Himanshu Chauhan & Ors. vs. The State & Anr.

Case Type: Criminal Misc Case

Date of Judgment: 04-05-2023

Preview image for Himanshu Chauhan & Ors. vs. The State & Anr.

Full Judgment Text


Neutral Citation Number : 2023:DHC:3283
$~37
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 6358/2022
HIMANSHU CHAUHAN & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Varun Kashyap, Adv.
versus
THE STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the State
with Mr. Dipanshu Meena, Advocate
with SI Prabhakaran, PS Dabri.
Mr. Gaurav Kumar and Mr. Vikas
Kumar, Advs. for R-2.


% Date of Decision: 04th May, 2023
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

J U D G M E N T

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under section 482 Cr.P.C seeking
quashing of FIR No. 132/2020 registered under sections 498A/406/34
IPC at PS Dabri.

2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the Petitioner no.1/husband and
Respondent no.2/wife got married on 30.11.2016 according to Hindu
rites and ceremonies. That thereafter, some disputes arose between the
CRL.M.C. 6358/2022 Page 1 of 5
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:RAJ
BALA
Signing Date:12.05.2023
14:52:32

Neutral Citation Number : 2023:DHC:3283
parties and consequently respondent no.2 filed a complaint and the
present FIR was lodged.
3. However, it is submitted that now, the parties have amicably settled
the matter before the Media Centra, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, vide
Settlement Deed dated 24.03.2021.
4. The terms and conditions of the settlement deed dated 24.03.2021 are
as follows:
(a) It has been agreed between the complainant/wife Ms.
Shikha and respondent/husband Sh. Himanshu that they shall
seek divorce by mutual consent and co-operate with each
other in moving first motion and second motion before the
court.
(b) It has been agreed between the parties that
respondent/husband will pay total sum of Rs.10,00,000/-
(Rupees Ten Lakhs Only) in three instalments towards full
and final settlement of all her claims regarding dowry,
Istridhan and permanent alimony and maintenance (past,
present and future).
(c) That the respondent husband has agreed to pay first
instalment in a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs) to
the complainant/wife at the time of first motion petition
under Section 13-B(i) of HMA which shall be filled jointly
by the parties on or before 30.04.2021.
(d). That it has been agreed that respondent/husband shall
pay second instalment in a sum of Rs.3.5 lakhs (Rupees
Three Lakhs Filty Thousand Only) to the complainant/wife at
CRL.M.C. 6358/2022 Page 2 of 5
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:RAJ
BALA
Signing Date:12.05.2023
14:52:32

Neutral Citation Number : 2023:DHC:3283
the time of second motion under Section 13-(B)(I) of HMA
which shall be filed within 15 days after the expiry of
statutory period of six months.
(e) That it has been agreed that last and third payment of
Rs.3.5 lakhs (Rupees Three Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only) will
be paid by respondent/husband to the complainant/wife at the
time quashing of FIR before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court
which shall be filed by the parties within two months of
passing of the decree of divorce.
(f) That It has been agreed that both the parties will cooperate
with each other In quashing proceedings before the Hon'ble
Delhi High court and other legal proceedings, if any, in
respect of this marriage.
(g) That it has been agreed that complainant/wife shall
withdraw the present complaint casa under Section 12 of DV
Act and under Section 125 Cr. PC as mentioned above
respective courts on their respective next date of hearing and
after receiving the first Installment.
5. It is submitted that pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Deed the
parties have already been granted divorce vide decree of divorce dated
11.04.2022 in HMA No.888/2022. However, it is submitted that the
decree of divorce is not on record. Let the same be brought on record.
6. The respondent is to be paid a sum of Rupees 10,00,000/- (Rupees
Ten Lakhs) towards full and final settlement of all her claims
regarding dowry, istridhan and permanent alimony and maintenance.
Out of the said amount the respondent has been paid a sum of Rupees
CRL.M.C. 6358/2022 Page 3 of 5
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:RAJ
BALA
Signing Date:12.05.2023
14:52:32

Neutral Citation Number : 2023:DHC:3283
6,50,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Fifty Thousand) and the Remaining
sum of Rs.3,50,000/- has been received by way of a Demand Draft
bearing No.518636 dated 14.02.2023 drawn on Bank of India.
7. The decree of divorce has been granted vide order dated 11.04.2022
and HMA No. 888/2022 titled as Himanshu Chauhan v. Shikha, the
same is not record.
8. Let it be brought on record.
9. Respondent No.2 is present and states that she has entered into the
settlement voluntarily out of her own free will.
10. IO has duly identified the parties.
11. Section 482 CrPC acknowledges the inherent power of the high court
to secure the ends of justice. In cases where the offences are not
compoundable in nature, the parties on account of an amicable
settlement invoke the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for
quashing the proceedings on the plea that continuance thereof would
merely be an abuse of process of law.
12. It has repeatedly been held by the Apex Court that in the matrimonial
disputes, if the parties have settled the matter between themselves
amicably, it is the duty of Courts to encourage the same. Reliance can
be placed on B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana , (2003) 4 SCC 675;
Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and
Another ; 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8179.
13. I consider that there would be no purpose of continuing with the trial
CRL.M.C. 6358/2022 Page 4 of 5
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:RAJ
BALA
Signing Date:12.05.2023
14:52:32

Neutral Citation Number : 2023:DHC:3283
as the parties have entered into the settlement voluntarily without any
fear, force and coercion, and have decided to give quietus to the
proceedings. It was a matrimonial dispute which has been amicably
settled.
14. In view of the submissions made above, the Case FIR No. 132/2020
registered under sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Dabri all the
consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.
15. The present petition stands disposed of.


DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
MAY 4, 2023
Pallavi

CRL.M.C. 6358/2022 Page 5 of 5
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:RAJ
BALA
Signing Date:12.05.2023
14:52:32