Full Judgment Text
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC:7399
CRL.A No. 231 of 2015
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
TH
DATED THIS THE 9 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.231 OF 2015 (A)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT ROOPA
W/O JAGADEESHA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
ND
R/AT NO.8, 2 CROSS
BALAJI NIVAS, CHURCH STREET
KAVERINGARA
MURUGESHPALYA
BENGALURU-560017
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. G SURESH., ADVOCATE
SRI VASANTHAPPA., ADVOCATE (NOC))
AND:
1. SRI BASAVALINGAPPA BHUMAR
S/O LATE SHANKARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
WORKING AT B E M L
BADGE NO.R-721-17119
NEW THIPPASNADRA
BENGALURU-560075
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SUNDAR RAJ., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by
SHARADAVANI
B
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUEDGMENT DATED 20.1.2015,
PASSED BY THE XIV ACMM, BENGALURU, IN
C.C.NO.26273/2012 - ACQUITTING THE
RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I.
ACT.
- 2 -
NC: 2026:KHC:7399
CRL.A No. 231 of 2015
HC-KAR
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. This appeal is filed by the
appellant/complainant being aggrieved by the judgment of
acquittal dated 20.01.2015 passed in C.C No.26273/2012
by the XIV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore
(for short "the trial Court").
2. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
CELESTIUM FINANCIAL v. A GNANASEKARAN ETC.
N INE
reported in 2025 SCC O L SC 1320, at paragraph 10 of
the judgment, has observed as under:
" 10. As already noted, the proviso to Section 372
of Cr.P.C. was inserted in the statue book only
with effect from 31.12.2009. The object and
reason for such insertion must be realised and
must be given its full effect to by a court. In view
of the aforesaid discussion, we hold that the
victim of an offence has the right to prefer an
appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of Cr.
P.C., irrespective of whether he is a complainant
- 3 -
NC: 2026:KHC:7399
CRL.A No. 231 of 2015
HC-KAR
or not. Even if the victim of an offence is a
complainant, he can still proceed under the
proviso to Section 372 and need not advert to
sub-section (4) of Section 378 of Cr. P.C. "
3. In the light of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's
recent clarification of the legal position, it is now evident
that the appellant, being the complainant under Section
138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is also entitled
to file an appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed
by the trial Court before the Sessions Court, since he is
considered to be a victim. If this Court were to proceed to
hear and decide the appeal at this stage, it could deprive
the parties of an available forum, i.e. this Court, for
further challenge.
4. Similar view has been taken by the High Court
of Andhra Pradesh in CHARBEL INDIA V. STATE OF
ANDHRA PRADESH reported in 2025 SCC O N L INE AP 2815;
by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in MANORAMA
KANKANE v. NARENDRA KUMAR SHUKLA rendered in
rd
Criminal Appeal No.5910 of 2025 decided on 03 July,
- 4 -
NC: 2026:KHC:7399
CRL.A No. 231 of 2015
HC-KAR
2025; and in the case of LATE KISAN SEWA KENDRA v.
PRITAM SINGH reported in 2025 SCC O N L INE MP 4818;
and in SMT. URMIT MADRAH v. SAMARPAN JAIN rendered
st
Criminal Appeal No. 11872 of 2022 decided on 21 July,
2025; the decision of High Court of Chattisgarh in NEELAM
SAHU v. NARADNAGWANSHI rendered in ACQA No. 340 of
th
2018 decided on 16 July, 2025; and in SMT. KIRTI
KURIAN v. AJAY SINGH rendered in ACQA No. 198 of 2019
th
decided on 16 July, 2025; the judgment of this Court in
the case of SIDAGONDAPPA v. SHAFI AHAMAD rendered in
st
CRL.A. No. 20021/2018 decided on 31 July, 2025 and in
SRI T.H. LENKAPPA v. SRI SANJAY AND ANOTHER
rendered in Criminal Appeal No.146 of 2015 decided on
rd
23 July, 2025; the decision of High Court of Delhi in the
case of D.K. ASSOCIATES v. SHANKAR AND ANOTHER
rendered in Criminal Appeal No.694 of 2016 decided on
th
13 November, 2025 and the decision rendered by the Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/S. ANANYA
ENTERPRISES v. SRI G.S. GOPALAKRISHNA rendered in
th
Criminal Appeal No.100171 of 2016 decided on 24
- 5 -
NC: 2026:KHC:7399
CRL.A No. 231 of 2015
HC-KAR
November, 2025. An overall assessment of the aforestated
decisions reveals that the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of CELESTIUM FINANCIAL (supra) has
been relied upon by this Court, as well as other High
Courts across the country.
5. Considering the above, it is deemed fit that the
present appeal be transferred to the concerned appellate
Court of Sessions and be considered as an appeal under
the proviso to Section 413 of BNSS, 2023 (formerly
Section 372 of Cr.P.C) and numbered accordingly.
Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following:
O R D E R
i. Registry is directed to transfer the entire
record of the case, including the
requisitioned copies of the trial court
Records, to the concerned Principal District
& Sessions Judge, who may assign it to the
concerned Appellate Court having the
jurisdiction and for which purpose, it would
be listed before the Principal District &
Sessions Judge;
- 6 -
NC: 2026:KHC:7399
CRL.A No. 231 of 2015
HC-KAR
ii. The concerned transferee court is directed
to issue Court notice to both the parties to
appear before the concerned Court, and the
concerned Court, thereafter, shall proceed
with the case in accordance with law;
iii. In case there are applications pending for
condonation of delay or any other pending
applications, the same also be transferred
to be considered by the learned Judge of
transferee Court, in accordance with law;
iv. Considering the matter has been pending
for considerable time, the Appellate Court
is requested to make an endeavour to
dispose of the matter as expeditiously as
possible;
v. The appellant is permitted to carry out
necessary amendment in the cause-title
and also the provisions thereof;
vi. It is made clear that this Court has not
made any observations as to the merits of
the case and all rights and contentions of
the parties are left open to be agitated
before the Court concerned.
- 7 -
NC: 2026:KHC:7399
CRL.A No. 231 of 2015
HC-KAR
6. In the light of the above observation and
directions, appeal stands disposed of.
Sd/-
(G BASAVARAJA)
JUDGE
PKN
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2