JASHODA KUMARI PRADHAN vs. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Case Type: Civil Appeal

Date of Judgment: 22-01-2016

Preview image for JASHODA KUMARI PRADHAN vs. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Full Judgment Text

NON­REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.514 OF 2016       (Arising out of SLP(C)No.2266/2015 @ SLP..CC 910/2016)               ... APPELLANT(S)  JASHODA KUMARI PRADHAN & ANR.                 VS.
E DIVISIONAL MANA<br>DIA INSURANCE COM
ANIL R. DAVE, J
1. Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel. 3. The issue involved in the appeal is with regard to payment of interest, to the legal heirs of the deceased, under the provisions of Workmen Compensation Act, 1923. 4. The   Assistant   Labour   Commissioner­cum­Commissioner JUDGMENT for Workmen's Compensation, Odisha, Bhubaneswar, in W.C. th Case No.122/2009 dated 18   October, 2014, had awarded a sum of Rs.3,06,180/­ (Rupees Three Lakhs Six Thousand One Hundred Eighty only) by way of compensation to the heirs of a deceased workman along with interest thereon @12% per annum.     The said Award was challenged before the High Court   and   the   High   Court   allowed   the   appeal   filed   by claimants deleting the provisions with regard to payment of interest. Page 1 5. We fail to see the reason for which the High Court denied payment of interest to the legal heirs.  Therefore, we   set   aside   the   impugned   judgment   passed   by   the   High Court with regard to non­payment of interest and restore th the   Award   dated   18   October,   2014,   directing   the respondent to pay interest, as awarded by the Assistant Labour Commissioner­cum­Commissioner.  The amount shall be paid by the respondent­Insurance Company to the appellants within eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 6. If the respondent­Insurance Company is aggrieved by this order, it would be open to file an application so that the matter can be reconsidered. 7. Intimation   of   this   order   be   forwarded   to   the respondents. 8. With the above directions, the appeal is disposed of as   allowed   with   no   order   as   to   costs.     Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. JUDGMENT         ..............J. [ANIL R. DAVE] ..............J. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL] New Delhi; nd 22  January, 2016. Page 2