Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 8
PETITIONER:
NARAYAN BHONDOO PIMPUTKAR & ANOTHER .
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
LAXMAN PURSHOTTAM PIMPUTKAR & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT30/10/1973
BENCH:
KHANNA, HANS RAJ
BENCH:
KHANNA, HANS RAJ
KRISHNAIYER, V.R.
SARKARIA, RANJIT SINGH
CITATION:
1974 AIR 111 1974 SCR (2) 116
1974 SCC (1) 11
ACT:
Gujarat Patel Watans Abolition Act, 1961 (Gujarat Act 48 of
1961). s. 4 Abolition of ’Patel watans’- Right of watandar
to execute decree for possession of land, it affected.
HEADNOTE:
On the question whether, the right to execute a decree for
the possession of watan land which has been obtained by the
watandar came to an end, because of the abolition by the
Gujarat Patel Watans Abolition Act. 1961, of patel watans
and the extinguishment of all incidents appertaining to them
under s. 4 of, the Act,
HELD : (1) There is nothing in the language of s. 4 which
renders such decrees for possession to be in executable.
Had the legislature intended that such decrees should become
in-executable, the legislature would have indicated .such
intention by incorporating some provision to that effect.
[121B]
(2) The words "any decree or order of a Court" in the
opening clause of the section do not indicate that the
decree or order of court could not be executed with effect
from the appointed day. The opening clause of the section
only indicates that irrespective of any usage or custom and
irrespective of any settlement, grant, agreement, sanad or
decree or order of a court or the existing watan law. which
might have defined and declared the incidents appertaining
to patel watans, the results contemplated by the various
clauses of the section would follow and nothing contained in
such settlement etc. would prevent the operation of that
section. [122E-123A]
(3) If the fact that patel watans have been abolished and
incidents appertaining to them have, been extinguished does,
not lead to the conclusion that the right of the erstwhile
watandar to the possession of the watan lands also comes to
an end. Section 4(iv) expressly provides that the
resumption of watan land consequent upon the abolition of
patel watans would be subject to the provisions of sections
6, 7 and 10, According to s. 6, the watan land. subject to
the conditions mentioned in that section, shall be regranted
to the watandar. He shall be deemed to be occupant of the
said land, and he would be entitled to continue in
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 8
possession if he complies with the provisions of that
section. That is, so far as the quondam watandars are
concerned, they are entitled to be in possession of the
watan lands, though not in their capacity as watandars but
by virtue of the operation of s. 6 of the Act. If the
respondent would be entitled to be in possession of the land
under s. 6, the right to execute the decree for possession
of land cannot be denied to him. [121C-122]
(4) If the respondent is entitled to execute the decree for
possession of the land obtained against the appellants the
question whether the appellants, if allowed to remain in
possession, could have applied for regrant to them under s.
10 is not relevant. [122C-E]
JUDGMENT:
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1573(N) of
1972.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated
the 3rd February, 1971 of the Gujarat High Court at
Ahmedabad in Second Appeal No.639 of 1968.
V. S. Desai, P. C. Bhartari and A. G. Meneses, for the
appellants.
D. V. Patel, P. H. Parekh and Sunanda Bhandare, for
respondent No. 1.
S. K. Dholakia and M. N. Shroff, for respondent No. 2.
D. N. Mishra, for respondents Nos. 3a to 3d.
117
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
KHANNA, J.-Whether the decree for the possession of the land
in dispute awarded in favour of Laxman Purshottam Pimputkar
respondent No. 1 (hereinafter described as the respondent
has become inexecutable after the coming into force of the
Gujarat Patel Watans Abolition Act, 1961 (Gujarat Act 48 of
1961) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is the short
question which arises for determination in this appeal
brought by special leave against the judgment of the Gujarat
High Court.
The appellants and the respondent belong to one family. The
respondent represents the seniormost branch of the family.
