Full Judgment Text
1
Non-Reportable
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL/CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.404 OF 2008
Archbishop Raphael Cheenath S.V.D. …… Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Orissa & Anr. …… Respondents
With
Writ Petition (Civil) No.76/2009
Writ Petition (Civil) No.396/2009
Writ Petition (Crl.) No.126/2012
JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT
Uday Umesh Lalit, J.
1. Writ Petition (Civil) No.404 of 2008 has been filed in public interest
seeking to highlight failure on part of State of Orissa in deploying
adequate Police Force to maintain law and order in Kandhamal
District of Orissa and in protecting innocent people whose human
rights were violated after the unfortunate assassination of Swami
Page 1
2
Laxmanananda Saraswati and others on 23.08.2008 by some Maoists.
Writ Petition (Civil) Nos.76 of 2009, 396 of 2009 and Writ Petition
(Criminal) No.126 of 2012 also highlight the same issues. All these
| pray for | directions |
|---|
provide proper and adequate facilities in refugee camps, to prevent
communal violence, to provide adequate compensation to the victims
of such communal violence, to order institution of Commission of
Inquiry by a serving or a retired judge, to order investigation into the
crimes committed during such violence by Central Bureau of
Investigation (“CBI” for short) and to set up special courts to deal
with and try the offences committed during such violence. These
petitions were heard together with Writ Petition (Civil) No.404 of
2008 as the lead matter.
JUDGMENT
2. The incident and circumstances that led to the unrest and communal
violence were dealt with in the Report of the Investigating Team of the
National Human Rights Commission (hereinafter referred to as the
“NHRC”), certain portions of which for the sake of facility are reproduced
hereunder:
“On 23.08.2008 at 19.55 hrs. when Swami Laxmanananda
Saraswati was in his room, some armed men attacked his
Jalespetta Ashram. Two of them took control of the four
Page 2
3
| Officer (P<br>Amrita Na | SO) who<br>nd and loc |
|---|
The violence in the present case started after the death of the
Vishwa Hindu Parishad leader Swami Laxmanananda Saraswati
allegedly by the Christians supported by the naxalites. The
violence spread after the procession of the dead body of Swami
Laxmananana Saraswati was taken through various parts of the
district on a grand scale. Although the large scale violence
started after his death, the cracks within the society were
already existing as is evident from the data regarding clashes
between these communities in the previous years (ref report of
SP Kandhamal at P-911-913 of Annexure-II). This is also
evident from the fact that litigations between both the
communities are existing on the issue of reservation for the SC
(Pano) Christians.”
JUDGMENT
3. Writ Petition No.404 of 2008 filed on 02.09.2008, came up before this
Court on 03.09.2008. This Court thereafter passed various orders from time
to time to ensure that the situation was brought under control and relief in
full measure was extended to the victims. Following were the orders passed
by this Court:
Page 3
4
A. 3.09.2008
“Issue notice.
| respondent | through |
|---|
The Secretary General is directed to send a copy of this
order through telegram/fax to the Chief Secretary, State of
Orissa immediately.
List the matter on 4.9.2008 at 2.00 p.m.”
B. 4.09.2008
“Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner,
learned Additional Solicitor General and learned senior
counsel appearing for the State.
Pursuant to our directions, Chief Secretary of the State
of Orissa has sworn an affidavit given all the details taken
place in the State of Orissa to control the violence erupted
recently. In the affidavit, it is stated that all possible steps
have been taken by the Government especially in the
Kandhamal District. It is stated that there are 17 police
stations in the District and in all these police stations
necessary officers have been deployed and the service of the
CRPF, Reserved Armed Forces (RAF) have also been
obtained and deployed. 15 companies of CRPF, 24 platoons
of Orissa State Armed Police (OSAP) and in addition to the
District S.P. and other officers has taken adequate steps and
has given security to those people visiting as well as for
protection of others would be provided. It is also stated, the
State will take all possible steps to maintain law and order in
JUDGMENT
Page 4
5
the event of any proposed Yatra by any one whatsoever. The
State Government has been dealing with all the situations
firmly and even handedly and will continue to do so.
| in some of<br>and they a | the relief<br>re properl |
|---|
As regards the proposed Yatra to be organized by the
section of the people, it is submitted all possible steps would
be taken to prevent any Yatra being held and police and
other para military forces to make possible steps to prevent
any untoward incident being taken place. Section 144 has
already been imposed in the State in all the districts where
tension prevails.
