial Inspectors and above in the Commercial
Department along with other eligible staff.
Suitable adjustments in the channels of promotions
may be made as necessary.
iv) For purposes of promotion, all the Enquiry and
Reservation Offices on a particular Railway shall
be considered as one unit.
2. As the cadre is being re-organised it will be
necessary to give the existing staff, an option
either to continue in the re-organised cadre as
above or to return to their parent cadres.
Accordingly, they may be given an option to
indicate their choice. This will not, however,
apply to the direct recruits."
The aforesaid Circular was revised by another circular
dated 5.8.1976 for revitalizing the cadre of Enquiry-cum-
Reservation Clerks and the said circular provided that 25%
of the posts should be filled up by direct recruitment with
the minimum educational qualifications for such recruitment
being graduate. It was also stipulated that the women
candidates should be favourably considered for absorption in
the cadre. The said Circular of 1976 is extracted
hereinbelow in extenso for better appreciation of the point
in issue:
The Board have had under consideration for some
time past the question of revitalizing the cadre of
Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerks and its merger with the
cadre of other Commercial Clerks. After careful
consideration of various factors as well as the general
set up obtaining at the more important Enquiry &
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 3 of 6
Reservation offices on Railways, the Ministry of
Railways have decided as under :-
i) the entire cadre of ECRCs should be Headquarters
controlled. However, the D.Ss may still continue
to order transfer of staff in the lowest grade
(Rs. 150-240 AS) in the normal course within the
division with intimation to Headquarters.
ii) 25% of the posts in the initial scale Rs. 150-240
(AS) 330-560 (RS) should be filled up by direct
recruitment. The minimum educational
qualifications for such recruitment should be
graduation.
iii) Women candidates should be favourably considered
for absorption in the cadre of Enquiry-cum-
Reservation Clerks not only on promotion from
other categories to the initial grade but also in
the proposed recruitment quota.
In 1978, the railway administration took a decision
that the Reservation offices in the four metropolitan cities
of Bombay, Calcutta, Delhi and Madras should constitute a
seniority unit separate from the rest of the Enquiry and
Reservation cadre of the Railway and these units will have
only women employees as Reservation Clerks. The existing
quota of 25% by direct recruitment and 75% by selection from
eligible staff was held not to apply to these units and all
vacancies in the post of Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerk were
required to be filled up by the women staff available with
the railway and then by direct recruitment of women
candidates. The relevant part of the Circular of 1978 is
extracted hereinbelow in extenso:
"Sub: Employment of women as Reservation/Booking
Clerks in the major Booking and Reservation
Offices in Metropolitan Cities.
Please refer to Board’s letter of even number dated
28.4.1978 and confidential letter of even number dated
29.4.1978. The Ministry of Railways have since considered
the points raised at the meeting of Chief Commercial
Superintendents at Bombay on 13/14.6.78 and decided that you
should immediately take action as follows to implement the
Minister’s directive.
(i) The Reservation offices in the four metropolitan
cities of Bombay, Calcutta, Delhi and Madras
should constitute a seniority unit separate from
the rest of the Enquiry and Reservation cadre on
the Railway. It should be made clear that
Government’s intention is to have in this unit
only women employees as Reservation Clerks and in
due course as Supervisors. Male employees who
volunteer to move out will be given full
protection of the pay and grade both substantive
and officiating in a non-fortuitous arrangement.
Subject to vacancies being available they would
also be given choice of the place of posting.
(ii) Existing vacancies of Enquiry & Reservation Clerks
and those likely to arise in the next one year by
normal wastage or transfer of male volunteers,
should be assessed immediately.
(iii) The existing quota of 25% by direct recruitment
and 75% by selection from eligible staff will not
apply to this unit. All vacancies in the initial
grade of Rs. 330-560 may be filled by volunteers
from serving women staff of all categories on the
Railway to the extent suitable candidates are
available and the balance by direct recruitment of
women.
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 4 of 6
(iv) Volunteers from women staff in all categories on
your Railway for working as Enquiry & Reservation
Clerks Gr. 330-560 in the concerned metropolitan
city, should be called immediately (even before
the assessment of vacancies is finished) not later
than 7th July, with last date for receipt of
applications as 17th July. A test should be held
by a Committee of Officers which should be over
and the results made available by 31 st July.
Immediately thereafter they should be given
training for a month (for which arrangements
should be made in advance) from 10.8.78 to 9.9.78
after which they should be posted as Enquiry and
Reservation Clerks and be in position by 15th
September, 1978.
(v) For the balance of vacancies, direct recruitment
may be undertaken by the railway administration by
issue of advertisements with the qualifications as
already prescribed for direct recruitment of
Enquiry and Reservation Clerks i.e., graduates.
This advertisement need not await the selection
mentioned in (ii) above or assessment of
vacancies, but should be immediately issued by 7th
July with last date for applications as 17th July
and selections processed and completed by 31 st
July by which time the vacancy position will be
known. They should be given training for 8 weeks
from 7th August to 23rd September and successful
candidates should be in position in the
Reservation offices by 25.9.1978.
Railways, who have already got panels from the RSC or
are likely to get such panel shortly, should appoint
the women candidates from those panel before resorting
to direct recruitment. It should, however, be ensured
that where the RSC selection has been a continued one,
the men candidates higher in the merit orders are also
accommodated in other Reservation Offices on your
Railway.
(vi) At the moment only the Reservation work will be
entrusted to women Enquiry and Reservation Clerks.
