Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 7
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 7248 of 1999
PETITIONER:
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai
RESPONDENT:
M/s Damani Brothers
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17/12/2002
BENCH:
M.B. SHAH, ARIJIT PASAYAT & D.M. DHARMADHIKARI.
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
The basic issue involved in this appeal is whether the Settlement
Commission (hereinafter referred to as ’the Commission’) gets a complete
role in total substitution of other authorities under the Income Tax Act, 1961
(in short ’the Act’) and if so, for what purpose and to what extent. When this
appeal was placed before a Bench of two learned Judges, it was considered
appropriate to list the appeal before a larger bench than merely bench of two
Judges.
That is how the matter was placed before us.
Factual backdrop in nutshell is as follows:
Respondent-Damani Brothers (hereinafter referred to as the
’assessee’) filed an application for settlement before the Mumbai Bench of
the Commission. Chairman of the Commission exercising power under
Section 245 (BA)(5A) of the Act constituted a Special Bench vide order
dated 18.9.1998 for adjudicating following three issues.
"1. Was the Special Bench of the Settlement Commission
right in holding in the case of Om Metals and Mineral
Pvt. Ltd. (193 ITR 57 ITSC) that the assessment order
passed by the assessing officer before the admission of
the settlement application subsisted and recovery
proceedings continued, even after the admission of the
said application, especially after the judgment of the
Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Express Newspaper
Ltd. (206 ITR 443)?
2. If the answer to question No.1 is in the affirmative
would it be correct to say that once the Settlement
Commission determines a liability of the applicant for
tax, penalty and interest under section 245D(4), the
orders of the lower authorities would automatically stand
set aside and consequently there will be no liability under
section 220(2) of the Act?
3. If the answer to question No.1 is in the affirmative,
or not the question No.2 in the negative, has the
Settlement Commission powers to waive interest u/s
220(2) of the Act?"
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 7
The Special Bench by majority view in its judgment dated 15.4.1999
came to hold that the orders of the lower authorities are not automatically set
aside by the Commission’s order under Section 245D(4); but are modified to
give effect to such order. By the theory of merger, the liability of interest
under Section 220(2) if any, will be up to the date of the order under Section
245D(1). Thereafter, there will be no liability for interest under Section
220(2); the Commission has power to waive or reduce interest under Section
220(2) of the Act. The Vice Chairman did not agree with a reply to question
No.3 and held that recovery proceedings based on the order of the
assessments passed before the date of filing an application under Section
245C can be continued even after the admission of the application and where
the assessment order is passed after the date of filing an application under
Section 245C, the question of liability of interest under Section 220(2) does
not arise.
Civil Appeal has been filed raising the following questions:
"I Whether the Settlement Commission is
empowered to waive or reduce the interest u/s. 234-A
read with Section 220 [2] of the Income Tax Act while
exercising its jurisdiction under Section 245-D[4] of the
said Act?
II. Whether the Assessment Order passed by the
Assessing Officer prior to the admission of Settlement
Application under Section 245-C of the Act, will subsist
and the recovery proceedings will continue or not? On
this issue, the petitioner is relying on the decision,
reported in 206 ITR 443 [S.C.]; CIT vs. Express
Newspaper Ltd.
III. Whether after determination of liability by the
Settlement Commission, the orders of the lower
authorities under the Act would automatically stand set
aside?"
Stand of the revenue as highlighted is that the Commission’s approach
is not correct and is not sustainable. Reference is made to the Constitution
Bench decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Anjum M.
H. Ghaswala and Ors. (2001(252) ITR 1). Reference was made to various
provisions of Chapter XIX-A in this regard. It is further submitted that there
is no power of waiver conferred on the Commission to waive the interest
charged under Section 220(2) of the Act.
In response, learned counsel for the assessee submitted that an
artificial distinction is sought to be made between the date of filing of
petition under Section 245C and the date of decision to proceed with the
petition under Section 245D. With reference to definition of the expression
"case" as appearing under Section 245A, it is submitted that the proceedings
may be pending before the concerned authority i.e. the Assessing Authority,
the Appellate Authority or the Revisional Authority; and Explanation (1)(v)
to Section 153(3) makes it clear that extension is granted for completing the
pending proceedings in case the petition under Section 245C is rejected.
Therefore, Commission gets jurisdiction to deal with the matter, as soon as
an application is made under Section 245C. Commission till admission of
the petition exercises powers of the income-tax authorities and after
admission it functions as a Settlement Commission in addition to powers
exercisable by the income-tax authorities. With reference to Anjum’s case
(supra) it was submitted that specific power of waiver is given to the
concerned authority and, therefore, interest charged can be waived. There
cannot be double levy of interest and when interest is charged under Section
245D(2C)/6A interest under Section 234B cannot be charged.