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that even
Yesterday night some of the houses were burnt out in
Tikabali and Daringabadi villages. Learned counsel
appearing for the State submitted that so far no such
information has been received by them and the matter would
be enquired into and urgent steps would be taken in these
areas also to prevent any breach of law and order situation.
JUDGMENT
We hope the State police along with CRPF and other
para military forces would ensure the law and order situation
and people's life and property will be protected to best of
their ability. The State Government would also take urgent
steps to see that those who are in the relief camps are
protected and no miscreants shall be allowed to visit the
camps to create any problem…….”
Page 5
6
C. 22.10.2008
| 08, this<br>State Gov | Court had<br>ernment o |
|---|
JUDGMENT
Heard learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner,
the State and learned Additional Solicitor General for the Union
of India. The Principal Secretary, Home Department of the
State of Orissa has filed a detailed additional affidavit dated
17.10.2008 wherein it was stated that enough policemen had
been deployed in the area and the learned senior counsel for
the State highlighted all the details that were given in the
counter affidavit. It is also stated by the learned counsel that,
apart from these police forces, there are also additional police
and paramilitary personnel, sent by the Government of India
who were allowed to be in the State, be allowed to continue at
least till the end of December, 2008, i.e. till the festival season
is over.
Page 6
7
As regards the alleged rape, it is stated that nine accused
have so far been arrested by the police and the victim is not
cooperating with the police for having the Test Identification
Parade………………………………………
| his stage, t<br>e CBI. In t | he further<br>he interest |
|---|
Learned senior counsel appearing for the State submitted
that the relief camps are working well and all such details have
been stated in the affidavit filed by the Home Secretary. We
make it clear that any member of the NGO can associate in the
Committee coordinating the relief work in the relief camps.
Sufficient security also be provided by the State in the relief
camps.
The State is also agreed to give compensation to the
victims. It is stated in the affidavit of the State that Rs.
50,000/- is being given for the fully damaged house,
Rs.25,000/- for partly damaged house and Rs.2 lacs each is
being given to the damaged pubic institutions like schools,
hospitals, etc. and Rs.2 lacs each from the Chief Minister’s
Relief Fund to each of the families of the persons killed in the
violence. The petitioner has prayed that the churches which are
being destroyed or partly damaged should also be given their
financial assistance. Learned counsel appearing for the State
submitted that the State has taken a policy that religious or
worship place of any religion is not being given any financial
assistance though several institutions working under these
religion are being given. We are told by the counsel for the
petitioner that approximately 16 churches have been fully or
partly damaged. As regards the damaged churches also the
State can have a generous attitude on the matter and assess the
damage of those churches or other religious places and render
reasonable help to rebuilt the same. We hope that the State
could create an atmosphere where there shall be complete
harmony between the groups of people and the State shall
JUDGMENT
Page 7
8
endeavour to have discussions with the various groups and
bring about peace and do all possible help to the victims. The
existing battalions/police force sent by the Government of India
would continue till the end of December, 2008.
| r the cases | arising ou |
|---|
D. 5.01.2009
“This Court by an order passed on 22.10.2008 indicated that
sufficient paramilitary forces be deployed in the State of Orissa
till December, 2008. Learned counsel for the State submits that
still these forces are required in the State to maintain the law
and order situation even if removal of group of battalion is
necessary the same should be done in a phased manner. We
make it clear that the State Government may have discussions
with the Home Secretary of the Home Ministry and take an
appropriate decision having regard to the law and order
situation prevailing in the State for protection of minorities in
the State.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner stated
that large number of churches have been demolished and the
State Government is giving meager amount by way of
compensation. Some churches and religious places were in
existence which are being destroyed and the State Government
is not giving any compensation on the ground that there is some
dispute regarding the land. The Government may formulate a
scheme regarding these religious places and take appropriate
decision…….”
E. 13.04.2009
JUDGMENT
“Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
It is alleged by the petitioner that large number of houses
were either destroyed or partially damaged and in some cases
compensation has been given to the owners of these houses. It
is also alleged by the petitioners that nearly 183 churches have
Page 8
9
| n are waiti<br>rds are not | ng for the<br>provided t |
|---|
Leaned counsel appearing for the State of Orissa seeks
time to inquire into the details of these facts given by the
petitioners and the learned counsel seeks time to furnish the
details regarding the steps already taken by it. It is stated that a
committee has also been constituted to give relief to the
affected persons. The correctness of these details would be
enquired into by the State and a detailed report be furnished to
this Court within a period of four weeks. It is also submitted
that the State is taking steps to see that all the persons who are
in the relief camps exercise their franchise in the ensuing
general election and steps are being taken to take them to the
polling booths on the date of polling under the protection of the
police. Learned Addl. Solicitor General of India submits that a
sum of Rs.3 lacs each is proposed to be given to the dependents
of the persons who have died and as soon as the details are
available from the State the amount would be made available to
the State.
