Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 5
PETITIONER:
VIKRAM DEO SINGH TOMAR
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF BIHAR
DATE OF JUDGMENT02/08/1988
BENCH:
PATHAK, R.S. (CJ)
BENCH:
PATHAK, R.S. (CJ)
SHARMA, L.M. (J)
OJHA, N.D. (J)
CITATION:
1988 AIR 1782 1988 SCR Supl. (1) 755
1988 SCC Supl. 734 JT 1988 (3) 186
1988 SCALE (2)325
CITATOR INFO :
RF 1991 SC1902 (24)
ACT:
Constitution of India-Art. 21-Right of female inmates
of ‘Care Homes’ established by State to live with human
dignity.
HEADNOTE:
This writ petition arose upon a letter received from a
voluntary organisation alleging that the female inmates of a
‘Care Home’ in Bihar were compelled to live in inhuman
conditions. Pursuant to a direction made by the court, the
District Judge, Patna visited the ‘Care Home’ and submitted
a report on the conditions actually prevailing there.
Disposing of the writ petition,
^
HELD: Every person is entitled to a quality of life
consistent with his human personality. The right to live
with human dignity is the fundamental right of every Indian
citizen under Art. 21 of the Constitution. And, so, in the
discharge of its responsibilities to the people, the State
recognises the need for maintaining establishments for the
care of those unfortunates, both women and children, who are
the castaways of an imperfect social order and for whom,
therefore, of necessity provision must be made for their
protection and welfare. Both common humanity and
considerations of law and order require the State to do so.
To abide by the constitutional standards recognised by well-
accepted principle, it is incumbent upon the State when
assigning women and children to these establishments, to
provide at least the minimum conditions ensuring human
dignity. [758D-F]
India is a welfare State governed by a Constitution
which lays special emphasis on the protection and well-being
of the weaker sections of society and seeks to improve their
economic and social status. It shows a particular ragard for
women and children, and notwithstanding the pervasive ethos
of the doctrine of equality it contemplates special
provision being made for them by law. [758B-C]
What we see before us in the instant case is a crowded
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 5
hovel, in which a large number of human beings have been
thrown together, compelled to subsist in conditions of
animal survival, conditions which
756
blatanly deny their basic humanity. It is clear that the
Welfare Department of the State Government of Bihar views
its responsibilities in regard to these women with a
lightness which ill befits its existence and the public
funds appropriated to it. The name of "Care Home" given to
these establishments is an ironic misnomer. The primitive
conditions in which the inmates are compelled to live shock
the conscience. [758G; 759A-B]
The State Government should provide suitable
alternative accommodation expeditiously for housing the
inmates of the present "Care Home". It is necessary
meanwhile to put the existing building, in which the inmates
are presently housed, into proper order immediately, and for
that purpose to renovate the building and provide sufficient
amenities by way of living room, bathrooms and toilets
within the building, and also to provide adequate water and
electricity. A suitable range of furniture, including Cots
must be provided at once, and an adequate number of blankets
and sheets, besides clothing, must be supplied to the
inmates. The Welfare Department of the State Government will
take immediate steps to comply with these directions. [759D,
F-H]
The inmates have been committed to the care of this
Home under orders issued by various Courts in Bihar or by
different Executive authorities. The Welfare Department will
submit a report within one month from today detailing the
particulars of these cases and mentioning the judicial or
executive authority concerned to the High Court, and the
High Court will thereupon issue necessary instructions to
the pertinent District autority for taking appropriate steps
in the different cases for their early disposal. [760B-C]
JUDGMENT:
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1426
of 1987.
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India).
Ms. Abha Jain for the Petitioner.
M.P. Jha for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
PATHAK, C.J. This writ petition arises upon a letter
received from the Yuva Adhivakta Kalyan Samiti, Sasaram,
District Rohtas (Bihar). Among other things, it is alleged
in the letter that the female inmates of the "Care Home",
Patna (Bihar) are compelled to live in
757
inhuman conditions in an old dilapidated building, that they
are ill-treated, provided food which is both insufficient
and of poor quality, and that no medical attention is
afforded to them. On 18 November, 1987 this Court issued
notice to the Superintendent of the Home, the District
Magistrate, Patna and the State of Bihar and simultaneously
ordered the learned District Judge, Patna to visit the Home
and submit a report on the conditions actually prevailing
there in the context of the allegations contained in the
letter. The learned District Judge has submitted his report.
He states that the "Care Home" is managed by the Welfare
Department of the State Government under the administrative
control of the Deputy Director, Welfare, Patna, that
although there is provision for a full time Superintendent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 3 of 5
no full time Superintendent has been appointed, and instead
the District Welfare officer, Smt. M.B. Verma, who is posted
at Arrah, is in dual charge of the "Care Home". The staff
includes two whole time matrens, two male clerks and two
night Guards and recently three Supervisors have been
attached to the Home. There are three teachers and one
senior Instructress for imparting vocational training. He
points out that thirty inmates recently escaped from the
"Care Home" and now three Home Guards have been posted. His
report discloses a sorry state of affairs. He points out
that the building in which the inmates are housed is a
century old dilapidated house rented for the purpose. The
building is absolutely uninhabitable and unsafe, and during
the rainy season the roof leaks almost at every point. Five
small damp and dirty rooms with no windows are used to
accommodate twenty five inmates, while the remaining women
have to sleep in an open verandah. Only a few of the women
have been provided with blankets and cots. He reports that
whereas the capacity of the "Care Home" is over one hundred,
the Deputy Superintendent admitted before him that there
were only twenty five thin blankets. Most of the inmates
were compelled to sleep on the broken floor without even a
sheet to cover themselves. There was no woollen clothing at
all, nor were they provided with soap or oil. The diet
provided to them cost Rs.5 per day and was hardly adequate
to sustain them. As regards toilet facilities, he says that
there is one municipal tap outside in the open, which also
was not in proper working order. There was acute scarcity of
water. One hand-pump had been installed in the previous
month. Three dilapidated lavatories existed far away from
the main apartment. There was no bathroom or toilet inside
the apartment and the inmates had to go out in the night to
the distant toilets. The report discloses further that the
inmates stated that they were often beaten up in case they
complained before the authorities, and most of them
expressed a desire to be set free to earn their livelihood
or to return to their families. Twelve lunatic inmates
758
had been transferred to the Ranchi Mental Asylum, and eleven
children had been sent to the Bal Bhawan, Deoghar. The
majority of the inmates were major? five of them being deaf
and dumb. All of them were in protective custody by the
order of various judicial and executive magistrates of the
State. There was no regular visit by any physician, the last
visit of a doctor having taken place almost two months
before.
