Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 5
PETITIONER:
HUKAM CHAND MILLS LTD. INDORE
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAY
DATE OF JUDGMENT19/03/1976
BENCH:
KHANNA, HANS RAJ
BENCH:
KHANNA, HANS RAJ
GOSWAMI, P.K.
CITATION:
1976 AIR 2078 1976 SCR (3) 712
1976 SCC (3) 10
ACT:
Income Tax Act 1922-Sales effected by a Company in
erstwhile state in British India-Determination of the
quantum of profits on the sales effected in British India
and the basis of apportionment of the profits in the absence
of any statutory or fixed formula should be based on
relevant material.
HEADNOTE:
The assessee appellant is a public limited company
owning textile Mills at Indore and carrying on the business
of manufacture and sale of textiles. During the assessment
year 1942-43, it effected in British India the following
categories of sales viz. (a) sales canvassed by the
company’s representatives amounting to Rs. 6,46,028, (b)
sales canvassed through brokers and agents in British India
Merchants and their brokers during their visit at Indore
amounting to Rs. 2,86,224 and (iv) Sales to British Indian
Merchants at the time of their own or their brokers visit at
Indore amounting to Rs. 2,55,916/-.
In 1968(1) S.C.R. 47, on an appeal, by Revenue, arising
out of a reference u/s 66(1) of the Income Tax Act, this
court held that the income by way of the Sales of Rs.
14,80,059/- in respect of the appellant company was income
"accrued or arose" within British India and a proportionate
part of it was assessable to Indian Income Tax. This court
remitted the case to the High Court to answer the reference
regarding the correctness of the determination of the
profits on the sales computed by the Tribunal by application
of Rule 33 and also whether 1/3 of the profits so determined
could be said to accrue or arise in British India, which the
High Court answered in favour of the Revenue. In the appeals
before this Court it was found that the High Court had not
taken into account the relevant circumstances for answering
the reference since it was contended by both the parties
that Rule 33 was not applicable to the facts of the case. As
per the directions, the Tribunal submitted a supplementary
statement of the case wherein it found (1) that in respect
of the sales canvassed by the companies representatives and
through brokers and agents amounting to Rs. 9,37,919 it was
just and equitable to apportion 15% of the profits said to
have arisen and accrued in British India and (ii) that in
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 5
respect of the sales to British Indian Merchants and/or
their brokers during their visit at Indore amounting to Rs.
5,42,140/-. 7 1/2 per cent of the profits could be said to
have accrued and arisen in British India. As the profits
were found to represent 31.12 per cent of the turnover, the
profits in respect of the turnover of Rs. 9,37,919 were
calculated at the rate of 4 1/2 per cent (i.e. 15% of 31.12
per cent) which amounted to Rs. 42,200/-. Similarly the
profits in respect of the turnover of 5,42,140/- @ the rate
of 2 1/4% (7 1/2 per cent of 31.12 per cent) amounted to Rs.
12,200. The total profits for the year 1942-43 was Rs.
54,400 (Rs. 42,200+12,200), according to the Tribunal.
Accepting the appeals, the Court,
^
HELD: (i) The question as to what proportion of the
profits of the sales in the four categories arose or accrued
in British India is essentially one of fact depending upon
the circumstances of the case. In the absence of some
statutory or other fixed formula; any finding on the
question of proportion involves same element of guess work.
The endeavour can only be to be approximate and there cannot
in the very nature of things be great precision and
exactness in the matter. As long as the proportion fixed by
the Tribunal is based upon the relevant material, it should
not be disturbed. [716C-D]
(ii) In the instant case, the profit which arose and
accrued in British India to the assessee-appellant for the
assessment year 1942-43 was Rs. 54,400. It
713
is just and equitable to apportion 15% of the profits of
sales in categories (a) and (b) and 7 1/2 per cent of the
profits of sales in categories (c) and (d) as accruing or
arising in British India. [716D-E]
JUDGMENT:
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 1062-
1066 (NT) of 1970.