JUDGMENT
In the meanwhile, the relief works, which are already in
progress, may be continued…...”
F. 11.05.2009
“Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and also
learned counsel for the State.
Page 9
10
It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioners
that in some of the cases where the houses have been
destroyed and damaged, full compensation has not been paid. It
is also submitted that all the dependents of the deceased persons
have not received compensation.
| r hand, le<br>submitted | arned seni<br>that it has |
|---|
It is submitted by counsel for the State that in the case of
42 deaths which have taken place, dependents/legal heirs of the
deceased have been paid compensation by the State of upto
Rs.2 lacs and Rs.3 lacs has to be paid by the Union of India and
the list has already been sent by the State but learned Additional
Solicitor General submits that only 33 cases have been
recommended by the State and out of them 30 have been paid
compensation and the rest of the three have been rejected. As
regards the rest, the State may send its recommendations to the
Central Government and as soon as the same are received by
the Central Government, it may take appropriate action and the
compensation shall be disbursed at the earliest………..”
JUDGMENT
4. The monitoring by this Court through interim orders passed from
time to time and the efforts on part of the State Government to control and
remedy the situation and provide relief to the victims having yielded results,
Page 10
11
according to the petitioner in the lead matter, most of the issues and
grievances highlighted in the petition, now stand addressed. According to the
petitioner what remains to be considered are prayers D, G and H in Writ
| which are | set out her |
|---|
“D. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ
order or direction, directing the State of Orissa to forthwith pay
compensation to all those families whose houses have been
fully damaged @ of Rs.4 lakhs per family and Rs.2 Lakhs per
family for partial damage and Rs.5 Lakhs for every family
where death has taken place and Rs.1 Lakh for every family
where injuries have taken place.
G. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order
or direction, directing the Respondents to constitute and appoint
an Independent Commission for the framing of the
rehabilitation and compensation scheme and to assess the
quantum of damage, extent of damage, methodology of
assessment and for proportionate allocation of funds in the
affected areas.
H. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order
or direction, directing the Respondent State to pay all the
victims of communal violence full compensation for all the loss
incurred at actual market value proportionate to their loss”.
JUDGMENT
5. It may be noted at this stage that during the pendency of these matters,
an Investigating Team of NHRC visited the areas in question and submitted
its Report. The relevant portions of their report are to the following effect:
“10.3.11. It is evident that more forces were sent as and
when the violence started spreading to different areas of
Kandhamal. Had the forces arrived in sufficient strength in the
initial stage itself, the violence and the number of deaths could
Page 11
12
| 08.2008. A<br>d promptly | dditional<br>and arres |
|---|
JUDGMENT
Page 12
13
attending the patients in these camps. There was also a stock of
medicines in these camps.”
6. The Report of the NHRC also included a Status Report on “Relief,
| conciliation | Measure |
|---|
Administration, Kandhamal” which was submitted to NHRC on 14.1.2011.
Chapter III of that Status Report deals with Rehabilitation and
Reconciliation efforts under following heads:
(I) Assistance to Next of Kins of Dead Persons.
(II) House Building Assistance
(III) Financial Assistance to Religious Institutions
(IV) Assistance to Damaged Shop/Shop-cum-Residence
(V) Financial Assistance to Public Institutions
(VI) Assistance to the Children of Victims of Communal, Ethnic or
Terrorist Violence.
(VII) Financial Assistance to SHG Centres
(VIII) Special Steps for Rehabilitation of Affected Families.
(IX) Administration of Justice
(X) Strengthening of Policing Infrastructure in District
(XI) Dialogue and Peace Committees……..
(XII) Theatre, Drama, Music…..For Peace.
JUDGMENT
For the present purposes, we may quote items (IX) and (X) which were as
under:-
“(IX) Administration of Justice
Government has taken following steps for ensuring
justice to the victims of violence:
A) State Government has constituted a Commission of
Inquiry consisting of Shri Justice S.C.Mohapatra, a
retired Judge to enquire into various matters relating
to killing of Swami Laxmanananda Saraswati and
others and incidents of violence in its aftermath.