India is a welfare State governed by a Constitution
which holds the pride of place in the hearts of its
citizens. It lays special emphasis on the protection and
well-being of the weaker sections of society and seeks to
improve their economic and social status on the basis of
constitutional guarantees spelled out in its provisions. It
shows a particular regard for women and children, and
notwithstanding the pervasive ethos of the doctrine of
equality it contemplates special provision being made for
them by law. This is only to be expected when an enlightened
constitutional system takes charge of the political and
socio-economic governance of a society, which has for
centuries witnessed the relegation of women to a place far
below their due. We live in an age when this Court has
demonstrated, while interpreting Article 21 of the
Constitution, that every person is entitled to a quality of
life consistent with his human personality. The right to
live with human dignity is the fundamental right of every
Indian citizen. And. so, in the discharge of its
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 4 of 5
responsibilities to the people, the State recognises the
need for maintaining establishments for the care of those
unfortunates, both women and children, who are the castaways
of an imperfect social order and for whom, therefore, of
necessary provision must be made for their protection and
welfare. Both common humanity and considerations of law and
order require the State to do so. To abide by the
constitutional standards recognised by well-accepted
principle, it is incumbent upon the State when assigning
women and children to these establishments, euphemistically
described as "Care Home", to provide at least the minimum
conditions ensuring human dignity. What we see before us in
the instant case is a crowded hovel, in which a large number
of human beings have been thrown together, compelled to
subsist in conditions of animal survival, conditions which
blatantly deny their basic humanity. How else shall we
describe an establishment where women are detained in
miserable conditions, compelling most of them to sleep on
broken floors, in damp and dank conditions, with no covering
whatever to protect them from the chill wind and near
freezing temperatures of the north Indian winter, who are
fed a wretched health-denying diet, are denied the basic
amenities of convenient toilets and a private bathing place,
who,
759
if they complain, are beaten up, and although attacked by
disease and illness are unable to find timely medical
relief. It is clear that the Welfare Department of the State
Government of Bihar views its responsibilities in regard to
these women with a lightness which ill befits its existence
and the public funds appropriated to it. The name of "Care
Home" given to these establishments is an ironic misnomer.
The primitive conditions in which the inmates are compelled
to live shock the conscience.
The counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Welfare
Department of the State Government seeks to minimise and
gloss over the deplorable conditions faced by the inmates,
and the presence of many of the facilities alleged to exist
cannot be accepted in the face of the report of the learned
District Judge. The affidavit, sworn by the Assistant
Director (Social Welfare), does not disclose that he visited
the home personally. The facts seem to have been supplied to
him by others. The report of the learned District Judge, on
the contrary, is the report of an objective neutral observer
who took the trouble of visiting the place himself. We have
every reason to prefer the facts set out in his report.
In the circumstances, we think it necessary to direct
the State Government to provide suitable alternative
accommodation expeditiously for housing the inmates of the
present "Care Home". It is said that the State Government
has given two acres of land near the Ganga bridge at Patna
to the Welfare Department for putting up a complex as a
"Care Home" and for shifting to it such inmates as are also
housed in a Government building. It is stated that the
Welfare Department has sanctioned 31.10 lakhs for
establising a Care Home in the building and that Rs. 12
lakhs have been allocated for constructing the building. We
do not know how long it will take for the new building to be
ready. It is necessary meanwhile to put the existing
building, in which the inmates are presently housed, into
proper order immediately, and for that purpose to renovate
the building and provide sufficient amenities by way of
living rooms, bathrooms and toilets within the building, and
also to provide adequate water and electricity. A suitable
range of furniture including Cots must be provided at once,
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 5 of 5
and an adequate number of blankets and sheets, besides
clothing, must be supplied to the inmates. We note that the
Welfare Department has stated that the allowance of the
inmates is being increased from Rs. 150 per month to Rs. 200
per month and that besides they will be provided such
amenities as Soap, oil and other toilet requisites. The
Welfare Department of the State Government will take
immediate steps to comply with the directions we have framed
for the welfare of the
760
inmates of the Care Home. We direct the Welfare Department
further to appoint a full time Superintendent to take care
of the Home, and to ensure that a Doctor visits the Home
daily.
We are constrained to note also that the inmates have
been committed to the care of this Home under orders issued
by various Courts in Bihar or by different Executive
authorities. The Welfare Department will submit a report
within one month from today detailing the particulars of
these cases and mentioning the judicial or executive
authority concerned to the High Court, and the High Court
will thereupon issue necessary instructions to the pertinent
District authority for taking appropriate steps in the
different cases for their early disposal.
With these directions, we dispose of this Writ
Petition. We make it clear, however, that in the event of
no, or insufficient, compliance being made with this order,
we will have no hesitation in reopening the case for such
further steps as may be considered necessary for enforcing
this order.
H.L.C. Petition disposed of.
761