Full Judgment Text
| Mr. Sushant Singh, Mr. Sourav | |
|---|---|
| Pattanaik, Ms. Shruti Gupta & Mr. | |
| Piyush Kumar, Advs. (M. | |
| 7978900270) |
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. This is a cancellation petition under Section 50 of the Copyright Act,
1957 seeking rectification of the copyright registration bearing no.
‘ A-79261/2007’ (‘impugned registration’) registered in favour of
Respondent-M.G. Food Products/Mr. Shankar Lal Dhingra, Mr. Nandlal
Dhingra, Mr. Shyamlal Dhingra and Mrs. Kavita Makkar. The impugned
registration is in the name of Respondent-M.G. Products/M.G. Food
Products. The bibliographical details of the impugned registration is as
follows:
| Title of the work | MG SUPER MINT LIQUID FILLED GUM (LABEL) |
|---|---|
| Type of work | Artistic Work |
| ROC No. | A-79261/2007 |
| Date | 21st May, 2007 |
Signature Not Verified
C.O.(COMM.IPD-CR) 752/2022 Page 1 of 4
Digitally Signed
By:DHIRENDER KUMAR
Signing Date:21.11.2023
16:36:44
| Applicant Name | M/s. M.G. Products |
|---|---|
| Author Name | Shri Shankarlal Dhingra |
3. The ld. Counsel submits that the Petitioners i.e., Petitioner No.
1-Perfetti Van Melle SpA & Petitioner No. 2-Perfetti Van Melle India Pvt.
Ltd. had in fact filed a civil suit bearing CS(OS) No. 513 of 2009 titled
‘Perfetti Van Melle v. Mr. Shankar Lal Dhingra’ against the
Respondent/Defendant No.1-Mr. Shankarlal Dhingra- the author of the
impugned registration. Further, the said suit has been decreed vide order
dated 26th April, 2013. The relevant portion of the said order reads as under:
“On 9th March, 2011, present matter was referred to
the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation
Centre. The mediation in the present case was
successful through the efforts of Ms. Manjusha
Wadhwa, Advocate- Mediator. A Settlement Agreement
dated 31st October, 2012 has been executed between
the plaintiffs and remaining defendants.
This Court is satisfied that the compromise between the
parties contained in the aforesaid Settlement
Agreement satisfies the requirements of Order 23 Rule
3 CPC. The compromise contained in the aforesaid
Settlement Agreement is lawful and therefore, this
Court does not find any impediment in decreeing the
suit in terms of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement.
It is pertinent to mention that the Supreme Court in
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Cherian Varkey
Construction Co. (P) Ltd., (2010) 8 SCC 24 while
dealing with Section 89 of the CPC observed that the
settlement agreement will have to be placed before the
Court for recording it and disposing of the suit in its
terms and the Court should apply the principle of
Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC and make a decree in
terms of the settlement in regard to the subject matter
Signature Not Verified
C.O.(COMM.IPD-CR) 752/2022 Page 2 of 4
Digitally Signed
By:DHIRENDER KUMAR
Signing Date:21.11.2023
16:36:44
of the suit, to make such settlement effective.
Consequently, present suit is decreed in terms of
aforesaid Settlement Agreement dated 31st October,
2012 in particular its paras 6 and 7(a) to (e). Registry
is directed to prepare a decree sheet in terms thereof.
Plaintiff is granted liberty to file an application under
Section 16 of Court-Fees Act. With the aforesaid
observations, present suit stands disposed of.”
4. As per the above order, the parties had entered into a settlement
agreement dated 31st October 2012 under the aegis of the Delhi High Court
Mediation and Conciliation Centre. In the said settlement agreement, the
Respondent/Defendants had agreed for the cancellation of the impugned
registration.
5. A copy of the settlement agreement dated 31st October, 2012 has
been handed over to the Court which was entered between the Petitioner and
Mr. Shankarlal Dhingra, who is the proprietor / partner of M.G.
Products/M.G. Food Products. The relevant clauses of the said settlement
agreement read as under:
“7. The following settlement has been arrived at
between the parties hereto.
a) That the Defendant will not use the earlier label but
would maintain the registration No. 1478550 in class 30
so that the new application for the label can be
registered in association with the earlier registration.
The Plaintiff will not oppose or object to the new
registration applications of the Defendant of the
trademark “SUPER MINT” either under Trade Mark Act
1999 or Copyright Act, 1957.
b) That the Defendant agrees to cancellation of the
Copyright NO. 79261/07 and seek fresh registration of
its label annexed as Annexure A. The Plaintiff will have
no objection to the same.
c) That the Defendants agree and undertake that it shall
Signature Not Verified
C.O.(COMM.IPD-CR) 752/2022 Page 3 of 4
Digitally Signed
By:DHIRENDER KUMAR
Signing Date:21.11.2023
16:36:44
not, either directly or through its partner, successors,
heirs, and agents, apply for registration of any label
mark, device packaging, wrapper which is identical or
deceptively similar to the labels / wrappers and trade
dress of the plaintiff’s CENTER FRESH which is
annexed as Annexure B.
d) The Defendants will exhaust their existing stocks lying
with them till 31.01.2023. This undertaking would be
thus valid from 01.02.2023.
e) The Plaintiff gives up all relief including damages,
rendition of account etc. as claimed in the present Suit.”
6. In terms of the above settlement agreement, the Respondent agreed to
discontinue using their prior label for the label mark ‘SUPER MINT’.
Additionally, the Respondent agreed to apply for cancellation of the
impugned registration.
7. In view of the fact that the suit itself has been decreed and the
settlement agreement is part of the said decree, the present copyright
registration no longer deserves to continue on the Register of Copyrights.
The impugned registration bearing no. A-79261/2007 shall stand cancelled,
and shall accordingly be expunged from the Register of Copyrights in terms
of Section 50 of the Copyright Act, 1957.
8. The necessary change in the Register of Copyrights shall be carried
within four weeks and shall be reflected on the website.
9. The Registry is directed to supply a copy of the present order to the
office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trademarks of India
on the e-mail: llc-ipo@gov.in for compliance of this order.
10. The present petition is disposed of in the above terms.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
NOVEMBER 20, 2023/ Rahul/dn
Signature Not Verified
C.O.(COMM.IPD-CR) 752/2022 Page 4 of 4
Digitally Signed
By:DHIRENDER KUMAR
Signing Date:21.11.2023
16:36:44