Satypal Arya vs M/o Health And Family Welfare
- Court
- Central Administrative Tribunal
1
OA No. 53/2022
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
OA No. 53/2022
Reserved on : 28.09.2026
Pronounced on : 30.10.2026
Hon’ble Ms. Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J)
Hon’ble Dr. Sumeet Jerath, Member (A)
1. Satypal Arya
S/o Sh. Satyvir Arya,
aged about 48 years
R/o H.No.17, Sector 23, Sonepat, Haryana,
Working as a Technical Officer in Neuro Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi
2. Hitender Kumar Sharma
S/o Late Sh. R.P. Sharma,
Aged about 46 years
R/o C-4/2 Arjun Mohalla, Maungpur Delhi 110053
Working as a Technical Officer in
Radiodiagnosis, AIIMS, New Delhi.
3. Subhash Ratti, S/o Satpal Ratti,
Aged about 45 years
R/o C-90, Neelambar Aptts,
Captain Satish Marg, Delhi 110034.
Working as a Technical Officer, Department of Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi
4. Taru gupta, D/o Dinesh kumar Aggarwal
R/o 8/225, Sector 3, Rajendra nagar, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad-
201005, U.P
Working as a Technical Officer, Department of Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi.
5. Ram cahndra Yadav, S/o Sh. R.D. yadav
Aged About 50 years
Resident of B-92 Ayurvigyan Nagar,
New Delhi-110049,
Working as a Technical Officer, Department of
Radiology, AIIMS, New Delhi.
6. Prakash Mohan S/o Sh. Ram Saran,
aged about 41 years,
R/o H-75/19 Gali No.13, Jai Prakash
Nagar, Ghonda, Delhi-110053
Working as a Technical Officer, Radiology
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
2
OA No. 53/2022
Department, AIIMS, New Delhi
7. KULDEEP Singh S/o RAJPAL
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/o H 114 Rajendra Park Extension,
Nangloi, Delhi 110041
Working as a Technical Officer, Department of Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi.
8. Pushpender S/o N.K. Tomar,
Aged 42 years,
R/o A 806, Ahinsha vatika
Ramnagar, Shahdra, Delhi 110032
Working as a Technical Officer, Department of
Radiology, AIIMS, New Delhi.
9. MD.MUSTAFA S/O MOHD TAKI
Aged About 41 years
R/o V&P.O BASOUD, DISTT-BAGHPAT, U.P
Working as a Radiology technician in Radiology Deptt,
AIIMS, New Delhi
10. Chhote Lal
S/o sh. Mohan Ram,
Aged about 45 years,
R/o Flat No.416, DDA, MIG, Metro Apartment,
Jahangirpuri, Delhi 110033.
Working as a Radiology technician in Radiology Deptt,
AIIMS, New Delhi
11. RAMHET MEENA
S/o Jodha Ram Meena
Aged About 36 years
R/o FLAT NO. 409, Northend Tower,
Chhatarpur 110074,
Working as a Radiology technician in Radiology Department,
AIIMS, New Delhi
12. SHIKHA JUYAL W/o Mr. Narendra Juyal
Aged About 36 years
138, DIN Apartment, Plot no.7, Sec 4, Dwarka, NewDelhi 110075
Working as a radiology technician in
Radiology Department, AIIMS, New Delhi
13. Sandip Kumar Dhasmana
S/O Sh. Dinesh Chander Dhasmana
Aged about 40 years
R/o H-120, Gali No.9, Rajnagar 2, Pialam,
Colony, New Delhi-110077.
Working as a Radiology technician in Radiology Department,
AIIMS, New Delhi
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
3
OA No. 53/2022
14. UDIT KUMAR S/o Babu Lal
Aged About 33 years
R/o B-98, Old B Type, A.V. Nagar, New Delhi-110049
Working as a Radiology technician in Radiology Department,
AIIMS, New Delhi
15. Bhanu Pratap
S/o Late Sh. Mahipal Singh Nayak,
Aged about 35 years,
R/o 2591, Pocket-2, Sec-C, Janta Flats,
Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070.
Working as a Radiology technician in Radiology Department,
AIIMS, New Delhi
16. VANDANA, W/o Rajan singh
R/o H.no.411, Shakti Khand -4,
Indrapuram, Ghaziabad, U.P
Working as a Radiology technician in
Radiology Department, AIIMS, New Delhi.
