Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 7
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 4559-4561 of 2002
PETITIONER:
Commissioner of Custom, New Delhi
RESPONDENT:
M/s Brooks International & Ors.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/05/2007
BENCH:
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT & LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
[With C.A. Nos. 140-143 of 2004]
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
1. Since all these appeals relate to identical question, they
are taken up for disposal by this common judgment.
2. The basic issue is when the market value of goods under
export is much less than the amount of drawback claimed,
whether such goods can be confiscated for violation of the
provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short the ’Act’). In the
matters relating to CA No.4559-4561 of 2002, the respondent
had sent a consignment to the export shed of ICD, TKD, New
Delhi for exporting the same under claim for duty drawback.
On the basis of intelligence, Directorate of Revenue,
Intelligence (in short ’DRI’) detained the consignment. It was,
prima facie, noted that the goods did not appear as per
description, quantity and value disclosed in the bills. The
consignments of the respondents were examined on different
dates by DRI.
3. Consignment of R1 was examined by DRI on 7.1.1999 &
12.1.1999, Consignment of R2 was examined by DRI on
18.1.1999 & 25.1.1999, Consignment of R3 was examined by
DRI on 14.1.1999 & 08.02.1999.
4. The Commissioner of Customs directed confiscation of all
the goods under Section 113(d) and (i) of the Act and allowed
to redeem of the same on payment of fine of Rs.10,00,000/-,
disallowed the export of readymade garments and claim of
drawback. No penal action was invoked as DRI contemplated
to seek separate adjudication in respect of the penal clause
provided under the Act. Appeals were preferred before the
Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (in
short ’CEGAT’) which allowed the appeals holding that there
was no power of confiscation and there was no material placed
to record to suggest that the goods did not correspond to any
material entry made in the bills and the correctness of the
FOB and description of the goods specified in the bills had not
been disputed.
5. In support of the appeal learned counsel for the appellant
submitted that Section 113(1) (d) and & (c) apply as they deal
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 7
with three types of goods i.e. excisable goods, prohibited goods
and goods entered for exportation. Respondents attempted to
export old and used readymade garments etc which is not
permissible under Rule 3 of the Drawback Rules. The market
value was less than duty drawback which was not admissible
under Section 76(1)(b) of the Act. CEGAT has erroneously
interpreted the provisions of Section 113(d) and (c) of the Act.
The contents of the show-cause notice were not properly
analysed.
6. Learned counsel for the respondent on the other hand
supported the order of the CEGAT.
7. It is to be noted that in view of the divergence of opinion
between the several benches of the CEGAT, matter was
referred to a larger bench and the larger bench decision was
assailed by the assessee in the concerned case. Before this
Court in Om Prakash Bhati v. Commissioner of Customs,
Delhi (2003 (6) SCC 161) it was, inter alia, observed as follows:
"6. At the outset, we would state that the
learned counsel for the appellant has not
pressed for the drawback in view of specific
provision of Section 76 which inter alia
provides that no drawback shall be allowed "(b)
in respect of any goods the market-price of
which is less than the amount of drawback
due thereon". Therefore, for the purpose of
getting drawback, relevant consideration is the
market price of the goods prevailing in the
country and not the price of the goods which
the exporter expects to receive from the
overseas purchaser.
7. Next -- as the order for confiscation of goods
is passed by referring to Section 113(d) of the
Act, we would refer to the same. It reads as
under:--
"113. Confiscation of goods attempted
to be improperly exported etc.-- The
following export goods shall be liable to
confiscation:--
(d) any goods attempted to be exported or
brought within the limits of any customs
area for the purpose of being exported,
contrary to any prohibition imposed
by or under this Act or any other law
for the time being in force."
8. The aforesaid Section empowers the
authority to confiscate any goods attempted to
be exported contrary to any ’prohibition’
imposed by or under the Act or any other law
for the time being in force. Hence, for
application of the said provision, it is required
to be established that attempt to export the
goods was contrary to any prohibition imposed
under any law for the time being in force.
9. Further, Section 2(33) of the Act defines
"prohibited goods" as under:--
"prohibited goods" means any goods the
import or export of which is subject to
any prohibition under this Act or any
other law for the time being in force but
does not include any such goods in
respect of which the conditions subject to
which the goods are permitted to be
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 3 of 7
imported or exported have been complied
with."
