Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1
PETITIONER:
STATE OF MANIPUR AND OTHERS
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
SMT.A. ONGBI MEMCHA DEVI & ANR.WITHCIVIL APPEAL NO 5712 OF 1
DATE OF JUDGMENT17/04/1995
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
HANSARIA B.L. (J)
CITATION:
1995 SCC (4) 210 1995 SCALE (3)608
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
O R D E R
Leave granted.
These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment
and order dated 22.2.1994 passed in Civil Review Application
No.17 of 1993 in C.R. No.97 of 1991 and CR 97/91 of the High
Court of Gauhati at its Bench at Imphal. One, A. Raghumani
Singh, was appointed in the service of Manipur State and he
died in harness. Therefore, his widow Smt. Arambam Ongbi
Memcha Devi, was appointed as L.D.C. on 1.1.1974 on
compassionate grounds and she was promoted as U.D.C. on
October 13, 1981. In 1991, she filed a writ petition in the
High Court for direction to appoint her brother-in law on
compassionate grounds. The writ petition was allowed by the
High Court in Civil Rule No.97 of 1991, against which a
Review Petion was also dismissed. Thus, these two appeals by
special leave. Though time was taken for filing counter by
the respondent, no counter has been filed.
The brother is not a dependent of the deceased employee
who died in harness. Since on compassionate grounds, the
widow has already been appointed and she has been continuing
in serviced they cannot claim further employment on the
basis of the death of the employee in harness. The High
Court was, therefore, not correct.
The appeals are accordingly allowed. The orders of the
High Court are set aside. In the facts and circumstances no
costs.