17. MANISHA CHAUHAN W/o Jatin bansiwal
R/o 24-C, POCKET, A-14, HIMGIRI
Apartments, Kalkaji Extension,
New Delhi 110019
Working as a Radiology technician in
Radiology Department, AIIMS, New Delhi
18. Aditya Thakur S/o Sh. Madan Mohan,
Aged about 30 years,
R/o 121, 2nd floor, New Delhi,
Working as a Radiology technician in Radiology Department,
AIIMS, New Delhi
19. Pankaj Kumar, S/o Arun Prasad,
Aged about 38 years,
R/o 35, Mohammadpur,
Near Bhikaji Cama Place,
New Delhi-110066.
Working as a Radiology technician in Radiology Department,
AIIMS, New Delhi
20. TARUN PHANAN S/o B.I. Phanan
R/o Plot no.105, 2ND Floor, inside
Building, in front of axis bank ATM, SULTANPUR
Colony, New DELHI-110030
Working as a Radiology technician in Radiology
Department, AIIMS, New Delhi
21. Kuber Dutt Gaur, S/o J.P. Sharma,
Aged about 35 years,
R/o RZ-F 757/7, Raj Nagar-II,
Palam Colony, New Delhi-110077.
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
4
OA No. 53/2022
Working as a Radiology technician in Radiology Deptt, AIIMS,
New Delhi
22. Dharmendra, S/o R.K.P. Singh
aged about 41 years R/o Rz 153/3, street no.7,
Durga Park, New Delhi-10045
Working as a Radiology technician in Radiology Department,
AIIMS, New Delhi.
23. Kamal Kant, S/o Sh. Raja Ram,
Aged about 50 years
R/o P-126/A-2, Shankar Nagar Extn.,
Malu road Delhi 51
Working as a Technical Officer in N.M.R.
Department, AIIMS, New Delhi.
24. Meenakshi Aggarwal
W/o Rajeev Aggarwal
Aged about 50 years,
R/o C-1/124,R.S.G.F, Savitri Nagar,
New Delhi-110017
Working as a Technical Officer in N.M.R, AIIMS, New Delhi
25. Krishan Kumar Sharma
S/o Shri Tejveer Sharma
Aged about 49 years,
R/o A-162, Shastri Nagar, Delhi 110052
Working as a Technical Officer in N.M.R Department,
26. Harish Singh
S/o Pooran Singh,
Aged about 47 years,
R/o RZ G1/19,Meha Apartt.
Mahavir Enclave, Palam, Delhi.
Working as a Technical Officer in N.M.R, AIIMS, New Delhi
27. Rajeev Thakkar
S/o Late Sh. I.J. Thakkar
Aged about 46 years,
R/o 5/312, Vasundhara Sec 5,
Ghaziabad-201012
Working as a Technical Officer in N.M.R, AIIMS, New Delhi
28. Rekha Hasija, W/o Sh. Anil Hasija,
Aged about 43 years,
R/o 841/9, Faridabad, Haryana-121006.
Working as a Technical Officer in N.M.R
Department, AIIMS, New Delhi
29. Manoj Kumar
S/o Late Sh. Mahavir Prasad,
Aged about 44 years,
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
5
OA No. 53/2022
R/o E-58, Dindar Pur Extn, New Delhi-43
Working as a Technical Officer in N.M.R Department,
AIIMS, New Delhi
30. Shashank Shekhar Sharma
S/o Late sh. S.C. Sharma
Aged about 39 years
R/o 12, Dayanand Block,
Shakarpur, Delhi 110092
Working as a Radiology technician in N.M.R Department,
AIIMS, New Delhi
31. Rajdeep Ranjan, S/o Vinod Kumar,
Aged about 40 years,
R/o A-1/48, CHHATARPUR, Delhi
Working as a Technician Radiology in N.M.R Department,
AIIMS, New Delhi
32. Manjesh Pandey
S/o Ram Bachan Pandey,
Aged about 39 years,
R/o E1-A, DDA Flats, Munirka, New Delhi-110068
Working as a Technician Radiology in N.M.R Department,
AIIMS, New Delhi
33. Taruna Agrawa, W/o Amit Kumar,
Aged about 36 years,
R/o H.No.20, Extension-2-C,
Nangloi, Delhi-110041
Working as a Radiology Technician, Department N.M.R,
AIIMS, New Delhi
34. Bhoop Singh, S/o Ram Swaroop
Aged about 34 years,
R/o S-2, Plot-100, Khasra No.69,
Chhatarpur Pahari, Gali No.2, Delhi.
