Shivaji vs Parwatibai
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Case type
- Civil Appeal
- Decided on
- 26-11-2024
<pre> <b>NON-REPORTABLE</b>
2024 INSC 917
<b> IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</b>
<b> CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION</b>
<b>CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). </b> <b>@ SLP(C) No.12996/2022</b>
<b>SHIVAJI</b> <b> </b> <b>APPELLANT(S)</b>
<b> VERSUS</b>
<b>PARWATIBAI & ORS.</b> <b>RESPONDENT(S)</b>
<b>J U D G M E N T</b>
<b>B.R. GAVAI, J.</b>
<b>1.</b> <b>Leave granted.</b>
<b>2.</b> <b>This appeal deserves to be allowed on the short ground</b>
<b>that the second appeal, wherein the present appellant was</b>
<b>Respondent No.2, was decided even without giving notice to</b>
<b>the appellant herein.</b>
<b>3.</b> <b>Shri Atul Babasaheb Dakh, learned counsel further</b>
<b>submits that even the questions of law which were framed by</b>
<b>the learned Trial Judge were framed during the dictation of</b>
<b>the order and the appellant herein did not have an</b>
<b>opportunity of being heard.</b>
<b>4.</b> <b>Such a practice by the High Court is deprecated by a</b>
<b>recent judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Suresh</b>
Signature Not Verified
<b>Lataruji Ramteke v. Sau. Sumanbai Pandurang Petkar and</b>
Digitally signed by
NARENDRA PRASAD
Date: 2024.11.30
16:05:51 IST
Reason:
<b>Others, reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1210.</b>
1
<b>5.</b> <b>The impugned order is, therefore, set aside and the</b>
<b>matter is remitted back to the High Court for deciding it</b>
<b>afresh in accordance with law.</b>
<b>6.</b> <b>Since the appeal arises out of a suit filed in the year</b>
<b>2009, we request the High Court to decide the appeal</b>
<b>expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year from</b>
<b>today.</b>
<b>7.</b> <b>The appeal is, accordingly, allowed.</b>
<b>8.</b> <b>Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.</b>
<b>..............................J</b>
<b>( B.R. GAVAI )</b>
<b>..............................J</b>
<b>( K.V. VISWANATHAN ) </b>
<b>NEW DELHI;</b> <b> </b>
<b>NOVEMBER 26, 2024</b>
2
<b>ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.2 SECTION IX</b>
<b> S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A</b>
<b> RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS</b>
<b>Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12996/2022</b>
<b>[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-04-2022</b>
<b>in SA No. 515/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay</b>
<b>at Aurangabad]</b>
<b>SHIVAJI Petitioner(s)</b>
<b> VERSUS</b>
<b>PARWATIBAI & ORS. Respondent(s)</b>
<b>(IA No. 103195/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED </b>
<b>JUDGMENT, IA No. 103197/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)</b>
<b> </b>
<b>Date : 26-11-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today.</b>
<b>CORAM : </b>
<b> HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI</b>
<b> HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN</b>
<b>For Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Babasaheb Dakh, AOR</b>
<b> Mr. Diganta Gogoi, Adv.</b>
<b> Mr. Bitu Kumar Singh, Adv.</b>
<b> Mr. Praveen Kumar Pandey, Adv.</b>
<b> </b>
<b>For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudhanshu Chaudhari, Sr. Adv.</b>
<b> Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR</b>
<b> Mr. Shreyas Gacche, Adv.</b>
<b> UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following</b>
<b> O R D E R</b>
<b>1.</b> <b>Leave granted.</b>
<b>2.</b> <b>The appeal is allowed, in terms of the signed judgment.</b>
<b>(NARENDRA PRASAD) (ANU BHALLA)</b>
<b> DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER </b>
<b>(Signed “Non-Reportable” judgment is placed on the file)</b>
3</pre>
2024 INSC 917
<b> IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</b>
<b> CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION</b>
<b>CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). </b> <b>@ SLP(C) No.12996/2022</b>
<b>SHIVAJI</b> <b> </b> <b>APPELLANT(S)</b>
<b> VERSUS</b>
<b>PARWATIBAI & ORS.</b> <b>RESPONDENT(S)</b>
<b>J U D G M E N T</b>
<b>B.R. GAVAI, J.</b>
<b>1.</b> <b>Leave granted.</b>
<b>2.</b> <b>This appeal deserves to be allowed on the short ground</b>
<b>that the second appeal, wherein the present appellant was</b>
<b>Respondent No.2, was decided even without giving notice to</b>
<b>the appellant herein.</b>
<b>3.</b> <b>Shri Atul Babasaheb Dakh, learned counsel further</b>
<b>submits that even the questions of law which were framed by</b>
<b>the learned Trial Judge were framed during the dictation of</b>
<b>the order and the appellant herein did not have an</b>
<b>opportunity of being heard.</b>
<b>4.</b> <b>Such a practice by the High Court is deprecated by a</b>
<b>recent judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Suresh</b>
Signature Not Verified
<b>Lataruji Ramteke v. Sau. Sumanbai Pandurang Petkar and</b>
Digitally signed by
NARENDRA PRASAD
Date: 2024.11.30
16:05:51 IST
Reason:
<b>Others, reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1210.</b>
1
<b>5.</b> <b>The impugned order is, therefore, set aside and the</b>
<b>matter is remitted back to the High Court for deciding it</b>
<b>afresh in accordance with law.</b>
<b>6.</b> <b>Since the appeal arises out of a suit filed in the year</b>
<b>2009, we request the High Court to decide the appeal</b>
<b>expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year from</b>
<b>today.</b>
<b>7.</b> <b>The appeal is, accordingly, allowed.</b>
<b>8.</b> <b>Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.</b>
<b>..............................J</b>
<b>( B.R. GAVAI )</b>
<b>..............................J</b>
<b>( K.V. VISWANATHAN ) </b>
<b>NEW DELHI;</b> <b> </b>
<b>NOVEMBER 26, 2024</b>
2
<b>ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.2 SECTION IX</b>
<b> S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A</b>
<b> RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS</b>
<b>Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12996/2022</b>
<b>[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-04-2022</b>
<b>in SA No. 515/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay</b>
<b>at Aurangabad]</b>
<b>SHIVAJI Petitioner(s)</b>
<b> VERSUS</b>
<b>PARWATIBAI & ORS. Respondent(s)</b>
<b>(IA No. 103195/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED </b>
<b>JUDGMENT, IA No. 103197/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)</b>
<b> </b>
<b>Date : 26-11-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today.</b>
<b>CORAM : </b>
<b> HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI</b>
<b> HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN</b>
<b>For Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Babasaheb Dakh, AOR</b>
<b> Mr. Diganta Gogoi, Adv.</b>
<b> Mr. Bitu Kumar Singh, Adv.</b>
<b> Mr. Praveen Kumar Pandey, Adv.</b>
<b> </b>
<b>For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudhanshu Chaudhari, Sr. Adv.</b>
<b> Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR</b>
<b> Mr. Shreyas Gacche, Adv.</b>
<b> UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following</b>
<b> O R D E R</b>
<b>1.</b> <b>Leave granted.</b>
<b>2.</b> <b>The appeal is allowed, in terms of the signed judgment.</b>
<b>(NARENDRA PRASAD) (ANU BHALLA)</b>
<b> DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER </b>
<b>(Signed “Non-Reportable” judgment is placed on the file)</b>
3</pre>