Full Judgment Text
2022/DHC/005292
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: 25.11.2022
+ CONT.CAS(C) 799/2021
CHANDANI JAGTAP AND ORS ..... Petitioners
versus
SHRI B CHANDRASHEKHAR AND ANR. ..... Respondents
AND
+ CONT.CAS(C) 613/2022
IRSHAD PATEL AND ORS. ..... Petitioners
versus
DR. PARBHAT KUMAR BUDHOLIA ..... Respondent
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioners : Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv.
For the Respondents : Mr. Tapan Kumar Trivedi, Mr. Hem Kumar
& Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, Advs.
CORAM
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioners have filed the present petitions, inter alia,
praying that the proceedings for Contempt of Court be initiated against
the respondents / contemnors for wilful disobedience of the orders
dated 26.08.2021 and 20.04.2022 passed in W.P.(C) No.6140/2019.
2. The said writ petition [being W.P.(C) No.6140/2019] was filed
raising the issue whether candidates who did not undergo the National
Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) can be admitted to the
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:Dushyant Rawal
Signing Date:03.12.2022
Cont.Cas(C) Nos.799/2021 & 613/2022 Page 1 of 5
2022/DHC/005292
Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, Homeopathy
(hereafter “AYUSH”) course.
3. The Ministry of AYUSH has decided to grant admissions to the
students in the AYUSH courses only through the NEET examination.
4. Some of the petitioners challenged the said requirement. Similar
petitions were also filed in High Courts of Karnataka, Punjab and
Haryana, and Rajasthan. Certain interim reliefs were granted by the
courts in those petitions. By an order dated 20.09.2019, the High Court
of Karnataka had granted an interim order in the following terms:
(i) In the on-going counselling for the academic year
2019-20, after all NEET qualified students have made
their choices and if seats remain unfilled, any other
candidate who has not appeared for NEET examination,
but has the minimum qualification to undergo the
AYUSH courses (BAMS, BHMS and BUMS) as
provided, shall be permitted to take part in the
counselling.
(ii) Such of those candidates would also be intimated
that their admission are being made in view of the
absence of NEET qualified candidates and would
ultimately remain subject to the result of these writ
petitions.
(iii) It is further made clear that the process as
indicated above would be applicable only to such of
those institutions who are otherwise qualified to make
admissions by possessing requisite infrastructure and if
the competent authorities have taken any action against
any of the colleges and restrained them from making
admissions for the present academic year, such of those
institutions shall not make admissions by taking benefit
of this order.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:Dushyant Rawal
Signing Date:03.12.2022
Cont.Cas(C) Nos.799/2021 & 613/2022 Page 2 of 5
2022/DHC/005292
(iv) If any of the institution against whom action had
been initiated has secured any interim order permitting
admissions and have already participated in the
counselling, such institutions are eligible for making
admissions in terms of this order.”
5. By an order dated 15.10.2019 passed in W.P.(C) No.6140/2019,
the Division Bench of this Court had noted the aforesaid order, and
passed directions in similar terms as the order dated 20.09.2019 passed
by the Karnataka High Court.
6. The petitioners’ grievance is that though they are covered by the
aforesaid order, they were not permitted to take the examination. A
series of orders have been passed in the said petition, [being W.P.(C)
6140/2019], including the order dated 26.08.2021 passed in CM
No.28296/2021 (which the petitioners allege has been deliberately
violated by the respondents). The applicants had filed the said
application, inter alia, seeking a direction to the Madhya Pradesh
Medical Science University, Jabalpur, M.P. to enroll the applicants
along with other students admitted by IGM Homeopathic Medical
College Hospital & Research Centre, Dhar for academic year 2019-20
and to permit them to write ensuing examination of BHMS first year
course.
7. By the said order dated 26.08.2021, this court allowed the
aforesaid prayer albeit, “ subject to verification being carried out, as to
whether or not the applicants / students, were accorded admission, on
or before 15.10.2019” . Despite the order dated 26.08.2021, the
respondents did not permit some of the applicants – who claim to be
the students of IGM Homeopathic Medical College Hospital &
Research Centre, Dhar – to take the said examination.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:Dushyant Rawal
Signing Date:03.12.2022
Cont.Cas(C) Nos.799/2021 & 613/2022 Page 3 of 5
2022/DHC/005292
8. Aggrieved by the same, some of the applicants filed another
application [being CM No.19035/2022] praying that they be permitted
to appear in the ensuing examination of BHMS first year course which
was scheduled on 27.04.2022. The ad-interim order dated 20.04.2022
was passed in the said application directing Madhya Pradesh Medical
Science University, Jabalpur, M.P. to allow the students admitted by
IGM Homeopathic Medical College Hospital & Research Centre,
Dhar for the academic year 2019-20 to appear in the examination of
BHMS first year course albeit “ subject to their fulfilling the
qualification other than the one challenged in the said writ petition” .
9. Despite the said order, the respondents did not permit some of
the applicants to take the said examination.
10. The failure on the part of the respondents to permit the
applicants to sit for the examination has resulted in the applicants /
petitioners filing these contempt petitions.
11. The respondents, in compliance of the order dated 17.11.2022,
have filed an affidavit tendering an unconditional apology and
pleading that a lenient view be taken. The respondents also point out
certain mitigating circumstances. They state that they have not
willfully violated the orders dated 26.08.2021 and 20.04.2022 as they
understood the said order to be in continuation of the earlier order
dated 15.10.2019. In terms of the said orders, all students were
required to qualify and meet all other conditions except the one that
was challenged in W.P.(C) No.6140/2019 (that is, requirement of
clearing the NEET examination). The respondents state that the
petitioners did not comply with the other conditions. First of all, IGM
Homeopathic Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Dhar had
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:Dushyant Rawal
Signing Date:03.12.2022
Cont.Cas(C) Nos.799/2021 & 613/2022 Page 4 of 5
2022/DHC/005292
been restrained from admitting any other students by the Government
of India (Ministry of AYUSH) by an order dated 23.07.2019.
Secondly, their admission forms clearly indicate that the admissions
were back dated inasmuch as although the forms record that the fees
have been paid on 16.10.2019, the forms are dated 15.10.2019.
12. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners disputes the
aforesaid contentions. The learned counsel for the petitioners points
out that the order dated 23.07.2019 had been stayed by an order passed
by the Madhya Pradesh High Court and the petitioners were admitted
on 15.10.2019.
13. The respondents claim that they were not aware of the
subsequent orders passed by the Court staying the order dated
23.07.2019 as they were not a party in the said writ petition.
14. The issue whether the petitioners were admitted prior to cut-off
date of 15.10.2019 is a contentious issue.
15. In the given facts, considering that the respondents have
tendered an unqualified apology, this Court considers it apposite to
accept the same and terminate the present contempt petitions.
16. It is clarified that all rights and contentions of the parties on the
merits of the entitlement of the petitioners, are reserved.
17. The petitions are disposed of.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
NOVEMBER 25, 2022
‘gsr’
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:Dushyant Rawal
Signing Date:03.12.2022
Cont.Cas(C) Nos.799/2021 & 613/2022 Page 5 of 5