Working as a Radiology Technician in N.M.R Department,
35. Ranjeet Kumar
S/o Shyam Sundar Singh,
Aged about 37years,
R/o H.No. A-33, Sutanpur Colony,
Mehrauli, New Delhi, 110030
Working as a Radiology Technician in N.M.R Department,
36. Hemant Rose, S/o Sh. Ranbir singh Rose,
aged about 33 years,
R/o H.No.148/612 V&P.O. Ujawa, New Delhi 110073,
WORKING as a Radiology Technician at N.C.I posted by AIIMS,
New Delhi.
37. MUKESH KUMAR MEENA
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
6
OA No. 53/2022
S/o Ram kunwar Meena
Aged About 36 years
R/o New colony, Garhi harsaru, near hayatpur road
Gurgaon, Haryana
Working as a Radiology Technician at N.C.I, Badsa posted by
AIIMS New Delhi.
38. Parvinder Chhillar
S/O Sh. Rakesh Chhillar
aged about 33 years,
R/o V& P.O. Nizam Pur Delhi 110081,
Working as a Radiology Technician at N.C.I posted by AIIMS
New Delhi.
39. AMIT KUMAR, S/o Charan Dass
R/o H.No. 4/2737, Street No. 4,
Bihari Colony, Shahdra, Delhi -110032
Working as a Radiology Technician at Forensic science &
Toxicology AIIMS New Delhi
40. SATVEER SINGH
S/o Bhadrapal Singh,
Aged about 35 years
R/o 13/598 Mandoli extn., Delhi 110093
Working as a Radiology Technician at CDER AIIMS, New Delhi
41. KAUSHAL KUMAR BHARTI, S/o Shriram
Aged about 41 years
R/o C-84/24, Arjun Gali no.7,
Mohanpuri, Moujpur, Delhi-110053
Working as Radiology Technician
at CDER AIIMS New Delhi.
42. Mahesh Kumar Jain
S/o Late Sh. S.C.Jain,
aged about 48 years,
R/o WZ-796, Near Shiv Mandir ,
Badiyal Mohalla, Palam Village, N.Delhi-45
Working as a Technical Officer in Neuro Radiology, AIIMS,
43. Parvesh Kumar
S/o B.S. Verma
Aged about 52 years,
R/o G-543, Anand Vas, Shukur Pur, Delhi 110034.
Working as a Technical Officer, Neuro Radiology, AIIMS
44. Sachin Verma
S/o Late K.A.S.Verma
Aged about 49 years,
R/o 48, Bhagwan Park Colony,
Jharoda Village, Burari, Delhi-110084.
Working as a Technical Officer in Neuro-Radiology, AIIMS,
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
7
OA No. 53/2022
New Delhi
45. Bhuvnesh Chander Pasricha
S/o Sh. Udey Pasricha,
Aged about 46 years,
R/o 195, Seemant Vihar,Sec 14, Kaushambi,
Ghaziabad, U.P-201010.
Working as a Technical Officer in Neuro Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi
46. Ashwani Garg
S/o Sh.S.R. Garg,
aged about 42years,
R/o 13-A,Bhim Enclave, Vikas Nagar,New
Delhi 110059.
Working as a Technical Officer in Neuro Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi
47. Manoj Kunwar
S/o Sh.Kedar Singh,
Aged about 38 years,
R/o 61-A, Ground Floor, Pocket-10b,
Jasola, New Delhi 110025.
Working as a Technical Officer
in Neuro Radiology, AIIMS, New Delhi
48. Siddhartha Priya S/o Sh.G.S.Gopala
Aged about 46 years,
R/o HI-16,F.F.,Anand Vihar,Hari Nagar,
Jail Road,New Delhi-110064.
Working as a Technical Officer in Neuro Radiology, AIIMS,
49. BHARTI
D/o Dharmender
Aged about 39 years
R/o 503, Udai Giri Apartment,
Kaushambi Ghaziabad (UP)
Working as a Technical Officer in Neuro Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi
50. AFZAL S/o Ida Khan
Aged about 45 years
R/o H 874 Shakur Pur Anand Vas, Delhi
Working as a Technical Officer in Neuro Radiology, AIIMS,
51. Meena Devrani W/o Vikrant Devrani,
Aged about 38 years,
R/o 01, Sahara Apartment, Plot No.11
Sec -6, Dwarka, Delhi.
