LUNAWAT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY REP. BY MANIKLAL PEERCHAND LUNAWAT vs. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CULTURE SECRETARY

Case Type: Writ Petition Civil

Date of Judgment: 16-04-2019

Preview image for LUNAWAT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY REP. BY MANIKLAL PEERCHAND LUNAWAT vs. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CULTURE SECRETARY

Full Judgment Text

     NON­REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (c) No.96 OF 2011 Lunawat Construction Company, A Partnership Firm represented By its Partner Maniklal Peerchand Lunawat                ….Petitioner(s) VERSUS Union of India & Anr.        …Respondent(s) WITH TRANSFERRED CASE (c) No. 30 of 2010 AND WRIT PETITION (c) No.36 OF 2012 J U D G M E N T Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Signature Not Verified 1. By   filing   Writ   Petition   (c)   No.96/2011   under Digitally signed by ASHOK RAJ SINGH Date: 2019.04.22 13:51:20 IST Reason: Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner 1 therein   has   challenged   the   constitutional   validity   of The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites and Remains   (Amendment   and   Validation)   Act,     2010 (Annexure P­ 15).  2. In   connected   writ   petition   and   the   Transferred Case, the petitioners have claimed the similar reliefs, which   are   claimed   in   the   lead   Writ   Petition   No. 96/2011. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we deem it just and proper to send these writ petitions and the transferred case to the High Court of Bombay for their disposal on merits in accordance with law. 4. In our view, no prejudice is likely to cause to the parties, if these writ petitions and the transferred case are sent to the High Court for their hearing on merits of the controversy instead of deciding the issue by this Court in the first instance.  5. On the other hand, we are of the view that once the High Court renders its decision, this Court will 2 have the benefit of the findings of the High Court, if occasion arises. 6. In view of the foregoing discussion, both the writ petitions   and   the   transferred   case   (W.P.(c) No.96/2011,   W.P.(c)   No.36/2012   and   T.C.(c) No.30/2010   are   sent   to   the   High   Court   for   their disposal on merits in accordance with law. We request the High Court to decide the cases expeditiously. 7. The writ petitions and the transferred case are disposed of accordingly.           ………...................................J.         [ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE]                                          …...……..................................J.                 [DINESH MAHESHWARI] New Delhi; April 16, 2019 3