Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 4
PETITIONER:
S.K. PARAMASIVAM ETC.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
GOVERNMENT. OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/01/1998
BENCH:
S.P. BHARUCHA, V.N. KHARE
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
With
C.A.No.4466
J U D G M E N T
BHARUCHA, J.
These appeals by special leave impugn the judgment and
order of the High Court at madras dismissing the writ
petitions filed by the present appellants, along with other
similar writ petitions, and giving certain directions (with
which we are not immediately concerned).
For the purposes of appreciating what is involved,
certain provisions of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Act, 1983
and the Rules and Bye-laws made thereunder need to be cited.
Section 21 of the said Act prescribed the qualifications for
membership of a co-operative society. What is relevant is
that the individual or registered society or the body of
persons referred to in items (i), (ii) and iv) thereof shall
posses such further qualifications as may be specified in
the Rules or the Bye-laws. Section 23 sets out the
disqualifications for membership of a society. Among hem is
the following:
"does not possess the
qualification, with reference to
the principle object of the
society, proscribed the rules or
the bye-laws".
Section 26 related to the votes of members, Under sub-
section (1) clause (a) there of, no member of a registered
society shall have more than one vote in the afraid of the
society, and clause @ reads thus:
"@ Save as otherwise provided under
this Act and the rules, no member
of a registered society shall be
derived of his right to vote in the
election of the members of the
board of such society."
Section 170 empowers the State Government, in the public
interest, by general or special order whether prospectively
or retrospectively, to exempt any registered society from
any of the provisions of the Act (except some provisions
with which we are not here concerned) or of the Rules,
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 4
subject to such conditions as may be specified. Rule 14 of
the Rules made under the Act empowers the Registrar to
classify and categorize societies into the classes therein
mentioned, according to the principal object provided in the
bye-laws thereof. The 6th class thereunder is "Dairy
Society" and this class has 5 categories, namely, Milk
Producers Society, Milk Consumers Society, Milk Supply
Society, Milk Supply Union and Dairy Farm. Rule 51A provides
for the eligibility of members to vote at, or stand for,
elections.
It reads thus:
"Notwithstanding anything contained
in the bye-laws of a society, the
members who are not otherwise
disqualified to vote at, or stand
for, any election n accordance with
the provisions of the Act or these
rules, shall be eligible to vote
at, or stand for, any election to
the society."
Bye-law 5, specifically applicable to Milk Producers Co-
operative Societies, upon which reliance is placed by the
appellants, reads thus:
"Bye-law 5(1) (a). Any person who
is residing in the area within the
jurisdiction of the Society, wh is
above 18 years of age, who is
competent to enter into a contract,
who is a genuine milk producer, who
undertakes to sell the milk
produced by him through the
society, is eligible to become a
member.
(b) The application of wrecking a
member is to be approved by the
Board of Directors of the Society.
(Rejection of applications should
strictly be under the provisions f
the Co-operative Societies Act).
@ The person should not be a milk
vendor or a vendor of milk
products.
(ii) Any member who had supplied
less than 300 liters of milk or
supplied milk for less than 120
days in the preceding co-operative
years, will not be entitled to any
rights, other than pecuniary rights
such as bonus, dividend, etc."
On 26th April, 1990, the State Government issued a
Government Order which provided that for participating in an
election to a Milk Producers Co-operative Society, a member
should have suppled minimum quantity of 300 liters of milk,
or should have supplied milk for a minimum period of 120
days, in the previous co-operative year. On 10th September,
1990, another Government Order was issued. The earlier G.O.
was referred to therein as having been issued to exempt all
Milk Producers Co-operative Societies from the provisions
of Rule 51A. The later order amended the earlier order so
that what was now provided read:
"Notwithstanding anything contained
in the bye-laws of the Primary Milk
Producers’ Co-operative Society,
the members who are no otherwise
disqualified to vote at, or stand
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 3 of 4
for, any election in accordance
with the provisions of the Act or
the rules, thereunder and who have
suppled milk to the society for 120
days or 300 liters during the
period commencing from the date of
commencement of the preceding co-
operative year and ending on the
date 30 days prior to the date of
election shall be eligible to vote
at or stand for, any election to
the society."
