Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 1100 of 2000
PETITIONER:
Ram Bachan Rai & Ors.
RESPONDENT:
Ram Udar Rai & Ors.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/01/2006
BENCH:
ARIJIT PASAYAT & TARUN CHATTERJEE
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
The High Court of Patna dismissed the Civil Revision filed
by the appellant summarily. Challenge in the Civil Revision
was to the order passed by the learned Subordinate Judge,
VII, Patna, in execution proceedings. By the said order
Subordinate Judge held that the plea raised by the appellant
about the execution petition being barred by time in terms of
Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (in short the ’Limitation
Act’) was untenable.
Learned Subordinate Judge held that the period of
limitation starts running not from the date of decree, but when
the decree becomes enforceable i.e. when it is signed.
In support of the appeal strong reliance was placed on
several decisions of this Court i.e. W.B. Essential Commodities
Supply Corpn. v. Swadesh Agro Farming & Storage Pvt. Ltd.
and Anr. (1999 (8) SCC 315), Hameed Joharan (Dead) and
Ors. v. Abdul Salam (Dead) by Lrs. And Ors. (2001 (7) SCC
573).
In Hameed Joharan’s case (supra) it was held after
referring to the meaning to the word ’enforce’ from various
dictionaries words ’when the decree or order becomes
enforceable’ should be read in literal sense and as per
intention of the legislators 12 years period is to be reckoned
from the date the decree became enforceable i.e. the date of
the decree or order.
Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents
submitted that the correct position of law is expressed in
Shankar Balant Lokhande (Dead) by LRs. v. Chandrakant S.
Lokhande & Anr. (1995 (3) SCC 413) and in other two cases
the correct principles in law were not kept in view. We find
that there is some area of conflict amongst several two-judge
Bench decisions. It is also to be noticed that noticing the
conflict between these judgments, reference has been made to
a three-Judge Bench in Chiranji Lal (dead) by Lrs. Hari Das
(dead) by Lrs. (2005 (2) SCC 261).
This case may also be placed before Hon’ble the Chief
Justice of India for appropriate orders to be placed alongwith
Chiranji Lal’s case (supra).