From the Judgment and Order dated the 31st January/1st
February 1968 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in
Income-Tax Reference No. 5 of 1961.
S. T. Desai, A. K. Verma (Mrs), and J. B. Dadachanji
for the Appellant.
B. Sen and S. P. Nayar; for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
KHANNA, J.-This judgment would dispose of five civil
appeals No. 1062 to 1066 which arise out of references under
section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 made at the
instance of the assessee-appellant.
The assessee-appellant, Hukam Chand Mills Ltd. Indore,
is a public limited company. It owns a textile mill at
Indore and carries on the business of manufacture and sale
of textiles. These appeals have a long history and are
concerned with the income of the appellant during the
calendar years 1941, 1942, 1944, 1945 and 1946, the relevant
assessment years for which were 1942-43, 1943-44, 1945-46,
1946-47 and 1947-48. In those years the assessee effected
sales of textiles to merchants in the then British India.
Question which arose for consideration was as to what part
of the income arising out of those sale transactions accrued
or arose in British India. As the questions of law involved
in each of the appeals were identical, the facts relating to
the assessment year 1942-43 only were taken into
consideration. According to the finding of the Income-tax
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 3 of 5
Officer in that year the price of the textiles sold by the
assessee in British India aggregated to Rs. 14,80,059. This
amount consisted of the following four categories:
(a) Sales in pursuance of business
canvassed by company’s represen
tatives in British India, also
described as item
(3) Rs. 6,46,028
(b) Sales to British Indian merchants
through brokers and agents in British
India, also described as item
(4) Rs. 2,91,891
(c) Sales to British Indian merchants and
brokers during their visit to Indore,
also described as item
(5) Rs. 2,86,224
(d) Sales to British Indian merchants at
the time of their own or their
broker’s visit at Indore, also
described as item
(9) Rs. 2,55,916
_____________
TOTAL Rs. 14,80,059
Profits from those sales were held at 31.12 per cent to
amount to Rs. 4,60,560. Profits attributable to operations
carried out in British India were held by the Appellate
Assistant Commissioner to be one-third of Rs. 4,60,560, i.e.
Rs. 1,53,520. In doing so the Appellate Assistant
Commissioner acted upon the analogy of rule 33 of the
714
Indian Income-tax Rules, 1922. We need not set out the
finding of the Income-tax Officer. The Tribunal
substantially agreed with the Appellate Assistant
Commissioner. At the instance of the assessee the following
two questions were inter alia referred to the High Court:
"(2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances
of the applicants’ case, the Tribunal was
right in holding that in respect of sales of
Rs. 14,80,059/- the profit was correctly
determined by application of rule 33 and one-
third of the profits so determined could be
said to accrue or arise in British India ?
(3) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances
of the applicants’ case, the Tribunal was
right in holding that a proportionate part of
the profits determined on sales grouped under
items 3, 4, 5 and 9 in the assessment order
by the application of rule 33 was assessable
to income-tax?"
The High Court answered question No. (3) in favour of the
assessee. In view of its finding on question No. (3), the
High Court did not answer question No. (2). The Commissioner
of Income-tax then came up in appeal to this Court, and the
decision of this Court is reported in 67 I.T.R. 79 = [1968]
(1) S.C.R. 47. This Court held that the answer to question
No. (3) should be in the negative as the property in goods
passed to the purchaser in British India and proportionate
part of the profits of these sales accrued in British India
and as such was assessable to Indian income-tax. The case
was remitted to the High Court to answer question No. (2) in
accordance with law. On remand the High Court held that the
profits were correctly determined by the application of rule
33 and one-third of the profits so determined could be said
to arise or accrue in British India. When the matter came up
in appeal before this Court, it was found that the High
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 4 of 5
Court had not taken into account the relevant circumstances
for answering question No. (2). It was also stated by
counsel for both the parties that rule 33 was not applicable
to the facts of the case. This Court accordingly directed
the Appellate Tribunal to submit a supplementary statement
of the case to this Court. Supplementary statement of the
case has now been received.