Page 13
14
B) In order to speed up investigation process in aftermath
| rts of thi<br>ed in 790 | s team, i<br>cases out |
|---|
C) Two Fast Track Courts have been constituted to
ensure speedy disposal of cases related to
communal/ethnic violence in the district.
Government of Orissa has also appointed Special
Public Prosecutor to deal with such cases in an
effective and efficient manner.
(X) Strengthening of Policing Infrastructure in District:
State Government has taken a number of steps for strengthening
and streamlining policing in the district. Steps taken include:
(1)New Police Station has been created at Chakapad with
sanctioned strength of Inspector of Police (O1),
Sub-Inspector of Police(02), Assistant Sub-Inspector
of Police(02), Havildar(01), Constable (10) and
Assistant Driver(01).
JUDGMENT
(2)K. Nuagam Out-Post has been upgraded to a Police
Station with additional sanctioned posts of Inspector
of Police(01), Sub-Inspector of Police(02), Assistant
Sub-Inspector of Police(01), Constable(04) &
Assistant Driver(01).
(3)As Police Station areas of G. Udayagiri, Raikia,
Tikabali & Chakapad were some of the worst affected
areas during the communal/ethnic violence in 2008,
Office of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer (SDPO)
Page 14
15
has been created at G. Udayagiri for better
coordination and immediate response to any such
situation in future.
(4)One post of Additional Superintendent of Police,
| endent of<br>nd order. | Police, Ka |
|---|
(5)One post of Reserve Inspector (General) has been
created in Office of the Superintendent of Police,
Kandhamal.
(6)40 posts of Constables have been upgraded to
Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police.
(7)The State Government has sanctioned 750 posts of
Special Police Officer (SPO) for the district.
(8)Physical infrastructure has been strengthened by way
of building 100 men barracks in each of the Police
Station in the District. This allows positioning of
CRPF, OSAP, OSSF and other such special police
forces, within the campus of Police Station, which
results in better coordination and immediate response
to any law and order situation.”
JUDGMENT
7. The last affidavit on record filed on behalf of the State of Orissa on
01.03.2016 sets out in detail the steps taken by the State and the present
status. Paragraphs 3 to 8 of said affidavit are as under:-
“3. That it is humbly submitted that during Kandhamal Riots
2008, 827 FIRs were received and registered and have been
duly investigated into. Two Fast Track Courts have been
established to ensure speedy disposal of the cases relating to
communal/ethnic violence in the district. Special Public
Prosecutors have also been engaged to deal with such cases in
Page 15
16
an effective and efficient manner. The current status of the
cases are given below:
| 1. No. of communal violence cases registered 827<br>2. No. of cases final form submitted 827<br>3. No. of cases final reports submitted 315<br>4. No. of cases charge-sheets submitted 512<br>5. No. of cases trial have been completed 362<br>6. No. of cases ended in conviction 78<br>7. No. of persons convicted 493<br>8. No. of cases ended in acquittal 284<br>9. No. of cases pending trial 150<br>10. No. of cases appeal have been made 15<br>11. No. of accused persons arrested/surrendered 6495<br>4. That it is humbly submitted that during Kandhamal Riots<br>2008, relief camps were set up at Tikabali, G.Udayagiri, Raikia,<br>K.Nuagaon, Baliguda, Daringibari, Phulbani and Phiringia to<br>provide immediate relief to the victims of violence. All efforts<br>were taken for safe return of camp inmates to their villages. As<br>result of which all relief camps are closed now and the last<br>relief camp was closed on 25.08.2009. | 1. | No. of communal violence cases registered | 827 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2. | No. of cases final form submitted | 827 | |
| 3. | No. of cases final reports submitted | 315 | |
| 4. | No. of cases charge-sheets submitted | 512 | |
| 5. | No. of cases trial have been completed | 362 | |
| 6. | No. of cases ended in conviction | 78 | |
| 7. | No. of persons convicted | 493 | |
| 8. | No. of cases ended in acquittal | 284 | |
| 9. | No. of cases pending trial | 150 | |
| 10. | No. of cases appeal have been made | 15 | |
| 11. | No. of accused persons arrested/surrendered | 6495 |
JUDGMENT
6. That it is further respectfully submitted that a total
number of 4822 houses have been affected which includes 3316
partially damaged and 1506 fully damaged houses. House
Building Assistance (HBA) @ Rs.50,000/- each for fully
damaged house, Rs.20,000/- each for partially damaged houses
have been provided out of the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund. In
Page 16
17
addition to this financial assistance @ Rs.20,000/- for each
fully damaged house and Rs.10,000/- for each partially
damaged house have been provided by the Government of
India.
