SUBHASH DESAI vs. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNOR OF MAHARASHTRA

Case Type: Writ Petition Civil

Date of Judgment: 23-08-2022

Preview image for SUBHASH DESAI vs. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNOR OF MAHARASHTRA

Full Judgment Text

1 N THE UPREME OURT OF NDIA I    S  C    I O RIGINAL  C IVIL  J URISDICTION   W RIT  P ETITION  (C IVIL ) N O . 493/2022    ETITIONER S SUBHASH DESAI       …P ( VERSUS  PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,  GOVERNOR OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.            …R ESPONDENT ( S ) With W.P.(C) No.469/2022 W.P.(C) No.468/2022 W.P.(C) No.470/2022 W.P.(C) No.479/2022 W.P.(C) No.538/2022 ORDER 1. We have heard learned senior counsels appearing on both sides and perusing the material available on record.  2. This Court is of opinion that the present batch of petitions raise important constitutional questions relating to interpretation of Schedule X of the Constitution pertaining to disqualification, as well as the powers of the Speaker and the Governor and the power of judicial review thereof.  3. At the outset, it may be necessary to highlight one particular Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND Date: 2022.08.23 20:33:44 IST Reason: question raised in these batch of matters relating to the power of the   Speaker/Deputy   Speaker   to   initiate   disqualification 2 proceedings, when proceedings for removal from the said office has been initiated against them. In  Nabam Rebia & Bamang Felix v. Deputy   Speaker,   Arunachal   Pradesh   Legislative   Assembly , (2016) 8 SCC 1, a Constitution   bench of this Court held as follows: “ 193 ….We   are,   therefore,   of   the   view   that constitutional   purpose   and   constitutional   harmony would   be   maintained   and   preserved,   if   a   Speaker refrains   from   adjudication   of   a   petition   for disqualification under the Tenth Schedule, whilst his own position, as the Speaker, is under challenge. This would also, allow the two provisions [Article 179(c) and the   Tenth   Schedule]   to   operate   in   their   individual constitutional   space,   without   encroaching   on   the other.”   4. We may   prima facie   observe that the proposition of law laid down by the Constitution bench in    ( ), stands Nebam Rebia supra on contradictory reasoning, which requires gap filling to uphold the constitutional morality. As such, this question needs a reference to a Constitution bench for the requisite gap filling exercise to be conducted.    5. Further, these matters merit reference under Article 145(3) of the Constitution to a 5­Judge bench as they raise other substantial questions of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution, which are: a. Whether notice for removal of a Speaker restricts him from continuing with disqualification proceedings under 3 Tenth   Schedule   of   the   Constitution,   as   held   by   this Court in    ( supra )? Nebam Rebia b. Whether a petition under Article 226 or Article 32 lies, inviting a decision on a disqualification petition by the High Courts or the Supreme Court, as the case may be? c. Can   a   Court   hold   that   a   member   is   “deemed”   to   be disqualified,   by   virtue   of   his/her   actions,   absent   a decision by the Speaker? d. What is the status of proceedings in the House during the   pendency   of   disqualification   petitions   against   the members?  e.  If the decision of a Speaker that a member has incurred disqualification under the Tenth Schedule relates back to the date of the action complained of, then what is the status   of   proceedings   that   took   place   during   the pendency of a disqualification petition? f. What is the impact of the removal of Paragraph 3 of the Tenth Schedule?  g. What   is   the   scope   of   the   power   of   the   Speaker   to determine   the   Whip   and   the   leader   of   the   house legislature party? What is the interplay of the same with respect to the provisions of the Tenth Schedule? 4 h. Are intra­party decisions amenable to judicial review? What is the scope of the same? i. What   is   the   extent   of   discretion   and   power   of   the Governor to invite a person to form the Government, and whether the same is amenable to judicial review?  j. What   is   the   scope   of   the   powers   of   the   Election Commission of India with respect to determination of a split within a party? 6. The papers may be placed before the Hon’ble the Chief Justice for appropriate orders, immediately.  ...........................CJI. (N.V. RAMANA)         ...........................J. (KRISHNA MURARI) ...........................J. (HIMA KOHLI) NEW DELHI; AUGUST 23, 2022.