Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 4
PETITIONER:
BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMN. & ANR.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22/11/1996
BENCH:
K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
J U D G E M E N T
PATTANAIK, J.
Leave granted.
This appeal by special leave is directed against the
judgement of the Patna High Court dated 26th September, 1994
passed in CWJC No. 379 of 1993.
The short facts of the case are that the Bihar State
Subordinate Services Selection Board was constituted by the
Government of Bihar on 20th April, 1981 for selecting
candidates and recommending their names to various posts in
class-III in various departments of the Government. On 13th
May, 1987 the said Selection Board issued an advertisement
inviting applications from eligible candidates is the
prescribed proforma and the last date for receipt of the
applications was 6th June, 1987. The Board conducted a
written examination on 27/28th February, 1988 and the result
of the written exhumation was announced on 7th April, 1991.
Candidates were required to appear for physical test on 21st
April, 1991. A list of 199 successful candidates was placed
on the Notice Board on 17th May, 1991. Out of the said list
names of 26 persons were recommended for being appointed as
Assistant Jailor to the Inspector General, prisons on 17th
July, 1991. The Government of Bihar issued a resolution on
22nd October, 1991 deciding to abolish the Subordinate
Service Selection Board and the job of the Subordinate
Services Selection Board was entrusted to Bihar Public
Service Commission. It was however, indicated in the said
resolution that the examination which has already been
conducted by the Board, the result thereof will be published
by 27th February, 1992 and thereafter, all personnels and
assets of the Board shall be deemed to have been transferred
to Bihar Public Service Commission. On 6th December, 1991 on
the recommendation of the Service Selection Board 11 persons
were appointed as Assistant Jailor and again on 20th
December, 1991, 4 persons were appointed to the said post of
Assistant Jailor. The Service Selection Board published a
revised list of successful candidates containing 238
candidates on 28th February, 1992. The government of Bihar
in the Personnel & Administrative Reforms Department found
that while recommending the names for appointment, the
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 4
Service Selection Board is not adhering to the roaster point
and, therefore, under the order of the Government the
Inspector General of prisons wrote a letter to the Service
Selection Board on 29th February, 1991 requesting the Board
to recommend 8 Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
candidates for being appointed as Assistant Jailors. The
Board recommended 15 candidates by its letter dated 4th
March, 1992 but the said recommendation did not contain the
names of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes persons. The
respondent’s name was included in the said list submitted on
the 4th March, 1992. The Inspector General of prisons by
this letter dated 8th May, 1992 did not act upon the said
list and again requested the Board to send Scheduled Castes
and Scheduled Tribes candidates. As the respondent could not
be appointed, he filed a writ petition in the High Court
alleging therein that persons securing less marks and
occupying position below him have been appointed else where
and yet he has not been appointed and, therefore, sought for
issuance of a writ of mandamus. By the impugned order the
High Court having directed the Public Service Commission and
the State to consider the case of the respondent for
appointment against a vacant post of Assistant Jailor or any
other equivalent post, the present appeal has been
preferred.
During the pendency of the writ petition filed by the
respondent, in another proceeding registered as CWJC No.
1412 of 1992 several allegations of favourtism and nepotism
having been made against the Service Selection Board, a
Bench of the Patna High Court had appointed Shri S.N.
Biswas, Commissioner & Secretary to the Government,
Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms to
enquire into the correctness of the allegations made
pertaining to the examination conducted by the Bihar State
Service Selection Board and submit a report to the court.
Said Shri S.N. Biswas pursuant to the aforesaid order of the
High Court enquired into the matter and submitted a report
which clearly indicated gross irregularities committed by
the Subordinate Service Selection Board in conducting test
pursuant to the advertisement issued on 13th May, 1987 and
recommending names for being appointed to different posts in
class-III under the Bihar Government. It is indeed
surprising to note that the Subordinate Service Selection
Board even though was dissolved by the Government of Bihar
with effect from 22nd October, 1991, Yet in February 1992
the Board published a revised list of 238 persons. Shri S.N.
Biswas, the Commissioner appointed by the High Court
ultimately came to the conclusion that no credence should be
given to the examination and subsequent actions of the Board
and recommended cancellation of the result of the
examination and for filling up the vacancies by issuing a
fresh advertisement and holding a fresh examination. On the
basis of the aforesaid report and considering rival
submissions of the parties the Patna High Court in CWJC No.
7141 of 1991 came to conclusion as under:
From the report of Sh. Biswas there
cannot be any doubt whatsoever that
a great deal of bungling had been
done by the officers of the State
of Bihar. It is really surprising
as to how the State of Bihar had
been tolerating such Officers and
as to why the services of all such
persons who had illegally been
appointed had not been terminated.