On 27th September, 1966, G.O.Ms.166, which was impugned in
the writ petitions, was issued. It read thus:
"ORDER :
In the order second red above,
Government in supersession of the
orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.226,
Animal Husbandry and Fisheries,
Dated 26.4.1990 have ordered that
notwithstanding anything contained
in the bye-laws of the primary Milk
Producers’ Co-operative Societies,
the Members who are not otherwise
disqualified to vote at, or stand
for, any election in accordance
with the provision of the Act or
the Rules thereunder and who have
supplied Milk to the Society for
120 days or 300 liters during the
period commencing from the date of
commencement of the preceding Co-
operative Year and ending on that
date 3 days prior to the date of
election shall be eligible to vote
at or stand for a election to the
society.
2. In the order third red above,
Government have issued an election
schedule to complete the election
process to the Co-operative since a
number of representation have ben
received to rescind the exemption
grant in the order second red above
so that all the members as
contemplated in Rule 51A are made
eligible to vote at or stand for
any election to the society.
3. Government after consideration
have decided to remove the
conditions imposed in the
Government order second read above.
Accordingly, Government order
second read above shall be
concealed with effect from the date
of issue of this order. The effect
of this order is that all the
Members of the Primary Dairy Co-
operative Societies, who satisfy
the conditions of rule 51A of the
Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies
Rules 1988 shall be eligible to
vote at or stand for any election
to the society. (BY ORDER OF THE
GOVERNOR).
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 4 of 4
Sd./-
M.RAMAN
Secretary to Government."
It was contended on behalf of the appellants that
Section 21 had to be read with Bye-law 5 so that, to vote at
an election, a member must have supplied not less than 300
liters of milk or supplied milk for 120 days, in the
preceding co-operative year and that, therefore, the
impugned Government Order was contrary to the requirements
and had in law.
We are here concerned with the right of persons or
pates who are already members to vote. It is Section 26 of
the Act and Rule 51A of the Rules which are relevant. Sub-
section (1), clause @ of Section 26 states that no member of
a registered society shall be deprived of is right to vote
in the election of the member of the board of such society,
"save as otherwise provided under this Act". To deprive a
member of his right to vote, therefore, the Act has to be
looked at and no provision of the Act has been pointed out
by reason of which a member can be deprived of is right to
vote. Rule 51A states that all members of a society shall be
eligible to vote at an election to the society, unless there
wise disqualified. it is not the case of the appellants that
any disqualification attaches to certain members, for the
provisions the appellants rely upon do not prescribe
conditions which disqualify members from voting. These
provisions, namely, Section 21 and bye-law 5, deal
principally, with qualification for the purposes of
membership and cannot be determinative of the right of those
who are already members to vote. Sub-clause (2) of bye-law 5
speaks if general terms of "any rights, other than pecuniary
rights", it is difficult to read this general provision in
the by-laws as prevailing over the specific provisions
dealing with the right members to vote in the Act and the
Rules made thereunder.
The earlier G.O.Ms. were issued under the provisions of
Section 170 of the Act, which has been quoted above. There
is nothing which prevents the State Government in law from
issuing the impugned Government Order Rescinding the
exemption that was given earlier.
It was contended that a letter of understanding had
been signed by the State Government and the national Dairy
Development board on 3rd march, 1988, by reason of which the
earlier Government orders had been issued, that the impugned
Government order was contrary to that understanding, that
the said board had informed that State Government that its
decision to issue the impugned Government order would be
detrimental to the interests of milk producers and set back
to the operation Flood programme in the State, and that the
said board, which was a party respondent in some of the
other writ petitions, had filed an affidavit in support f
the writ petitions. The breach of understanding, if any,
between the said board and the State Government is a matter
for the said board to take up and cannot furnish a ground to
the appellants.
The appeals are dismissed, no order as to costs.