| amaged du<br>and 225 | ring the v<br>are small |
|---|
8. That it is humbly submitted that 119 number of
shops/shop-cum-residence were damaged. Depending on
extent of damage a total amount of Rs.19,45,000/- was
disbursed to 119 shops/shop-cum-residence. Similarly,
Rs.6,30,000/- out of Chief Minister’s Relief Fund and
Rs.12,00,000 out of Prime Minister’s Relief Fund were
disbursed to 12 number of public institutions which were
damaged during violence. Rs.1,30,000/- was also given to 4
number of damaged self-help group (SHG) centers. ”
JUDGMENT
8. In written submissions filed on 03.03. 2016 on behalf of the petitioner
in the lead matter, the facts asserted in the affidavit dated 01.03.2016 are not
contested but what is stressed is that out of 512 charge-sheets submitted,
trials have been completed only in 362 which resulted in conviction in 78
Page 17
18
cases while 284 cases ended in acquittal and only 15 appeals have been
filed.
9. While dealing with cases concerning communal violence that
| d Muzaff | arnagar in |
|---|
September 2013, this Court in its judgment rendered on 26.03.2014 in
1
Mohd. Haroon and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr. had dealt with
financial assistance given to the families of the deceased and injured
persons, the relevant paragraphs being:-
“ 49. According to Letter No. 1027k/chh-sa.ni.pr.-13/15(14)2013
dated 10-9-2013 and Government Order No.
F.A.-2-367/Ten-92-100(30)D/92-Home Police, Section-12
dated 21-12-1992, financial assistance to the families of
deceased and injured persons is to be given at the following
rates:
In case of death Rs 10,00,000 per death
In case of serious injury Rs 50,000 per person
In case of simple injury Rs 20,000 per person
JUDGMENT
56. The Government of India has also sanctioned ex gratia
relief from the Prime Minister’s Relief Fund at the rate of Rs 2
lakhs per family for the dependants or legal heirs of the
deceased and at the rate of Rs 50,000 for the seriously injured
persons………….”
1
(2014)5 SCC 252
Page 18
19
Paragraph 71 of the decision discloses that the State granted further
compensation of Rs.300,000/- taking the total compensation in cases of
death during communal violence to the extent of Rs.15,00,000/-.
10. It is true that the incidents of communal violence had occurred in and
around Muzaffarnagar in the year 2013 and that the State itself had decided
to pay compensation in the scale as mentioned above. We have considered
the scales at which compensation has been granted and disbursed in the
present matter. In our view the ends of justice would be met if the State
Government and the Central Government are directed to pay additional
compensations as set out in the chart below. The compensation suggested in
Writ Petition No.404 of 2008 as against each of the categories is set out in
Column No.2 while Column No.3 gives the figures of compensation already
granted and disbursed. In our view, the additional compensation as detailed
JUDGMENT
in Column No.4 ought to be paid to the victims or their family which will
provide solace and succor. It is ordered accordingly.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Categories | Compensation Com<br>suggested in gran<br>WP 404/2008 | pensation already<br>ted and disbursed | Additional Compensation<br>that shall be paid |
| In case of<br>every death<br>during<br>communal<br>violence. | Rs.500,000 Rs.2<br>Gov<br>Rs.3<br>Gov | 00,000 by State<br>t.<br>+<br>00,000 by Central<br>t. | Rs.300,000 by State<br>Govt. |
| In case of | Rs.200,000 | Nil | Rs.30,000 in cases of |
Page 19
20
| injuries<br>suffered by<br>victims during<br>such violence | serious injury and Rs.<br>10,000 in cases of simple<br>injury-to be paid by State<br>Govt. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| In case of<br>fully damaged<br>houses | Rs.400,000 per Rs.5<br>family Gov<br>Rs.2<br>Gov | 0,000 by State<br>t.<br>+<br>0,000 by Central<br>t. | Rs.50,000 by State Govt.<br>+<br>Rs.20,000 by Central<br>Govt. |
| In case of<br>partly<br>damaged<br>houses | Rs.200,000 per Rs.2<br>family Gov<br>Rs.1<br>Gov | 0,000 by State<br>t.<br>+<br>0,000 by Central<br>t. | Rs.20,000 by State Govt.<br>+<br>Rs.10,000 by Central<br>Govt. |
| 11. The report of the Investigating Team of the NHRC as stated above,<br>does show that though adequate forces were deployed and sent as the<br>violence started spreading, the forces could have arrived in sufficient<br>strength at the initial stage itself. If there were incidents of unrest in the past,<br>the State ought to have been more vigilant. The NHRC team has found that<br>there was no evidence regarding the police conniving with the perpetrators |
of violence. Further, immediate steps were certainly taken, in that relief
JUDGMENT
camps were set up and strength of police contingents were increased.