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 3 of 7
In order to appreciate the rival submissions, it is necessary to take
note of few provisions so far as relevant:
"Section 153(3): The provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2)
shall not apply to the following classes of assessments,
reassessments, and recomputations which may, subject to the
provisions of sub-section (2A), be completed at any time
(i) xxx xxx xxx
[Explanation 1. In computing the period of limitation for the
purposes of this section
xxx xxx xxx
(v) in a case where an application made before the
Income-tax Settlement Commission under section
245C is rejected by it or is not allowed to be
proceeded with by it, the period commencing from
the date on which such application is made and
ending with the date on which the order under sub-
section (1) of section 245D is received by the
Commissioner under sub-section (2) of that
section,
shall be excluded :
xxx xxx xxx
Section 220(2) If the amount specified in any notice of
demand under section 156 is not paid within the period limited
under sub-section (1), the assessee shall be liable to pay simple
interest at one and one-half per cent for every month or part of a
month comprised in the period commencing from the day
immediately following the end of the period mentioned in sub-
section (1) and ending with the day on which the amount is
paid:
Provided that, where as a result of an order under section 154,
or section 155, or section 250, or section 254, or section 260, or
section 262, or section 264 or an order of the Settlement
Commission under sub-section (4) of section 245D, the amount
on which interest was payable under this section had been
reduced, the interest shall be reduced accordingly and the
excess interest paid, if any, shall be refunded.
xxx xxx xxx
(2A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2),
’the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner may reduce or
waive the amount of interest paid or payable by an assessee
under the said sub-section if he is satisfied that
(i) payment of such amount has caused or would
cause genuine hardship to the assessee;
(ii) default in the payment of the amount on which
interest has been paid or was payable under the
said sub-section was due to circumstances beyond
the control of the assessee; and
(iii) the assessee has co-operated in any inquiry relating
to the assessment or any proceeding for the
recovery of any amount due from him.
Interest for defaults in payment of advance tax.
234B. (1) Subject to the other provisions of this section, where,
in any financial year, an assessee who is liable to pay advance
tax under section 208 has failed to pay such tax or, where the
advance tax paid by such assessee under the provisions of
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 4 of 7
section 210 is less than ninety per cent of the assessed tax, the
assessee shall be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of one
and one-half per cent for every month or part of a month
comprised in the period from the 1st day of April next following
such financial year to the date of determination of total income
under sub-section (1) of section 143 and where a regular
assessment is made, to the date of such regular assessment, on
an amount equal to the assessed tax or, as the case may be, on
the amount by which the advance tax paid as aforesaid falls
short of the assessed tax.
Explanation 1- In this section, "assessed tax" means, -
(a) for the purposes of computing the interest payable
under section 140A, the tax on the total income as
declared in the return referred to in that section;
(b) in any other case, the tax on the total income
determined under sub-section (1) of section 143 or
on regular assessment,
as reduced by the amount of tax deducted or collected at source
in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XVII on any
income which is subject to such deduction or collection and
which is taken into account in computing such total income.
Explanation 2. Where, in relation to an assessment year, an
assessment is made for the first time under section 147, the
assessment so made shall be regarded as a regular assessment
for the purposes of this section.
Explanation 3. In Explanation 1 and in sub-section (3) "tax on
the total income determined under sub-section (1) of section
143" shall not include the additional income-tax, if any, payable
under section 143.
xxx xxx xxx
(4) Where, as a result of an order under section 154 or
section 155 or section 250 or section 254 or section 260 or
section 262 or section 263 or section 264 or an order of the
Settlement Commission under sub-section (4) of section 245D,
the amount on which interest was payable under sub-section (1)
or sub-section (3) has been increased or reduced, as the case
may be, the interest shall be increased or reduced accordingly,
and
(i) in a case where the interest is increased, the
Assessing Officer shall serve on the assessee a
notice of demand in the prescribed form specifying
the sum payable, and such notice of demand shall
be deemed to be a notice under section 156 and the
provisions of this Act shall apply accordingly;
(ii) in a case where the interest is reduced, the excess
interest paid, if any, shall be refunded.
(5) The provisions of this section shall apply in respect of
assessments for the assessment year commencing on the 1st day
of April, 1989 and subsequent assessment years.
"245D. Procedure on receipt of an application under section
245C.