The family was granted Patilki Watan in a number of
villages, including Solsumbha, in district Thana. The watan
land situated in Solsumbha is the subject matter of the
present dispute. Under the Bombay Hereditary Offices Act,
1874 the person who actually performs the duty of a
hereditary office for the time being is called an
officiator. Purshottam, father of the respondent, was the
officiator till 1921 when, because of a disqualification
incurred by him, a deputy was appointed in place of
Purshottam. After the death of Purshottam in 1940, the
respondent became the officiator the branch of the
appellants claimed to be ill possession of the watan land in
dispute and some other lands under a partition effected in
1914. In 1944 the respondent moved the government for
resumption of the, watan land in dispute which was in
possession of the branch of the appellants. Prayer was also
made by the respondent that he might be delivered possession
of the land. The government after some enquiry resumed that
land by order dated October 9, 1946 and directed that
possession of the same be restored to the respondent. The
appellants thereafter moved the government for
reconsideration of that order. The government on May 2,
1947 modified its previous order by directing that the.
appellants could continue to retain the possession of the
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 3 of 8
land in dispute subject to payment of rent as might be fixed
by the government from time to time. The respondent
thereupon instituted suit for a declaration that the order
of the government dated May 2,1947 and an ancillary order
dated March 1, 1949 were null, void and inoperative. Prayer
was also made that the appellants should remove all
obstructions and hindrances from the land in dispute and
should hand over the possession of the same to the
respondent. It was further prayed that the appellants
should render account of the income, of the land to the
respondent. The suit was resisted by the appellants on the
ground that the impugned orders were administrative orders
and no suit could lie for setting them aside. The suits
were also stated to be barred by limitation. The trial
court decreed the suit in favour of the respondent. On
appeal the District Judge set aside the decreed in favour of
the respondent. The decision of the District Judge was
affirmed on second appeal by the High Court. The respondent
then came up in appeal to this Court by special leave. This
Court as per its judgment dated December 13, 1962, reported
in, (1964) 1 S.C.R. 200, accepted the appeal of the
respondent and set aside the judgment of the High Court and
the District Judge and restored that of the trial court
whereby decree for possession of the land in dispute had
been awarded in favour of the respondent against the
appellants.
118
In the meanwhile in 1960 the State of Bombay was bifurcated
and the land in dispute which was earlier part of Bombay
State became part of the State of Gujarat. On April 1, 1963
the Act came into force. On July 19, 1966 the respondent
filed an application to execute the, decree for possession
of the land which-had been awarded in his favour. Objection
was then taken by the appellants that the decree awarded in
favour of the respondent had become inexecutable because of
the coming into force of the Act. This objection found
favour with the executing court which consequently dismissed
the execution application. Appeal filed by the respondent
against the order of the executing court was dismissed by
the District Judge Bulsar. The respondent thereafter filed
second appeal before the Gujarat High Court. The High Court
came to the conclusion that the respondent was entitled to
execute the decree for possession of the land obtained by
him against the appellants. Appeal of the respondent was
accordingly allowed. The appellants have thereafter come up
in appeal to this Court by special leave.
The question which arises for determination, as stated
earlier, is whether the decree for possession of the land in
dispute which was awarded in favour of the respondent has
become inexecutable because of the coming into force of the
Act. It would, therefore, been to refer to the relevant
provisions of the Act. Section 2 contains the definitions.
According to section 2(7), "hereditary patelship" means
every village office of a revenue or police patel held
hereditarily under the existing watan law for the
performance of duties connected with the administration or
collection of the public revenue of a village or with the
village police, or with the settlement of boundaries or
other matters of civil administration of a village and
includes such office even where the services originally
appertaining to it have ceased to be demanded. Section
2(11) defines "patel watan" to mean a watan held under the
existing watan law for the performance of duties
appertaining to the hereditary patelship whether any
commutation settlement in respect of such patel watan has or
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 4 of 8
has not been effected. "Unauthorised holder" has been
defined in section 2(14) to mean a person in session of a
watan land without any right or under a lease, mortgage
sale, gift or any other kind of transfer thereof, which is
null and void under the existing watan law. "Watan",
according to section 2(15), means watan property, if any,
together with the hereditary office and the rights and
privileges attached ’to it. Section 2(16) defines "watandar"
to mean a person having hereditary interest in a patel watan
under the existing watan law and includes a matadar and ’a
representative watandar. Section 2(17) defines "watan land"
to mean the land forming part of the watan property.