Each Reservation counter would have two staff -
one a woman in charge of Reservation work and a
Booking Clerk to issue tickets as is the procedure
in the Churchgate Reservation Office of the
Western Railway. Booking work in those offices may
continue as at present.
Note : The target dates laid down in (iv) and (v) above
are outer limits. Any Railway Administration which is
able to complete the work earlier, should do so.
The General Manager’s, the CCSs and CPOs should
personally ensure that items (i) to (vi) above are
completed and the Upper and Lower Class Reservations
Offices in the metropolitan cities before 1st October,
1978.
In view of the aforesaid change of policy decision
several women candidates were appointed either by way of
direct recruitment or by promotion from the existing staff,
in super-session the claims of the appellants herein, who by
that date have been continuing on ad hoc basis. Subsequently
these appellants also went through the process of selection
and their services regularised as Enquiry and Reservation
Clerk in the year 1982. But being aggrieved by the
recruitment of the women candidates in the year 1978 on
account of the changed policy decision and as in deciding
the inter se seniority in the cadre of Enquiry-cum-
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 5 of 6
Reservation Clerk the services rendered by the appellants as
Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerks on ad hoc basis had not been
taken into account, they filed the two suits in the court of
sub-ordinate Judge, Delhi which suits were ultimately
transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal under
Section 29 of the Administrative Tribunals Act and the
Tribunal by the impugned decision having rejected the claim
of the appellants, the present appeals have been preferred.
The Tribunal has come to a conclusion that the appointment
of the appellants as Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerks being
purely on ad hoc basis as a stop gap arrangement and thus
appellants not having been appointed as Enquiry-cum-
Reservation Clerks after going through a process of
selection, the period they have served on such stop gap
arrangement cannot be counted for reckoning their seniority
in the cadre of Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerk, and
therefore, the railway administration rightly calculated
their seniority in the cadre from the date the appellants
were regularised as Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerks after
undergoing the process of selection.
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants, Mr.
Anis Suhrawardy in Civil Appeal No. 2734 of 1991 and Mr. BB
Sawhney who gave the written submissions in Civil Appeal No.
2733 of 1991, challenged the decision of the Tribunal on the
ground that the appellants no doubt were appointed as
Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerks on ad hoc basis but they have
been duly recruited as Junior Commercial Clerks through a
process of selection by the Railway Service Selection Board
and they having continued uninterruptedly in the post of
Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerk, there is no justification on
the part of the railway administration to ignore the period
they have served as Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerk on ad hoc
basis prior to their due absorption in 1982 in the cadre of
Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerk. The learned counsel also
urged that while appointing them as Enquiry-cum-Reservation
Clerks, the railway administration having taken their option
that they will not be permitted to go back to the commercial
side and thereafter having appointed as Enquiry-cum-
Reservation Clerk. Gross injustice has been meted out by not
counting their services which they have rendered as Enquiry-
cum-Reservation Clerk on ad hoc basis, inasmuch as their
counter-parts in the commercial side have got accelerated
promotion whereas the appellants are suffering in the
reservation side. Mr. Mahajan, the learned senior counsel
appearing for the railway administration, however,
vehemently contended that the post of Enquiry-cum-
Reservation Clerk being a selection post and the appellants
prior to their selection in 1982 merely having been promoted
on ad hoc basis whereas the women candidates were appointed
by due process of selection in accordance with the changed
circular of the Railway Board of the year 1978, the ad hoc
period of the appellants cannot be taken into account for
reckoning their seniority in the cadre of Enquiry-cum-
Reservation Clerk and in that view of the matter there is no
infirmity with the impugned decision of the Central
Administrative Tribunal.
In view of the rival submissions at the Bar, the only
question that arises for our consideration is : whether the
ad hoc continuance of the appellants in the cadre of
Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerk can be counted for the purpose
of seniority in the cadre, even though, they were regularly
absorbed by a process of selection only in the year 1982?
The answer to this question depends upon the relevant
provisions of the Rules governing the manner of filling up
of the post of Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerk. Undisputedly,
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 6 of 6
the post of Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerk is a selection
post and therefore the railway administration would be
entitled to select competent persons to man the cadre. As it
appears, prior to 1978, 25% of the posts were being filled
up by way of direct recruitment but rests of the 75% were
being filled up by giving promotion to the Junior Commercial
Clerks those of whom wee exercising their option and also
were giving a declaration that they would not revert back to
the direct recruitment by women candidates only. The
appellants, no doubt, have been brought to the reservation
side prior to 1978 but admittedly there had been no process
of selection in their case and they were posted as Enquiry-
cum-Reservation Clerks merely on ad hoc basis as a stop gap
arrangement. The post of Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerk being
a selection pot, the persons like the appellants who were
posted against those posts without going through the process
of selection on ad hoc basis do not have a right to be in
the cadre until and unless they are duly regularised after
going through a process of selection. In the case in hand,
this process of selection was made only in the year 1982 and
the appellants have been absorbed in the cadre of Enquiry-
cum-Reservation Clerks after being duly selected. In this
view of the matter, their continuance on ad hoc basis from
1978 to 1982 cannot be counted for the purpose of their
seniority in the cadre of Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerk nor
can they be held senior to the women candidates who were
directly recruited as Enquiry-cum-Reservation Clerks under
the changed policy by undergoing a process of selection. In
the aforesaid premises, we see no infirmity with the order
of the Tribunal so as to be interfered with by this Court.
The appeals are accordingly dismissed but in the
circumstances there will no order as to costs.