Working as a Radiographer in Neuro Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
8
OA No. 53/2022
52. LALIT DAGAR, S/o Sh.Om prakash
Aged about 46 years
R/o V.P.O UJAWA New Delhi 110073
Working as a Radiology technician in Neuro Radiology,
53. TEJPAL RATHI
S/o Late Sh. Mohinder Singh
Aged about 37 years
R/o RZ J 158, Old Roshan Pura
Najafgarh New Delhi-110043
Working as a Radiology technician in Neuro Radiology,
54. Shitha.S W/o Biju.A,
Aged about 41 years,
R/o 260/1, S.S.Lane, Meerut Cantt.
Working as a Radiology technician in Neuro Radiology,
55. Subhash
S/o Late Sh. Kedar Singh
Aged about 42 years,
R/o B-312, A.V.Nagar, AIIMS, Residential Campus,
New Delhi-110049.
Working as a Technician Radiology in Neuro Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi
56. Hema D/o Sh. Ishwar Lal
Aged about 31 years,
R/o Village-Kuthru, P.O-Kiyao
15/20,Tehsil Rampur BSR,
Distt. Shimla, H.P.
Working as a Radiology technician, in Neuro Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi.
57. Devender Singh
S/o Sh.Ram Bharose Lal,
Aged about 33 years,
R/o.H.No.402, H-3 Block,
Street No.9, Kunwar Singh Nagar,
Working as a Radiology technician in Neuro Radiology, AIIMS,
New Delhi
58. ANITA UPADHYAY D/o C.M. pandey
R/o 272 POCKET B New MIG Flats,
Mayur Vihar phase 3, New Delhi
Working as a Radiology technician, in Radiology IRCH,
59. Vikram S/o Late Sh. Om Prakash,
Aged about 40 years,
R/o 165, Nehru Market, Badarpur, New Delhi 110044.
Working as Technician Radiology in Trauma Center,
60. NITIN SHARMA S/o Sh.Ashok Sharma
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
9
OA No. 53/2022
Aged About 37 years
R/o F-142/2 Ganga vihar Delhi-110094
Working as Technician Radiology in Trauma Center,
61. HARMINDER SINGH
S/o Sh. Hari Singh Aged about 42 years
R/o pkt G/9 H.No. 43, Sector 15 Rohini, New Delhi
Working as Technician Radiology Trauma Center,
62. HITESH S/o Ramphal Rana
aged about 34 years
R/o 153 Mungeshar Delhi 110039
Working as Technician Radiology in Trauma Center,
63. Manish Kumar S/o Sh. Mahesh Chand,
Aged about 34 years,
R/o FK-48, Near Shiv Mandir, Shastri Nagar, Delhi
Working as a Radiology Technician in Trauma Center,
64. PETER KEKRETTA
S/o Late Francis Kekretta,
Aged about 34 years,
R/o B 105/F-1, DILAHAD COLONY, DELHI 10095
Working as a Radiology Technician in Trauma Center,
AIIMS, New Delhi
65. Arvind Kumar S/o Sh. Narayan Singh,
Aged About 33 years,
R/o Vill. Garodiya ki Dhani, Post D.K.Bas
via Pilani Distt, Jhujhunu, Rajasthan
Working as a Radiology Technician at Trauma center, AIIMS.
66. UPENDER S/o Ram Bhai
Aged About 35 years,
R/o RZ-195/O Street No.16,
Tughlakabad Extn. New Delhi 110019,
Working as a Radiology Technician in Trauma Center
67. NITIN GAUTAM S/o Sh. Magan Das,
Aged About 33 years,
R/o B-113, Street No.9, New Usmanpur, Delhi
Working as a Radiology Technician in Trauma Center,
68. MADHU D/o Sh. Om Prakash Gupta,
Aged About 32 years,
R/o B-113, Street No.9, New Usmanpur, Delhi,
Working as a Radiology Technician in Trauma Center,
AIIMS, New Delhi
69. Pushpa Bhagat W/o Sh. PANKAJ,
Aged About 31 years,
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
10
OA No. 53/2022
R/O G-816, Phase-VI, Aya Nagar Extn
New Delhi-110047.