Paragraphs IX and X of the Status Report submitted by the District
Administration to the NHRC on 14.01.2011 show the concern of the State
Government under respective heads. The State Government shall do well to
enquire into and find the causes for such communal unrest and strengthen
the fabric of the Society. Strengthening of police infrastructure in the
District as detailed in Paragraph 10 of that Status Report will undoubtedly
Page 20
21
help in curbing any re-occurrence of such communal violence but at the
same time peace building measures must also be undertaken.
| ult to direc | t that inve |
|---|
Agency other than the State. Paragraph 115 of the judgment sums up the
discussion on this issue in following words:-
“115. At this juncture viz. after a period of six months, whether
an agency other than the State is to be directed to investigate
and take appropriate steps. We have already noted various
circumstances under which the court can entrust investigation
to agency other than the State such as SIT or CBI. We have to
2
keep in mind, as observed by the Constitution Bench referred
to supra, that no inflexible guidelines can be laid down to
decide whether or not such power should be exercised.
However, this Court reiterated that such order is not to be
passed as a matter of routine or merely because a party has
levelled some allegations against the State Police. In other
words, this extraordinary power must be exercised sparingly,
cautiously and in exceptional situations where it becomes
necessary to provide credibility or instil confidence in
investigation or where such an order may be necessary for
doing complete justice in enforcing the fundamental rights.
Apart from this, immediately after the occurrence, Writ Petition
(Crl.) No. 155 of 2013 came to be filed in this Court even in the
first week of September, 2013. Pursuant to the same, this Court,
after taking note of the importance of the issues viz. many
people lost their lives and properties, sufferings of both
communities and children, issued various directions to the State
JUDGMENT
2
State of W.B. v. Committee for Protection of
Democratic Rights (2010) 3 SCC 571
Page 21
22
and the Central Government. We have already extracted those
orders in the earlier part of our judgment.”
13. In the present case, the order dated 22.10.2008 discloses that this
| further inv | estigation |
|---|
this length of time, when final form has been submitted in all 827 cases of
communal violence which were registered, it would not be proper to direct
that the investigation and consequential steps be entrusted to the CBI. We,
therefore, reject such prayer made in the connected petitions. The request
for setting up of Special Courts to deal with and try the offence committed
during such violence, already stands granted as the State has set up two
Special Courts.
14. The affidavit filed on behalf of the State on 01.03.2013 discloses that
out of 827 registered cases, 512 cases resulted in filing of charge-sheets
JUDGMENT
while in 315 cases final reports were submitted. In other words, in 315 cases
either no offence was found to have been made out or the offenders could
not be detected. Such large proportion is quite disturbing. The State could
do well in looking into all these 315 cases and see that the offenders are
brought to book. Similarly, out of 362 trials which stand completed only 78
have resulted in conviction, which again is a matter of concern. The
Page 22
23
concerned authorities must see to it that the matters are taken up wherever
acquittals were not justified on facts.
| s College S | ociety an |
|---|
3
and another , though made in the context of rights of minorities to set up
and administer institutions for imparting education, are quite apt even in the
present context:-
“…..The minorities are as much children of the soil as
the majority and the approach has been to ensure that nothing
should be done, as might deprive the minorities of a sense of
belonging, of a feeling of security, of a consciousness of
equality and of the awareness that the conservation of their
religion, culture, language and script as also the protection of
their educational institutions is a fundamental right enshrined in
the Constitution.
… It can, indeed, be said to be an index of the level of
civilization and catholicity of a nation as to how far their
minorities feel secure and are not subject to any discrimination
or suppression.”
JUDGMENT
16. With the directions as stated above, these petitions are disposed of.
..…………………..CJI.
(T.S. Thakur)
3
AIR 1974 SC 1389=1974(1) SCC 717
Page 23
24
…..…………………..J.
(Uday Umesh Lalit)
New Delhi,
August 02, 2016
JUDGMENT
Page 24