Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 2
PETITIONER:
RAJARAM
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF M.P.
DATE OF JUDGMENT08/04/1993
BENCH:
REDDY, K. JAYACHANDRA (J)
BENCH:
REDDY, K. JAYACHANDRA (J)
SAWANT, P.B.
SINGH N.P. (J)
CITATION:
1994 AIR 846 1992 SCC (3) 634
JT 1992 (4) 290 1992 SCALE (2)103
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
ORDER
RAJARAM v. STATE OF M.P.
1. This is an appeal under Section 19 of the Terrorist and
Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act. The appellant was
tried for the offence punishable under Section 5(1) of the
TADA Act and also under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.
The Designated Court convicted him under Section 25 of the
Arms Act only and sentenced him to undergo six months’ RI.
153
2. The prosecution case is that on October 18, 1986, Hari
Chand PW 2 accosted the appellant and recovered from him an
unlicensed firearm. The panchnama was prepared and charge-
sheet was lodged.
3. In statement under Section 313 CrPC the accused denied
the offence and pleaded not guilty. In his defence he
examined DW 1 who deposed that the recovery was effected at
the instance of one Khazan Chand but he also admitted that
appellant and three others were summoned by the police and
they were required to produce the proof of their innocence
and that the illicit arms did not belong to them. This
defence is held to be an afterthought and the Designated
Court has given ample reasons for rejecting the same.
4. The only other submission put forward before the
Designated Court is that the official witnesses were all
interested and the case has been foisted. There is no
presumption that the evidence of the official witnesses
cannot be relied upon.
5. By the Amendment Act 39 of 1985 the minimum sentence of
one year is prescribed for unlawful possession of a firearm
without a licence. In the instant case, as provided in the
proviso, the Designated Court has given special reasons
though not very satisfactory and awarded six months’ RI. We
see no ground to interfere. The criminal appeal is
dismissed.
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 2
154