Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1
PETITIONER:
INDER SINGH & ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT02/11/1995
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
HANSARIA B.L. (J)
CITATION:
1995 SCC Supl. (4) 282 JT 1995 (8) 555
1995 SCALE (6)467
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
O R D E R
Leave granted.
The appellant had sought appointment of an arbitrator
under Section 8(b) of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of
Immovable Property Act, 1952. The High Court dismissed the
writ petition on two grounds, namely, on delay as well as on
merits. Thus this appeal by special leave.
The Land Acquisition Collector, the competent
authority, had passed the award determining compensation at
varied rates, namely, Rs.5,000/-, Rs.4,200/- and Rs.2001/-
in respect of three different belts of land. Thereupon, 22
persons including the appellants herein had agreed to
receive the compensation and executed âKâ Form Agreement per
Rule 9(5) (i) of the Rules made under the Act and accepted
the compensation without protest. Section 8(b) of the Act
requires appointment of arbitrator when there is no
agreement between the parties reached on the compensation
determined by the Land Acquisition Officer.
In view of the above circumstances, the appellants
having received the compensation under Form âKâ without
protest, Rule 9 (5) (i) would apply to them and they are not
entitled under Section 8(b) of the Act for appointment of an
arbitrator.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.