Working as a Radiology Technician in Trauma Center,
AIIMS, New Delhi
70. SHAZIA QUMAR S/o Qumaruddin
Aged About 34 years,
R/o H.No.147, street number 10, Zakir Nagar,
New Delhi 110025,
Working as a Radiology Technician in Trauma Center,
AIIMS, New Delhi
71. Nelketoulie Kuotsu
S/o Kipfelie Kuotsu,
Aged About 33 years,
R/o H.No.204, 3rd Floor, Arjun Nagar,
Safdarjung Enclave, New delhi-110029,
Working as a Radiology Technician in Trauma Center,
AIIMS, New Delhi
72. RAJESH KUMAR RANJAN
S/o Sh. Jagdeo yadav,
Aged About 46 years,
R/o E-26, Mansa Ram Park
Uttam Nagar New Delhi-110059,
Working as a Radiology Technician in Trauma Center,
AIIMS, New Delhi
73. SONIA SHARMA W/o Mayank Garg,
Aged About 31 years,
R/o P 4 First floor Block P Pandav Nagar,
Mayur Vihar Phase-1, New Delhi
Working as a Radiology Technician in
Trauma Center, AIIMS, New Delhi
74. Devraj Singh S/o Late Sh. Mohan Singh,
Aged about 34 years,
R/o 271, Arjun Nagar,
Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029.
Working as a Technician Radiology in
Trauma center, AIIMS, New Delhi.
75. Sanjay Kumar S/o Sh. Jagdish Das,
Aged About 33 years,
R/o E-47 Vishwas Park Uttam Nagar,
New Delhi 110059
Working as a Radiology Technician in
Trauma Center, AIIMS, New Delhi
76. T.T. Hraisia S/o T.T. Vakhu
Aged About 31 years
R/o 1736/2 FF-14 Sher singh Bazaar, Kotla Mubarak,
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
11
OA No. 53/2022
New Delhi-110003
Working as a Radiology Technician in
Trauma Center, AIIMS, New Delhi.
77. Manvendra Singh S/o Chandresh kumar singh
Aged about 34 years
R/o H.No. 107, H-Block, Street No. 14,
Jai Prakash Nagar, Delhi-110053
Working as a Radiology Technician in Cardic Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi
78. Sandeep Kumar
S/o Sh. LEKHRAM DHIMAN
Aged about 35 years,
R/o FLAT NO. JB 16F Hari Enclave,
Hari nagar, new delhi-110064,
Working as a Radiology technician in IRCH, AIIMS
79. Atindra Nath Ghosh
S/o Late Sh. R.N. Ghosh,
Aged about 33 years,
R/o DDA Flats-67, Ground Floor,
Shivaji Enclave, New Delhi
Working as a Radiology technician in IRCH, AIIMS,
80. Ram Narayan Meena
S/o Sh. Shiv Dayal Meena,
Aged about 35 years,
R/o RZ-224, Ground Floor,
Nand Vihar, Near Dwarka Metro Station, Delhi
Working as a Radiology Technician in IRCH, AIIMS
81. Anshul Chauhan, Aged about 29 years,
D/o Aditya Kumar,
R/o C-294A, 2nd Floor, Street No. 6,
Mandir Marg, Chhajupur, Shahdara, Delhi 110032
Working as Technician (Radiology)
82 Kundan Kumar,
Aged about 34 years,
S/o Sh. Rajendra Prasad
R/o KCG Complex, tower D
F.NO. 5, Mehrauli, New Delhi 110030
Working as Tech. (Radiology)
83 Brijesh Kumar Chauhan,
Aged about 46 years,
S/o Kadam Singh,
R/o Flat No. 151,SF, KD Block,
Near Kohat Metro Station, Pitampura New Delhi 110035
Working as Technical Officer in Cardiac Radiology
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
12
OA No. 53/2022
84. Runisha Bomrah, aged about 31 year,
D/o Rattanpol Singh,
R/O House No. 28 Arjun Nagar, Delhi,
Working as Technician Radiology in Trauma Center,
AIIMS, New Delhi
85. Anil Verma S/o Late Sh. S.S. Verma,
Aged about 50 years,
R/o WZ 283/148A, Vishnu Garden,
New Delhi 110018
Working as Technical Officer in Cardiac Radiology
86. Swapna Rani Jena, Aged about 41 years
D/o Ramesh Chandra Jena,
R/o Plot No. 11A, Krishna Enclave,
Nafafgarh, Delhi 110072
Working as Technician Radiology in Trauma Centre, AIIMS
87. Santosh Kumar S/o Surya Naryan Chaudhary
Aged about 41 years
R/o 78, FF, DDa Flats, Arbindo Apartments,
Adhchini, New Delhi 110017
Working as Technician Radiology in AIIMS, New Delhi
88. Gauri Aswal Rawat,
Aged about 30 years,
D/o Sh. Pradeep Aswal,
R/o A-33/554, Sultanpuri Delhi 110030
Working as a Technician Radiology in AIIMS, New Delhi
89. Sriram R. aged about 24 years,
S/o Ramachandran K.
