PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs. PNB CANTEEN WORKERS UNION (CALCUTTA)&ORS

Case Type: Civil Appeal

Date of Judgment: 25-09-2018

Preview image for PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs. PNB CANTEEN WORKERS UNION (CALCUTTA)&ORS

Full Judgment Text

NON­REPORTABLE  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  Civil Appeal  No.  5112/2017 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK                               Appellant(s)                                 VERSUS PNB CANTEEN WORKERS UNION (CALCUTTA)&ORS           Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T KURIAN J. 1. In this hotly contested appeal, the surviving issue is solely with regard to the claims made by the 29 canteen workers whether they   are   represented   through   the   union   or   otherwise,   for absorption. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the Bank and having heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the workmen and having regard the various orders passed by this Court, we are of   the   considered   view   that   this   is   a   fit   case   to   invoke   our jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and give a quietus to the dispute.  3. In   the   peculiar   facts   and   circumstances   of   this   case,   we direct the appellant – Punjab National Bank to appoint 29 canteen workers forthwith on the following conditions:­ (i)  They shall be paid half wages of the Class­IV employees or   prevailing   minimum   wages   in   the   State,   whichever   is Signature Not Verified higher; Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND Date: 2018.09.26 15:31:23 IST Reason: (ii) All other benefits which have been granted to the 23 canteen workers already appointed will also be extended to the 29 workers covered by this order. ­2­ (iii) There shall be no other or further claim on this count from the workmen. (iv)   The   benefits,   as   above,   shall   be   extended   to   the   29 workmen from the first date of appointment of the 23 workmen. 4. In that view of the matter, we set aside the impugned Judgment of the High Court. 5. We make it clear that no settlement as prevailing in the Bank shall   stand   in   the   way   of   Bank   giving   effect   to   the   order   as indicated above. 6. The appeal is disposed of in the afore­stated terms. ......................J (KURIAN JOSEPH) .....................J               (SANJAY KISHAN KAUL) NEW DELHI;  25TH SEPTEMBER, 2018.