Full Judgment Text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6856 of 2022
(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No. 920 of 2021)
K. Priyadharshini & Ors. …Appellant(s)
VERSUS
M/s Gammon India Limited & Anr. …Respondent(s)
O R D E R
1. This appeal is of the Claimants which arises out of the
Impugned Judgement dated 30.01.2019 by the High Court of
Madras in an appeal against the order of Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal, Chennai (for short, the “Tribunal”) dated 23.02.2018.
2. The accident occurred on 15.01.2013 when S. Karthikeyan
(hereafter, deceased) was on his motorcycle on the Anna Salai
Road from North to South Direction. The vehicle being driven by
S. Karthikeyan, crashed with a crane, belonging to Respondent
No. 1 which was duly insured with Respondent No. 2 which
resulted in grievous injuries to the body of the deceased. He was
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
NIRMALA NEGI
Date: 2022.10.15
12:25:48 IST
Reason:
taken to the hospital but he succumbed to his injuries. The claim
petition was filed on behalf of the Appellants. The High Court as
well as the Tribunal were of the opinion that the accident had
occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the crane
belonging to Respondent No.1. The liability to pay compensation
was fixed on the Respondent No. 2 and accordingly the Claimants
were awarded Rs. 21,34,000/- by the MACT with interest at the
rate of 7.5% per annum.
3. An appeal was filed against the order of the MACT to the High
Court for enhancement of compensation. The High Court
increased the compensation payable to Rs. 86,07,840/- along with
7.5 % interest per annum by accepting that Income Tax Return
documents could be validly relied upon to calculate the ‘Average
Annual Income’ of the deceased, however, the High Court did not
award any amount on Future Prospects as has been laid down in
the case of National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi
and Ors. (2017 (16) SCC 680).
4. We think that the High Court, though, has been correct to the
extent of enhancing the compensation in the facts and
circumstances of the case, however, the Future Prospects
awarded by the MACT at 40% was rightly awarded and should
have been upheld by the High Court. Consequently, we
enhance the compensation awarded to the deceased to
Rs.1,06,71,710/- along with 7.5% rate of interest per annum from
the date of the filing of the petition till the date of realization.
Accordingly, we direct enhancement of the compensation as per
the following table: -
| Particulars | Amount |
|---|---|
| Income after tax of the deceased for<br>the years 2013-2014 | Rs. 6,65,823/- |
| Future Prospects | 40% |
| Personal Expenses | 1/4th |
| Multiplier | 15 |
| Loss of Consortium | Rs. 40,000/- |
| Loss of Love and Affection | Rs. 1,00,000/- |
| Loss of Estate | Rs. 15,000/- |
| Transportation Expenses | Rs. 15,000/- |
| Funeral Expenses | Rs. 15,000/- |
| Total | Rs. 1,06,71,710/- |
shall also stand disposed of in the above terms.
.…….............................J.
[HEMANT GUPTA]
.…….............................J.
[SUDHANSHU DHULIA]
New Delhi,
September 22, 2022