10. From the aforesaid definition, it can be
stated that (a) if there is any prohibition of
import or export of goods under the Act or any
other law for the time being in force, it would
be considered to be prohibited goods; and (b)
this would not include any such goods in
respect of which the conditions, subject to
which the goods are imported or exported,
have been complied with. This would mean
that if the conditions prescribed for import or
export of goods are not complied with, it would
be considered to be prohibited goods. This
would also be clear from Section 11 which
empowers the Central Government to prohibit
either ’absolutely’ or ’subject to such
conditions’ to be fulfilled before or after
clearance, as may be specified in the
notification, the import or export of the goods
of any specified description. The notification
can be issued for the purposes specified in
Sub-section (2). Hence, prohibition of
importation or exportation could be subject to
certain prescribed conditions to be fulfilled
before or after clearance of goods. If conditions
are not fulfilled, it may amount to prohibited
goods. This is also made clear by this Court in
Sheikh Mohd. Omer v. Collector of
Customs, Calcutta and Ors. (1970 (2) SCC
728) wherein it was contended that the
expression ’prohibition’ used in Section 111 (d)
must be considered as a total prohibition and
that the expression does not bring within its
fold the restrictions imposed by Clause (3) of
the Import Control Order, 1955. The Court
negatived the said contention and held thus:--
"...What Clause (d) of Section 111 says is
that any goods which are imported or
attempted to be imported contrary to
"Any prohibition imposed by any law for
the time being in force in this country" is
liable to be confiscated. "Any prohibition"
referred to in that section applies to every
type of "prohibition". That prohibition
may be complete or partial. Any
restriction on import or export is to
an extent a prohibition. The expression
"any prohibition" in Section 111(d) of the
Customs Act, 1962 includes restrictions.
Merely because Section 3 of the Imports
and Exports (Control) Act, 1947, uses
three different expressions "prohibiting",
"restricting" or "otherwise controlling",
we cannot cut down the amplitude of the
word "any prohibition" in Section 111(d)
of the Act. "Any prohibition" means
every prohibition. In other words all
types of prohibitions. Restriction is one
type of prohibition. From item (I) of
Schedule I, Part IV to Import Control
Order, 1955, it is clear that import of
living animals of all sorts is prohibited.
But certain exceptions are provided for.
But nonetheless the prohibition
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 4 of 7
continues."
xxx
15. Apart from the aforesaid provision, for
finding out the true export value of the goods,
Section 14 of the Act provides relevant
procedure. Section 14 is to be read along with
Section 2(41), which defines the word ’value’.
Section 2(41) reads as under:--
"Section 2(41) -- "value", in relation to
any goods, means the value thereof
determined in accordance with the
provisions of Sub-section (1) of Section
14."
Thereafter, relevant part of Section 14 reads
thus:--
"14. Valuation of goods for purposes of
assessment. -- (1) For the purposes of
the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975)
or any other law for the time being in
force whereunder a duty of customs is
chargeable on any goods by reference to
their value, the value of such goods shall
be deemed to be--
the price at which such or like goods
are ordinarily sold, or offered for sale,
for delivery at the time and place of
importation or exportation, as the case
may be, in the course of international
trade, where the seller and the buyer
have no interest in the business of
each other and price is the sole
consideration for the sale or offer for
sale:
Provided that such price shall be
calculated with reference to the rate of
exchange as in force on the date on which
a bill of entry is presented under Section
46, or a shipping bill or bill of export, as
the case may be, is presented under
Section 50;
(1A) Subject to the provisions of Sub-
section (1), the price referred to in that
sub-section in respect of imported goods
shall be determined in accordance with
the rules made in this behalf.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained
in Sub-section (1) or Sub-section (1A) if
the Central Government is satisfied that
it is necessary or expedient so to do, it
may, by notification in the Official
Gazette, fix tariff values for any class of
imported goods or export goods, having
regard to the trend of value of such or
like goods, and where any such tariff
values are fixed, the duty shall be
chargeable with reference to such tariff
value.
(3) ..."
16. The aforesaid Section would be applicable
for determining the value of goods for the
purpose of assessment of tariff under the Act
or any other law for the time being in force
whereunder a duty of customs is chargeable
on any goods by reference to their value. In the
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 5 of 7
present case, on export of goods in question,
no duty was payable under the Act. It was,
therefore, contended that there is no scope of
application of Section 14 for determining the
value of goods by applying the criteria laid in
the said Section. In our view, this submission
cannot be accepted. For determining the
export value of the goods, we have to refer to
the meaning of the word ’value’ given in
Section 2(41) of the Act, which specifically
provides that value in relation to any goods
means the value thereof determined in
accordance with the provisions of Sub-section
(1) of Section 14. Therefore, if the export value
of the goods is to be determined, then even if
no duty is leviable, the method (mode) for
determining the value of the goods provided
under Section 14 is required to be followed.
