Full Judgment Text
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1
PETITIONER:
JAIN SPINNERS LED.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/12/1997
BENCH:
CJI, B.N. KIRPAL
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
Verma, CJI.
In the present case the fact that certified copy of the
order dated 13.04.92 passed by the Assistant Collector was
applied by the appellant no 9.5.93, is of no consequence. As
mentioned in the Tribunal’s order it was not in dispute that
the order dated 13.04.92 was served upon the appellants
herein on 20.04.92 by delivery of the same to the counsel
for the appellants in the High Court. That being so the
appellants cannot claim the benefit of the exclusion of the
time taken for obtaining a certified copy thereafter. The
appeal filed to the Collector by the appellant was.
therefore, rightly dismissed as time barred on 19.10.95. The
appeal is accordingly, dismissed.