The said writ application was ultimately disposed of
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 3 of 4
with the direction that the State should immediately take
remedial measures by cancelling the result of the
examination for which three merit lists had been prepared
and by filling up the vacancies by fresh advertisement and
upon taking a fresh examination. Notwithstanding the
aforesaid judgement of the Patna High Court dated 23rd
March, 1994 passed in CWJC No. 7141 of 1991, by the impugned
judgement dated 26th September, 1994 the writ application
was allowed solely on the ground that some persons lower in
the rank than the respondent had been appointed.
Mr. L.R. Singh the learned counsel appearing for the
appellants contented that in view of the irregularities
pointed out by the Biswas Committee no court could issue a
mandamus for giving appointment to an applicant from the
recommendations made by the Subordinate Service Selection
Board as that would tantamount to legalising and accepting
the gross irregularities and illegalities committed by the
Service Selection Board in the matter of selection of
persons. He further contended that the Service Selection
Board having been dissolved on 22nd October, 1991, the said
board had no jurisdiction to send fresh recommendations on
4th March, 1992 containing the name of the respondent and,
therefore, the said list submitted by Service Selection
Board could not have conferred any right of appointment upon
the respondent. Lastly, he submitted that the Inspector
General of Prisons having requested the Board to recomend 8
Scheduled Castes and 8 Scheduled Tribes candidates as the
Board had not followed the roaster while recommending
earlier, the Board could not have sent a list of the
respondent and, therefore, no enforceable right can be said
to have been conferred upon the respondent for being
appointed. Mr. Sharan, learned counsel appearing for the
respondent on the other hand contented that no credence
should be given to the said report of Shri S.N. Biswas as he
had been indicated by the High Court in some other case. He
also submitted that when persons junior to the respondent in
the list submitted by the Service Selection Board have
already been appointed and the State’s special Leave
petition against the similar order has been dismissed by
this Court, the present appeal should also be dismissed.
Having given our anxious consideration to the rival
contentions of the parties and on carefully examining the
materials on record we find sufficient force in the
contentions raised by the learned counsel for the appellant
and we are unable to agree with the submissions of Mr.
Saran, the learned counsel for the respondent. True it is,
this court did not entertain a special leave petition on
September 5, 1994 when State of Bihar had challenged an
order of the Patna High Court. But it is crystal clear that
when the Court did not entertain the special leave petition,
the report of Shri Biswas had not been brought to the notice
of the Court nor the Court was aware of the gross
irregularities and illegalities committed by the Subordinate
Service Selection Board in the matter of making selections
and recommending names for different posts in class-III. We
have no doubt in our mind that if the irregularities and
illegalities found by Shri Biswas would have been placed
before the Court, the Court would not have hesitated in
entertaining the matter and cancelling the list altogether.
Be that as it may, we are of the considered opinion that the
High Court committed gross error of law is issuing the
mandamus requiring the Public Service Commission and the
State to give appointment to the respondent even after going
through the Biswas Committee report which in no uncertain
terms indicates the gross irregularities and illegalities
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 4 of 4
committed by the Service Selection Board in the matter of
holding the examination and drawing the list of successful
candidates. Further the Board having been abolished by the
Government decision dated 22nd October, 1991 had no further
jurisdiction to publish a revised list of 238 persons on
28th February, 1992 and in recommending 15 candidates on 4th
March, 1992 including the respondent. The said list of 15
persons containing the respondent’s name recommended on 4th
March, 1992 is a list wholly without jurisdiction and the
persons recommended thereunder including the respondent had
no enforceable right for which a mandamus could have been
issued by the High Court. In the aforesaid premises, we set
aside the impugned order of the Patna High Court and the
writ petition filed by the respondent stands dismissed. We
also further direct that the Bihar Public Service Commission
need not take any further act upon the lists prepared by the
State Service Selection Board or recommend any names for
different posts in class-III from three lists. But so far
as the appointments already made from out of the said lists,
since in several cases appointments have been made pursuant
to the orders of the court and in some cases those orders
have not been interfered with by this Court though not being
aware of the illegalities and irregularities in the matter
of conducting the examination and we are not annulling the
appointments already made. But so far as respondent No. 5
Shri Krishna Singh Vimal is concerned, though he has be
appointed by the Government of Bihar by letter dated 30th
May, 1995, but the said appointment had been made because of
the impugned direction of the Patna High Court in CWJC No.
379 of 1993 and it was specifically indicated in the letter
of appointment that the appointment would be subject to the
decision of the Supreme Court in the special leave petition
filed by the Bihar Public Service Commission. In this view
of the matter the appointment of said respondent No. 5 makes
a fresh application to the Bihar Public Service Commission
pursuant to any advertisement and is found to be overaged
then the period which the respondent has spent in pursuing
the present litigation should be excluded by the Public
Service Commission. This appeal is allowed with the
aforesaid directions and observations but in the
circumstances there will be no order as to costs.