MUNISH KUMAR vs. THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

Case Type: Civil Appeal

Date of Judgment: 19-05-2020

Preview image for MUNISH KUMAR vs. THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

Full Judgment Text

CA 2426/2020 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 2426 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No 3502 of 2019) Munish Kumar …Appellant(s) Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Another …Respondent(s) O R D E R 1 Leave granted. 2 The present appeal relates to a claim for compassionate appointment. 3 The father of the appellant was an employee of the first respondent. He died while in service on 16 June 2004. Though he had applied for retirement on medical grounds prior to the date of death, it is not in dispute that the application was approved only on 17 June 2004, after the employee had died (the application was approved with Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by effect from 8 April 2003). The application for compassionate appointment has been CHETAN KUMAR Date: 2020.05.21 15:55:24 IST Reason: CA 2426/2020 2 rejected on the ground that under the policy on compassionate appointment dated 18 January 1990, in the case of a government servant (falling in Class III and IV), who retires on medical grounds under Rule 38 of the CCS (Pension) Rules 1972, there is an age limit of 53 years and 55 years respectively which the employee had crossed. 4 We find merit in the contention of the appellant that the above clause of the policy would have no application in the present case. On the date of death, the application for retirement on medical grounds had not been approved. The approval, which was issued after the death of the employee, would therefore not have any valid basis. There could not have been any retrospective cessation of service by the acceptance of the application of retirement on medical grounds after the date of death of the employee. The case would be covered by clause 2(a) of the policy which deals with a government servant, who dies while in service leaving the family in immediate need of assistance. We are, therefore, of the view that the application of the appellant ought not to have been rejected on the ground which has weighed with the authorities. 5 The application of the appellant shall be reconsidered in the light of the above observations and a final decision shall be communicated to the appellant within a period of three months from today. In the event that no decision is arrived at, we grant liberty to the learned counsel for the appellant to apply for appropriate directions in the present appeal. In the event that compassionate appointment is granted to the appellant, no arrears of salary would be payable and he would be entitled to salary with effect from the date of joining service. CA 2426/2020 3 6 A copy of the decision shall be forwarded by the State Government of Himachal Pradesh to the Standing Counsel, who shall cause a copy thereof to be placed on the record of these proceedings. 7 The appeal is allowed in the above terms. 8 Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. …………...…...….......………………........J. [Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud] …..…..…....…........……………….…........J. [Hemant Gupta] …..…..…....…........……………….…........J. [Ajay Rastogi] New Delhi; May 19, 2020 CA 2426/2020 4 ITEM NO.1 Virtual Court 3 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.3502/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-10-2015 in CWP No. 142/2013 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla) MUNISH KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s) Date : 19-05-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, Add. AG Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed reportable order. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (Chetan Kumar) (Saroj Kumari Gaur) A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master (Signed reportable order is placed on the file)