Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 2
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 3221 of 2000
PETITIONER:
P.S.E.B. AND ANR.
RESPONDENT:
WAZIR SINGH
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/03/2002
BENCH:
S. RAJENDRA BABU & K.G. BALAKRISHNAN & P. VENKATARAMA REDDY
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
2002 (2) SCR 380
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJENDRA BABU, J. C.A.No. 3221
of 2000
The respondent brought a suit on the basis of certain instructions issued
by the appellant-Board for absorption of daily-wage workers to work-charged
establishment who had completed 500 days of service. While the Trial Court
did not nave the benefit of the circular, the appellate court did have the
benefit of that circular dated 19.9.1991. The Trial Court, however, decreed
the suit.
In the appeal, the appellate court noticed that the respondent in each of
these cases had completed 500 days as daily-wage worker by the cut-off
date, which had been extended from time to time. Thus it was found that the
respondent in each of the cases was entitled to be absorbed as work-charged
worker. But the appellant-Board had not considered his case while passing
the order impugned in the suit and, therefore, he was entitled to be
absorbed as work-charged worker by conversion from daily wage worker to the
work-charged establishment.
The matter was carried in second appeal to the High Court. The principal
contention put forth before the High Court is that not only the daily wage
worker should have 500 days of service by the cut-off date but also must
continue to be in the service of the Board on the date of issuance of the
circular. The High Court, however, found that mere was no stipulation that
such a daily wage worker should be actually in service on the date of
issuance of the circular and on that basis dismissed the second appeal.
Hence, this appeal by special leave.
The relevant portion of the circular dated 19.9.1991 reads as follows:
"The matter regarding conversion of daily wage workers into work-charge has
been reviewed by the Board and it has been decided that all daily wage
workers who have put in 500 working days in the service of the Board upto
thirteenth September eighty eight [30.9.88] and are continuing in service
of Board shall be eligible to be converted into work-charge workers. These
conversions will be subject to availability of work charge posts and no
further appointments will be made on daily wage basis."
The High Court read the circular only upto the cut-off date and not
thereafter. The latter part, which clearly states "and are continuing in
service of Board" in order to become eligible to be converted into work
charged employees was lost sight of by the High Court. Therefore, it was
held that the sole condition to be fulfilled was that the daily wage worker
should have put in 500 working days upto the cut-off date. That
interpretation will not be correct in the circumstances of the case, when
two conditions had been imposed; firstly that the concerned daily wage
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 2
worker should not only put in 500 working days in service upto the cut-off
date, and secondly, should be in continuous service upto the date of
issuance of the circular in order to become eligible to be converted into
work charged employees. The second aspect could not have been ignored at
all.
The appeal is, therefore, allowed, the order made by the High Court is set
aside and the matter shall stand remitted to the High Court for fresh
consideration on this aspect of the matter with reference to facts arising
in the case.
C.A. Nos. 3223/2000, 3222/2000, 3229/2000 & 3250/2000.
The question raised in each of these appeals is in identical to that of
C.A. No. 3321/2000. Following the said decision and for the reasons stated
therein, these appeals are allowed in the same terms as set forth therein.