Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 2
PETITIONER:
BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
M/S. ALLIED REFRACTORIES (PVT.) LTD.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/01/1996
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
G.B. PATTANAIK (J)
CITATION:
JT 1996 (2) 381 1996 SCALE (2)125
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
O R D E R
Leave granted.
Though the respondents have been served twice and
respondents 1, 2 and 6 were again served on September 22,
1995, they are not appearing either in person or through
counsel. Acknowledgments from respondents 3, 4 and 5 for the
second occasion have not been received. We, therefore,
declare that they are deemed to have been served.
The only question is: whether the respondents are
entitled to the proportionate reduction of the minimum
guaranteed amount for non-supply of the electricity due to
disruption by trippings load sheddings and power cuts etc.?
Clause [13] of the contract entered into, provides that they
are entitled to make an application in such a situation and
the Board would consider and pass appropriate orders in that
behalf. Admittedly, the respondents had not made such an
application, but straightway approached the High Court for
the relief. The High Court in the impugned order dated
August, 16, 1988 in C.W.J.C. No. 1480 of 1988 directed the
appellant to grant them proportionate reduction. The
controversy is no longer res integra. This Court in Bihar
State Electricity Board & Anr. vs. M/s. Dhanawat Rice & Oil
Mills, [(1989) 1 SCC 452] arising from the appellant-Board
itself had held that under Section 49, an agreement had been
entered into by the consumer with the appellant to pay
minimum guarantee of charges to the Board. On failure to
consume the minimum guaranteed level of electricity due to
non-supply of electricity by trippings, load sheddings or
power cuts, the consumer would be entitled to make an
application for proportionate reduction of the minimum
guarantee. Since respondents had not made such an
application, the High Court was not justified in
straightaway allowing the writ petitions and directing the
grant of the proportionate reduction. The order is set
aside. This order does not preclude the respondents to make
application accordingly under Section 49 of the Electricity
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 2
Supply Act and it would be open to the appellant-Board to
consider and pass appropriate orders within a reasonable
time form the date of making the application.
The appeal is accordingly allowed, but, in the
circumstances, without costs.