The Tribunal found that in respect of the sales in
categories (a) and (b) amounting to Rs. 9,37,919, it was
just and equitable to apportion 15 per cent of the profits
said to have arisen and accrued in British India. Regarding
sales in categories (c) and (d) for a total amount of Rs.
5,42,140, the Tribunal held that 7 1/2 per cent of the
profits could be said to have accrued and arisen in British
India. As the profits were found to represent 31.12 per cent
of the turnover, the profits in respect of the turnover of
Rs. 9,37,919 comprised in categories (a) and (b) were
calculated at the rate of 4 1/2 per cent (i.e. 15 per cent
of 31.12 per cent). The profits in British India were thus
found to be Rs. 42,200. Profits accuring
715
and arising in British India in respect of sales turnover of
Rs. 5,42,140 comprised in categories (c) and (d) at the rate
of 2 1/4 per cent (7 1/2 per cent of 31.12 per cent) were
found to be Rs. 12,200. The total profits accruing or
arising in British India to the assessee company in the
assessment year 1942-43 were thus worked out to be Rs.
54,400. The above finding of the Tribunal has been arrived
at on consideration of the facts of the case. The modus
operandi in respect of the sales of various categories was
found by the Tribunal to be as under:
"(a) Sales of Rs. 6,46,028
(i) The assessee’s paid representatives at Bombay
canvassed the sales, on behalf of the
assessee, to merchants in British India.
(ii) The orders were sent by British Indian
merchants to the assessee at Indore.
(iii)The assessee accepted the orders at Indore,
prepared the contracts and signed them at
Indore and forwarded the same to customers in
British India.
(iv) The customers signed the contracts in British
India.
(v) The contracts were signed on company’s forms.
(vi) The contracts bore British Indian stamps.
(b) Sales of Rs. 2,91,891
(i) The brokers in British India, described as
freelance brokers, transmitted the offers to
the company at Indore.
(ii) The offers were made to the company on the
brokers’ own forms.
(iii)The brokers were not engaged by the assessee-
company and such orders were placed by the
brokers in the normal course of their
business.
(iv) The customers signed the contracts in British
India.
(c) Sales of Rs. 2,86,224
(i) These sales were made to British Indian
merchants who went to Indore to negotiate and
place orders.
(ii) The orders were accepted at Indore.
(iii)The contracts bore British Indian stamps.
(iv) The customers signed the contracts in British
India.
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 5 of 5
(d) Sales of Rs. 2,55,916
(i) These sales were made to British Indian
merchants on their or their brokers’ personal
visits to Indore.
716
(ii) The offers were taken direct at Indore.
(iii)Contracts for such sales were made in the
same manner as stated hereinbefore."
The Tribunal also gave a finding that the assessee
maintained an organisation in British India, that that
organisation was interested in bringing to the notice of the
British Indian merchants, brokers and consuming public the
goods manufactured by the assessee-company and that the
ground-work for sales effected in these groups was done in
British India.
Nothing has been urged before us either on behalf of
the assessee appellant or on behalf of the revenue-
respondent to assail the finding of the Tribunal in the
supplementary statement of case. The question as to what
proportion of the profits of the sales in categories (a),
(b), (c) and (d) arose or accrued in British India is
essentially one of fact depending upon the circumstances of
the case. In the absence of some statutory or other fixed
formula, any finding on the question of proportion involves
some element of guess work. The endeavour can only be to be
approximate and there cannot in the very nature of things be
great precision and exactness in the matter. As long as the
proportion fixed by the Tribunal is based upon the relevant
material, it should not be disturbed.
We accordingly accept the appeals, discharge the answer
given to question No. (2) by the High Court and hold that
the profit which arose and accrued in British India to the
assessee-appellant for the assessment year 1942-43 was Rs.
54,400. We also hold that it is just and equitable to
apportion 15 per cent of the profits of sales in categories
(a) and (b) as accruing or arising in British India and 7
1/2 per cent of the profits of sales in categories (c) and
(d) as accruing or arising in British India. The parties in
the circumstances shall bear their own costs.
S.R. Appeals allowed.
717