According to section 2(18). "watan property" means the
movable or immovable property held, acquired or assigned
under the existing watan law for providing remuneration for
the performance of the duty appertaining to a hereditary
patelship and includes a right under the existing watan law
to levy customary fees or perquisites in money or in kind,
whether at fixed times or otherwise and also includes cash
payments in addition to the original watan property made
voluntarily by the State Government and subject
periodically,to motion or withdrawal.
119
Section 3 gives, powers to the Collector, to decide various
questions arising under the Act including the question
whether any land is watan land and whether a person is,
watandar or authorised holder or unauthorised holder. Right
is also given to a person aggrieved by the order of the
Collector to file appeal to the State Government Section 4
has material bearing and reads as under :
"4. Notwithstanding any usage or custom or
anything contained in any settlement, grant,
agreement, sanad, or any decree or order of a
court or the existing watan law, with ,effect
on and from the appointed day,-
(i) all patel watans shall be and are hereby
abolished;
(ii) all incidents (including the right to
hold office and
watan property, the right to levy customary
fees or perquisites in money or in kind, and
the liability to render service) appertaining
to the said watans shall be, and are hereby
extinguished;
(iii) no office of patel shall be, hereditary;
and
(iv) subject to the provisions of sections 6,
7 and 10 all watan land shall be and is hereby
resumed and shall be subject to the payment of
land revenue under the provisions of the Code
and the rules made thereunder as if it were an
unalienated land :
Provided that such resumption shall not affect
the validity of any alienation of such watan
land made in accordance with the provisions of
the existing watan law or of the rights of an
alienee thereof or any person claiming under
or through him."
Section 5 deals with resumption of watan land which is not a
grant of soil and is held subject to a total or partial
exemption from payment of land revenue thereof. We are, in
the present case not concerned with such watan land.
According to section 6, watan land to which the provisions
of section 5 do not apply shall, in cases not falling under
section 7 or section 10 be regranted to the watandar of the
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 5 of 8
watan to which it appertained on payment by or on behalf of
the watandar to the State Government of the occupancy price
equal to six times the amount of the full assessment of such
land within the prescribed period and in the prescribed
manner and the watandar shall be deemed to be occupant
within the meaning of the Code in respect of such land and
shall primarily be liable to pay land revenue to the State
Government in accordance with the provisions of the Code and
the rules made thereunder; and all the provisions of the
Code and the said rules relating to unalienated land shall
subject to the provisions of this Act, apply to the said
land.
Section 7 deals with the regrant of watan land to
authorised holders. According to the section, any watan
land other than land to which the provisions of section 5
apply held by an authorised holder shall be regranted to him
on payment by him or on his behalf
120
to the State Government of the occupany price mentioned in
section 6 and subject to the like conditions and
consequences and all the provisions of section 6 shall apply
mutatis mutandis in relation to the regrant of the, land
under this section to the authorised holder as if were the
watandar. Section 10 provides that where any watan land is
in possession of an unauthorised holder, he shall be
summarily evicted therefrom by the Collector in accordance
with the provisions of the Code : Provided that if the State
Government is of opinion that in view of the investment made
by such bolder in the development of the land or in the non-
agricultural use of the land or otherwise, his eviction will
cause undue hardship to him, it may direct the Collector to
regrant the land to such holder on payment of such amount
and subject to such terms and conditions as the State
Government may determine and the Collector shall regrant the
land accordingly. It is further provided in the section
that watan land unless regranted under the section shall be
disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the Bombay
Land Revenue Code applicable to disposal of unoccupied
unalienated land. Section 22 contains the saving clause and
reads as under
"22. Nothing contained in this Act shall affect
(i) any obligation or liability already
incurred under an incident of a patel watan
before the appointed by, or
(ii) any proceeding or remedy in respect of
such obligation or liability, and any such
proceeding may be continued or any such remedy
may be enforced as if this Act had not been
passed."