(1) On receipt of an application under section 245C, the
Settlement Commission shall call for a report from the
Commissioner and on the basis of the materials contained in
such report and having regard to the nature and circumstances
of the case or the complexity of the investigation involved
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 5 of 7
therein, the Settlement Commission may, by order, allow the
application to be proceeded with or reject the application :
Provided that an application shall not be rejected under this
sub-section unless an opportunity has been given to the
applicant of being heard:
Provided further that the Commissioner shall furnish the report
within a period of forty-five days of the receipt of
communication from the Settlement Commission in case of all
applications made under section 245C on or after the 1st day of
July, 1995 and if the Commissioner fails to furnish the report
within the said period, the Settlement Commission may make
the order without such report.
(1A) Omitted
(2C) Where the additional amount of income-tax is not paid
within the time specified under sub-section (2A), then, whether
or not the Settlement Commission has extended the time for
payment of the amount which remains unpaid or has allowed
payment thereof by instalments under sub-section (2B), the
assessee shall be liable to pay simple interest at fifteen per cent
per annum on the amount remaining unpaid from the date of
expiry of the period of thirty-five days referred to in sub-section
(2A).
(4) After examination of the records and the report of the
Commissioner, received under sub-section (1), and the report, if
any, of the Commissioner received under sub-section (3), and
after giving an opportunity to the applicant and to the
Commissioner to be heard, either in person or through a
representative duly authorized in this behalf, and after
examining such further evidence as may be placed before it or
obtained by it, the Settlement Commission may, in accordance
with the provisions of this Act, pass such order as it thinks fit
on the matters covered by the application and any other matter
relating to the case not covered by the application, but referred
to in the report of the Commissioner under sub-section (1) or
sub-section (3).
(6) Every order passed under sub-section (4) shall provide
for the terms of settlement including any demand by way of tax,
penalty or interest, the manner in which any sum due under the
settlement shall be paid and all other matters to make the
settlement effective and shall also provide that the settlement
shall be void if it is subsequently found by the Settlement
Commission that it has been obtained by fraud or
misrepresentation of facts.
(6A) Where any tax payable in pursuance of an order under
sub-section (4) is not paid by the assessee within thirty-five
days of the receipt of a copy of the order by him, then, whether
or not the Settlement Commission has extended the time for
payment of such tax or has allowed payment thereof by
instalments, the assessee shall be liable to pay simple interest at
fifteen per cent per annum on the amount remaining unpaid
from the date of expiry of the period of thirty-five days
aforesaid."
The conclusions in Anjum’s case (supra) can be summed up as
follows.
(1) Commission in exercise of its power under Section 245D(4) and (6),
does not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under
Sections 234A, 234B and 234C, except to the extent of granting relief under
the Circulars by Notification dated 23rd May, 1996 issued by the Board
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 6 of 7
under Section 119 of the Act. While exercising the power derived under the
Circulars of the Board, the Commission does not act as a subordinate to the
Board but will be enforcing the relaxed provisions of the circulars for the
benefit of the assessee in the process of settlement.
(2) Interest due under the mandatory provisions like Sections 234A, 234B
and 234C has to be included in the settlement.
(3) Wherever the Act contemplated power to waive or reduction of
interest to be exercised by any particular authority in any particular situation
it has done so like in Sections 139(8), 215(4), 216 and Section 220(2A).
(4) Prior to Finance Act, 1987, the corresponding sections pertaining to
imposition of interest used the expression ’may’ but the change brought
about in the Finance Act, 1987 is a clear indication that the intention of the
legislature was to make the collection of statutory interest mandatory. The
expression ’shall’ is used deliberately.
It has to be noted that the Commission exercises power in respect of
income which was not disclosed before the authorities in any proceeding,
but are disclosed in the petition under Section 245C. It is not that any
amount of undisclosed income can be brought to the notice of the
Commission in the said petition. Commission exercises jurisdiction if the
additional amount of tax on such undisclosed income is more than a
particular figure (which at different points of time exceeded rupees fifty
thousand or rupees one hundred thousand, as the case may be). The assessee
must have in addition furnished the return of income which he is or was
required to furnish under any of the provisions of the Act. In essence the
requirement is that there must be an income disclosed in a return furnished
and undisclosed income disclosed to the Commission by a petition under
Section 245C. A new Chapter XIX-A was introduced by the Taxation Laws
(amendment) Act, 1975 (in short the ’Amendment Act’) w.e.f. 1.4.1976. The
Commission is constituted by the Central Government for the settlement of
cases under Chapter XIX-A. The expression "case" as appearing in Section
245A(b) refers to any proceeding under the Act for the assessment or re-
assessment of income of any person in respect of any year or years or by
way of appeal or revision in connection with such assessment or re-
assessment which may be pending before any income-tax authority on the
date on which an the application under sub-section (1) of Section 245C is
made. It further provides that where any appeal or application for revision
has been preferred after the expiry of the specified period and which has not
been admitted then the same shall not be deemed to be a proceeding pending
within the meaning of clause (b) of Section 245A. Scheme of Chapter XIX-
A shows that the filing of application by the assessee is a unilateral act, and
the department may not be aware of the same. It has to be noted that if an
application for settlement is filed under Section 245C, it is not automatically
admitted. Section 245D deals with procedure on receipt of an application
under Section 245C. Under sub-section (1) thereof, the Commission after
following the prescribed procedure can allow the application to be
proceeded with or rejected. Only after the Commission allows the petition to
be proceeded with, it exercises the power of settlement.
