T.N.RAGHUPATHY vs. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA .

Case Type: Civil Appeal

Date of Judgment: 26-03-2015

Preview image for T.N.RAGHUPATHY vs. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA .

Full Judgment Text

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2014 (For correction/modification of appearance in Order dated 08.12.2014 and Judgment dated 16.12.2014 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.11439 OF 2014 T.N.RAGHUPATHY ... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA & ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R Mr. Vikas Mehta, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant-Respondent No.4 has submitted that Shri Aditya Sondhi, learned senior counsel, had in fact not appeared in the matter and yet his name has been recorded in the order as well as appearance shown in the proceedings. JUDGMENT He has further submitted that the name of the learned counsel has been recorded because a mistake had been committed in the appearance slip submitted by the th th learned Advocate-on-Record on 8 and 16 December, 2014. Though Shri Aditya Sondhi had not appeared, his name had been stated in the appearance slip and therefore, his name is recorded in the Judgment as well as in the appearance. 1 PageĀ 1 So as to support his submission, an affidavit has been filed by the learned counsel. In view of the above fact and on the basis of the affidavit filed by the learned counsel, the payer made in the application is granted and it is ordered that name of Shri Aditya Sondhi, learned senior counsel be deleted th from the proceedings dated 8 December, 2014 as well as th from the Judgment dated 16 December, 2014 in Civil Appeal No.11439/2014. ..............J. [ANIL R. DAVE] ..............J. [KURIAN JOSEPH] New Delhi; th 26 March, 2015. JUDGMENT 2 PageĀ 2