Mr. Dasai on behalf of the appellants has contended before
us that in view of the provisions contained in section 4
of the Act, the decree for the possession of the land in
dispute awarded in favour of the respondent has become
inexecutable. it is submitted that as the decree was awarded
in favour of the respondent in his capacity as a watandar
and as patel watans have been abolished, the respondent
cannot obtain the possession of the land to which he was
entitled as a watandar’ This stand has been controverted by
Mr. Patel on behalf of the respondent and he submits that
there is nothing in the language of section 4 which renders
the decree for the possession of the land in dispute
inexecutable. In any case, according to Mr. Patel, the
right of the respondent to execute the decree and the
liability of the appellants to hand over possession of the
land to the respondent under the decree have been kept
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 6 of 8
intact by section 22 of the Act.
The provisions of section 4 of the Act have been reproduced
above and it is manifest therefrom that with effect from the
appointed day, viz, April 1, 1963 all patel watans are
abolished and all incidents appertaining to the said watans
are extinguished. It is further provided that as from the
appointed day no office of patel shall be hereditary and
that subject to the provisions of section 6, 7 and 1 0 all
watan lands are resumed and would be subject to the, payment
of land revenue. The question with which we are concerned
is whether the
121
right to execute the decree for the possession of watam land
which has been obtained by the watandar against other
persons comes to an end because of the abolition of patel
watans and the extinguishment of all incidents appertaining
to the said watans. The answer to this question, in our
opinion, should be in the negative. There is nothing in the
language of section 4 which renders Such decrees for
possession to be inexecutable. Had the legislature intended
that the decrees for possession of the watan lands which had
been obtained by the watandars against third persons should
become inexecutable, the legislature would have indicated
such an intention by incorporating some provision to that
effect. In the absence of any such provision, it is not
permissible to read ’a prohibition in section 4 of the Act
’On the execution of a decree for possession of the watan
land obtained in favour of the watandar.
The fact that patel watans have been abolished ’and
incidents. appertaining to the watans have been extinguished
does not lead to the conclusion that the right of the
erstwhile watandar to the possession of the watan lands also
comes to an end. Indeed, clause (iv) of section 4 of the
Act expressly provides that the resumption of watan land
consequent upon the abolition of patel watans and the
extinguishment of incidents appertaining to the said watans
would be subject to the provisions of sections 6, 7 and 10.
According to section 6, the watan land, subject to the
conditions mentioned in that section,’shall be regranted to
the watandar of the watan and he shall be deemed to be
occupant of the said land. The watandar would be entitled
to continue to be in possession of the watan lands, if he
complies with the provisions of that section despite the
abolition of patel watans and the extinguishment of
incidents appertaining to the said watans. The object of
the Act as would appear from its preamble was to abolish
patel watans because its hereditary character smacked of
some kind of feudalism. At the same time, the legislature
made it clear that it was not intended to deprive the
watandar of the possession of the land if he complied with
the conditions laid down in section 6 of the Act. It,
therefore, cannot be said that there was a severance of all
connections between the watandar and the watan land because
of the abolition of patel watans and the extinguishment of
incidents appertaining to such watans. A residual right was
still there in the erstwhile watandar and that included the
right to retain possession of watan land if the conditions
mentioned in section 6 were complied with. Section 7 of the
Act contains provisions for regrant of watan lands to
authorised holders. while section 10 provides for eviction
of unauthorised, holders. Provision is also made for regrant
of the land by the State Government to unauthorised holders
if the Government forms the opinion that his eviction would
cause undue hardship to him.