Stand of the assessee is that before the Commission decides to
proceed with the matter, it exercises the functions of the income-tax
authority and after deciding to proceed with the petition exercises dual
function as the Commission and the income-tax authority. The plea is
untenable for more reasons than one. Before the Commission decides to
proceed with the petition, it cannot complete assessment in respect of a
return which is pending before the assessing officer or even cannot act as an
appellate or revisional authority. The return filed is in respect of disclosed
income. Similar is the position vis--vis the appellate and the revisional
authority. The petition before the Commission is in respect of undisclosed
income, therefore, the situation is different till the Commission decides to
proceed with the matter. That being the position, the income-tax authorities
are free to proceed in the prescribed manner till the Commission decides to
proceed with the petition. Emphasis was laid by the assessee on certain
observations made by this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Express
Newspapers Ltd. (1994 (206) ITR 443). Observations to the effect that the
proceedings before the Commission are not confined to the income disclosed
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 7 of 7
before it, does not mean that even before the Commission decides to proceed
with the case, it can deal with disclosed income. While determining the total
income, the Commission has to take note of both the disclosed income and
the undisclosed income. This is logical because there cannot be two different
total incomes for the same assessment year i.e. disclosed total income and
undisclosed total income. Aggregation of both the disclosed and undisclosed
income is also necessary because in several years different rates of tax for
various slabs of income are provided. By way of an illustration, it may be
said that supposing the disclosed income is rupees two lakhs and the
undisclosed income is five lakhs, the rate of tax levied on rupees two lakhs
may be one but may be different for an income of rupees seven lakhs. For
the purpose of computation of taxes, there is a requirement to club both the
disclosed and undisclosed income. But that does not empower the
Commission to deal with the disclosed income before deciding to proceed
with the petition.
In view of the position indicated above, relating to the first question
considered by the Commission, the second question does not really survive.
The position is indisputable that the liability exists and does not get
automatically set aside.
Coming to the third question, the answer is provided in Anjum’s case
(supra). Wherever the Act provides for waiver of interest, the Commission
can in appropriate cases direct waiver or reduction of the interest. It has to be
noted that waiver or reduction of interest under Section 220(2A) and other
provisions is hedged with certain conditions. If these conditions are satisfied,
the Commission has the power to direct waiver or reduction. In view of this
answer, the Commission has to examine whether the assessee has made out a
case for waiver or reduction.
At this juncture, assessee’s plea that there is no scope for double levy
of interest; (i) for non payment of advance tax for which interest is
chargeable under Section 234B of the Act and (ii) for delay in payment of
the amount of interest, if any, payable in terms of Section 245D(2C) or
Section 246D(6A) needs to be considered. There can be no dispute that
double levy of interest is not permissible. But this principle is applicable
only when the interest is chargeable more than once for same set of
infractions. If the provisions under which interests are charged operate in
different fields, there is no statutory bar on levying the interest, because in
essence it does not amount to double levy of interest but levy of interest
separately for different infractions. Section 234B, Section 245D(2C) and
Section 245D(6A) operate in different fields. Section 234B comes into
operation when there is default in payment of advance tax. Liability to pay
interest under Section 245D(2C) arises when additional amount of income-
tax is not paid within time specified under sub-section (2A). Section
245D(6A) fastens liability to pay interest when tax payable in pursuance of
an order under sub-section (4) is not paid within the specified time.
Therefore, when interest is charged in respect of the said provisions it does
not amount to double levy of interest, as the infractions are different.
To put it differently, the interests charged in terms of Sections 234A,
B and C become payable on the income already disclosed in the returns
filed, together with the income disclosed before the Commission. The
concerned interest as aforesaid shall be on the consolidated amount of
income, i.e. both disclosed and undisclosed. As indicated above, such
interests shall be charged till the Commission acts in terms of Section 245D.
Thereafter, the prescription relating to charging of interests etc. becomes
operative, after the Commission allows the application for settlement to be
proceeded with. In such event, there is no further charge of interest in terms
of Sections 234A, B and C. The interest charged in terms of Section 245D is
a separate levy and not in terms of interest chargeable under Sections 234A,
B and C. Therefore, the apprehension that there is scope for charging of
interest on interest is without any basis.
The appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above.