Full Judgment Text
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9603 OF 2016
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 8835 OF 2016 ]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant(s)
VERSUS
PRAMA BHANDARI & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9604 OF 2016
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 10617 OF 2016 ]
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
C.A. No. 9603 of 2016 (@ SLP (C) No. 8835/2016)
1. Leave granted.
JUDGMENT
2. The issue, in principle, is covered against
the appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No.
8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave
Petition (C) No. 8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal
No. 5811 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave
Petition (C) No. 21545 of 2015.
3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
1
Page 1
4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of
this case, the appellant is given a period of
one year to exercise its liberty granted under
Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation
and Transparency in Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for
initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.
5. We make it clear that in case no fresh
acquisition proceedings are initiated within the
said period of one year from today by issuing a
Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the
appellant, if in possession, shall return the
physical possession of the land to the original
land owner.
6. However, we make it clear that this Judgment
shall have no bearing on the dispute, which is
JUDGMENT
now pending before the High Court in CS(OS)No.
1607 of 2003 and CS(OS)No. 1772 of 2003, which
shall be disposed of by the High Court on their
own merits.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed
of.
No costs.
2
Page 2
C.A. No. 9604 of 2016 (@ SLP (C) No. 10617/2016)
Leave granted.
In view of the Judgment passed in
C.A.No.9603 of 2016 (@ SLP (C) No. 8835/2016), as
above, this appeal is dismissed.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed
of.
No costs.
.......................J.
[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
.......................J.
[ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ]
New Delhi;
September 22, 2016.
JUDGMENT
3
Page 3