Section 14 specifically provides that in case of
assessing the value for the purpose of export,
value is to be determined at the price at which
such or like goods are ordinarily sold or offered
for sale at the place of exportation in the
course of international trade, where the seller
and the buyer have no interest in the business
of each other and the price is the sole
consideration for sale. No doubt, Section 14
would be applicable for determining the value
of the goods for the purpose of tariff or duty of
customs chargeable on the goods. In addition,
by reference it is to be resorted to and applied
for determining the export value of the goods
as provide under Sub-section (41) of Section 2.
This is independent of any question of
assessability of the goods sought to be
exported to duty. Hence, for finding out
whether the export value is truly stated in the
shipping bill, even if no duty is leviable, it can
be referred, to for determining the true export
value of the goods sought to be exported.
17. It is true that Section 50 of the Act inter
alia provides that before exporting the goods
the exporter shall make entry thereof by
presenting to the proper officer in the case of
goods to be exported, a shipping bill and a bill
of export in prescribed form. The Shipping Bill
& Bill of Export (Form) Regulations, 1991 inter
alia prescribes the said form. After that form is
amended w.e.f. 15.6.2001, it is stated that
exporter shall stated "Value - FOB/PMV where
applicable". We are not required to deal with
this aspect in this appeal as the goods were
sought to be exported in the year 1998.
18. From the aforesaid provisions, mainly,
Section 2(41) read with Section 14 of the Act
and Section 18 of the Foreign Exchange
Regulation Act, 1973, it is crystal clear that:--
(a) Exporter has to declare full export
value of the goods (sale consideration for
the goods exported).
(b) Exporter has to affirm that the full
export value of the goods will be received
in the prescribed manner.
(c) If the full export value of the goods is
not ascertainable, the value which the
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 6 of 7
exporter expects to receive on the sale of
the goods in the overseas market.
(d) Exporter has to declare true or correct
export value of the goods, that is to say,
correct sale consideration of the goods.
Criterion under Section 14 of the Act is
the price at which such or other goods
are ordinarily sold or offered for sale in
the course of international trade where
the seller and buyer have no interest in
the business of each other and the price
is the sole consideration for sale or offer
for sale.
19. To the same effect, Rule 11 of the Foreign
Trade (Development and Regulation) Rules,
1993 provides. This Rule is to be read along
with Section 11(1) of the Foreign Trade
(Development & Regulation) Act, 1992, which
inter alia provides that no export or import
shall be made by any person except in
accordance with the provisions of this act, the
rules and the orders made thereunder and the
export and import policy for the time being in
force. Rule 11 reads thus:--
"11. Declaration as to value and
quality of imported goods.--On the
importation into, or exportation out of,
any customs ports of any goods, whether
liable to duty or not, the owner of such
goods shall in the bill of entry or the
shipping bill or any other documents
prescribed under the Customs Act, 1962
(52 of 1962), state the value, quality and
description of such goods to the best of
his knowledge and belief and in case of
exportation of goods, certify that the
quality and specification of the goods
as stated in those documents are in
accordance with the terms of the
export contract entered into with the
buyer or consignee in pursuance of which
the goods are being exported and shall
subscribe to a declaration of the truth of
such statement at the foot of such bill of
entry or shipping bill or any other
documents."
20. Hence, in cases where the export value is
not correctly stated, but there is intentional
over-invoicing for some other purpose, that is
to say, not mentioning true sale consideration
of the goods, then it would amount to violation
of the conditions for import / export of the
goods. The purpose may be money laundering
or some other purpose, but it would certainly
amount to illegal/unauthorised money
transaction. In any case, over-invoicing of the
export goods would result in illegal/irregular
transactions in foreign currency."
8. It would be appropriate for the CEGAT which had not
considered the effect of the larger bench judgment, which had
approval of this Court in Om Parkash case (supra) to rehear
the appeals. We, therefore, set aside the order of the CEGAT
and remit the matter to it for fresh consideration keeping in
view the principles set out in the Om Parkash case (supra).
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 7 of 7
9. The appeals are allowed to the aforesaid extent.
C.A. Nos. 140-143 of 2004
10. The factual position is almost identical to those involved in
C.A. Nos. 4559-4561 OF 2002 except that in the instant case
the appellant had filed an application for review which was
rejected.
11. Following the view expressed in the connected civil appeals
we allow these appeals and remit the matter to CEGAT for fresh
consideration. It is to be noted that CEGAT is presently known
as Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
12. Appeals are allowed.