It would follow from a combined reading of sections 4, 6 7
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 7 of 8
and 10 of the Act that a watandar on the abolition of patel
watans and extinguishment-of the incidents appertaining to
the watans does not automatically lose his right to
possession of the watan lands. The same is. true of an
authorised holder. Their right to retain possession of
122
watan land as long as they comply with the prescribed
conditions is .statutorily recognised. The position of a
watandar and an authorised holder is in marked contrast to
that of an unauthorised holder who can be summarily evicted
from the watan lands by the Collector under section 10 of
the Act. So far as quondam watandars are concerned, they
are entitled to be in possession of the watan lands not in
their capacity as watandars but by virtue of the operation
of section 6 of the Act. Likewise, the authorised holders
are entitled to be in possession by virtue of section 7 of
the Act. If the respondent is entitled to be in possession
of the land in dispute under section 6 of the Act, the right
to execute the decree for possession of the land can plainly
be not denied to him on account of the provisions of the
Act.
According to Mr. Desai, if the appellants are not
dispossessed from the land in dispute in execution of the
decree obtained by the respondent against them, the
appellants can ’approach the State Government for regrant of
the land in dispute to them because their eviction would
cause undue hardship to them. It is, in our opinion, not
necessary for the purpose, of the present case to go into
the question whether the appellants can claim regrant of the
land under section 10 of the Act because this question does
not materially affect the right of the respondent to execute
the decree for possession of the land in dispute obtained by
him against the appellants. If the respondent is entitled
to execute the decree for possession of the land obtained
against the appellants, in that event the question whether
the appellants, if allowed to remain in possession, could
have applied for regrant of the land to them, is hardly of
any relevance.
Reference has been made by Mr. Desai to the words "any
decree or order of a court" in the opening clause of section
4 of the Act. It is urged that those words indicate that
the decree or order of a court can also be not executed with
effect from the appointed day. This ,contention, in our
opinion, is not well-founded. What is contemplated by the
opening clause of section 4 of the, Act is that not-
withstanding any usage or custom or anything contained in
any settlement, grant, agreement, sanad, or any decree or
order of a court or the existing law with effect from the
appointed day, the results mentioned in the various clauses
of that section would follow. The words "any decree or
order of a court" are preceded by the words "anything conta
ined in any settlement, grant, agreement, sanad". It
is a well established rule in construction of statutes that
general terms following particular ones apply only to such perso
ns or things as are ejusdem generis with those
comprehended ’in the language of the Legislature,. In other
words, the general expression is to be read as comprehending
only,things of the same kind as that designated by the
preceding particular expressions, unless there is something
to show that a under -sense was intended.(see p. 297 of
Maxwell on the Interpretation of Statutes Twelfth Edition).
In our opinion, the opening clause of section 4 indicates
that irrespective of any usage or custom and irrespective of
any settlement, grant, agreement, sanad, or decree or ,order
of a court or the, existing watan law, which-might have
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 8 of 8
defined ,and declared the incidents appertaining to patel
watans. the results contemplated by the various clauses of
section 4 would follow and
123
nothing contained in the settlement, grant, agreement,
sanad, or decree or order of the court or the existing watan
law would prevent the operation of that section.
In view of what has been held above, it is, in our opinion,
not necessary to deal with the alternative argument of Mr.
Patel that the execution proceedings taken by the.
respondent to recover possession of the land were also
protected by section 22 of the Act.
Reference has been made by Mr. Desai to a Full Bench
decision of Nagpur High Court in the case of Chhote Khan v.
Mohammad Obedulla Khan(1). It was held by the majority in
that case that after the coming into force of the M.P.
Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated
Lands) Act, 1950 the preemption decrees obtained by
landlords are no longer executable because the persons
seeking to enforce them have lost their proprietary
interest. The aforesaid case cannot be of any help to the,
appellants because it has been conceded by Mr. Desai that
there were no provisions in the above mentioned Madhya
Pradesh Act corresponding to sections 6, 7 and 10 of the Act
with which we are concerned. It is also consequently not
necessary to express any opinion about the correctness of
the view taken by the majority in the above mentioned Full
Bench decision.
There is, in our opinion, no merit in this appeal which is
accordingly dismissed with costs.
V.P.S. Appeal dismissed.
(1) A.I.R. 1953,Nag. 361.
124