Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 3
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 5095 of 2006
PETITIONER:
M/s. Wheels India Ltd
RESPONDENT:
Shanker Lal & Anr
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17/11/2006
BENCH:
Dr. AR. LAKSHMANAN & ALTAMAS KABIR
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
(@ SLP(C) No. 15838 of 2005)
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5096 OF 2006
(@ SLP(C) No. 15848 of 2005)
Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.
Leave granted. Heard both sides.
The appellant in these appeals are M/s. Wheels India Ltd.
and the respondents, namely, Shanker Lal and Om Prakash
are employees of the appellant. Notice was ordered in these
matters on 16.8.2005. During the pendency of the
proceedings in this Court, both the respondents-workmen
in these appeals have amicably settled the disputes with
the Management. The settlement and the receipts issued
by the respective workmen were placed before the Assistant
Labour Commissioner, District Panchayat Premises, Court
Road, Moradabad. The various issues and the terms
arrived at the settlement are as under:
"Statement of the Dispute
Due to the failure of Conciliation between M/s
Whels India Ltd. Tada Badali, Rampur and
Workman Shri Om Prakash S/o Shri Ghasiram,
before the Conciliation Officer regarding the
dispute of termination of the services vide letter
dated on 22.2.2001, the dispute was referred to
Labour Court, Rampur for its adjudication. The
Court decided the case vide Case No.101/2001
dated 13th May, 2002 and passed an award which
was published on 20.9.2002. It was held in the
Award that the termination of services dated
22.2.2001 is against the law and held that the
employee should be reinstated on his post and
wages from the date of joining should be given.
The employer has filed a writ petition challenging
the award in the Hon’ble Court, which was
dismissed by the Hon’ble Court. Thereafter in
order to maintain industrial peace, both the
parties held talks on various issues and arrived at
a settlement on the following terms :
1 The workman informed the Labour Court
that at the time of termination he was
getting Rs.4100/- PM as wages that he
was in the service of the management
from 1.10.1986.
2 The workman due to some personal
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 3
reasons did not want to continue his job
in the office and the same was informed
to the management and the management
has no objection to this.
3 Keeping in view the regular service of the
workman, the management is agreeable
to pay him gratuity and as per the terms
of the award, the total amount of earned
wages, and earned leave due from the dt.
of publication of award.
4 That the Management is paying to the
workman vide cheque No.0209181
dt.6.9.05, cheque No.0209182 dt.6.9.05
and cheque No.0209183 dt.6.9.05 a total
amount of Rs.4,95,000/-(Rupees Four
Lakh Ninety Five thousand only) which is
inclusive of Gratuity, earned leave and
wages from the date of publication of the
Award till this day dt.6.9.2005.
5 That on the said paid amount approx.
1,44,000/- (one lakh forty four thousand
only) of income tax is payable as per rules
and employer is ready to deposit the said
income tax amount on his own and the
employer shall issue a certificate in
favour of the workman in relation to
income tax on payment of income tax.
6 That after the said payment, the
relationship of employer and employee
between the parties shall cease and that
no other dues of the management,
towards the workman area payable.
7 That in accordance to this settlement all
the disputes between the pareties have
been fully and finally settled and that no
other dispute remains between the
parties.
8 That all the parties are ready to sign on
the settlement paper under the U.P.I.D.
Act before the conciliation Officer so that
it is applicable on both the sides
according to law.
9 That the management shall not press the
SLP filed by them in the Hon’ble Supreme
Court.
Sd/- Om Prakash Sd/ Rakesh
Upadhyaya
S/o Ghasiram Manager Personal &
AD
R/o Balmiki Colony, M/s Wheels India
Ltd.
Civil Lines, Rampur, Dist.Rampur
Workman
Witness of the Settlement
1 Dr.Jafer Ali S/o Sh.Mohd.Jan
R/o Mohd Kazi Pura Tada Badali
Dist.Rampur
2 Shri Mohd.Ashlam
S/o Shri Ahamad Khan
R/o Tadu Ka Mazara
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 3 of 3
PO Danpura
Dist.Rampur
3 Shri Mohd.Farook & Advocate
Chamber No.374 District Court
District Moradabad
Certified that both the parties have signed the
above said settlement before me today dated
6.9.2005.
Sd/- B.K.SINGH
Asstt.Labour Commissioner
Moradabad Area, Moradabad
Even though show cause notice was sent to the workmen
in both the matters, they have not entered appearance
either in person or through their counsel. Now as the
settlement has already been reached between the parties
and that the workmen have received all the amounts by
Cheques, we are of the opinion that there is no need to keep
the matter pending on the file any further.
We, therefore, while recording the settlement arrived at
between the parties, dispose of the above appeals in terms
of and as per settlement. Both the settlements will form
part of the judgment and decree. No costs.