R/o 229A, FF, Humayunpur,
Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029
Working as a Technician Radiology in Trauma Centre,
90. Amarjeet Kumar S/o Sh. Rajesh Kumar
Aged about 26 years,
R/o 13A Gali No. 2, Vikrant Vihar,
Mohan Garden, New Delhi 110059
Working as a Technician Radiology in Trauma Centre,
91. Arun Yuvarajan S, aged about 25 years,
S/o Sh. Sampath,
R/o 229A, FF, Humayunpur, Safdarjung Enclave,
New Delhi 110029,
Working as a Technician Radiology in Trauma Centre,
92. John Salamon C aged about 23 years,
S/o Chelladurai,
R/o 9A, SF, Humayunpur,
Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029,
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
13
OA No. 53/2022
Working as a Technician Radiology in Trauma Centre,
93. Anil Kumar Sharma
Aged about 58 year,
S/o Sh. Jagmal Singh,
R/o M-21, Gali No. 13, Bharampuri, New Delhi 110053,
Working as a Chief Technical officer in Main Radiology,
94. Bhanu Pratap Singh,
Aged about 51 years,
S/o Shivraj Singh,
R/o Flat No. 109, Northend Tower, 60 foota Road,
Chattarpur, Delhi
Working as a Chief Technical officer in Main Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi.
95. Arun Kumar,
aged about 51 year,
S/o Sh. Govinf kelkatta,
R/o Flat No. 209 North end Tower, 60 foota Road,
Chattarpur Delhi
Working as a Chief Technical officer in Main Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi.
96. Poonam Mukhi, Aged about 54 year,
W/o Sh. Sandeep Mukhi,
Road 43, khasra No. 8, west pungabibal,
New Delhi 110026
Working as a Chief Technical officer in Main Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi.
97. Surendra Singh,
aged about 59 year,
S/o late Sh. Moanchand Singh,
R/o 504, Type -III, A.V. Nagar, New Delhi
Working as a Chief Technical officer in Main Radiology,
98. Ashwani Kumar
aged about 59 year,
S/o Sh. Kedar Nath,
House No. 53 Vivekanandpuri, New Delhi
Working as a Chief Technical officer in Main Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi.
99. Bhushan Sharma,
Aged about 59 year,
S/o Sh. H.P. Sharma,
R/o 1004, Lohia gali No. 4,
Beharpur, New Delhi 110053
Working as a Chief Technical officer in Main Radiology,
AIIMS, New Delhi.
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
14
OA No. 53/2022
100. Pawan Kumar Popli, Aged about 56 year,
R/o H.No. 669, Bhai Parmanand Colony,
New Delhi 110009
Working as a Chief Technical officer in Main Radiology,
101. Deepak Kumar
S/o Late Sh. Azad Singh,
Aged about 34 years,
R/o 363-B, V&P.O Jonti, Delhi-110081
Working as a Technician Radiology in IRCH, AIIMS,
All Applicants are Group-“B” employees
.…Applicants
(By Advocate : Mr. Amit Anand)
VERSUS
1. Union of India Through
The Secretary,
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare
Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110011.
2. The Secretary,
Department of Expenditure
Ministry of Finance, North Block
New Delhi-110011
3. The Secretary, DoPT,
North Block, New Delhi-110011
4. Director,
All Indian Institute of Medical Sciences, (AIIMS),
Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110029
.... RESPONDENTS
(By Advocate : Mr. Gyanendra Singh)
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
15
OA No. 53/2022
ORDER
Hon’ble Dr. Sumeet Jerath, Member (A)
The instant OA has been filed by the applicant under
Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the
following relief:
(i) to quash and set aside the impugned memorandum dated
12.05.2021 ( Annexure-A-1);
(ii) to direct the respondents to grant 4,600/- grade pay to
Radiographer (Radiology technician Grade-2) as per 6th CPC (w.e.f.
01.01.2006) recommendation and subsequent pay scales to
promotional posts in the radiology cadre i.e. Radiology Technician
Grade-II may be grant 4,600/-, Radiology Technician Grade-I may
be grant 4,800/-, Technical officer (Radiology) may be grant 5,400/-
PB-3, Senior Technical officer (Radiology) may be grant 6,600/-, and
Chief Technical officer (Radiology) may be grant 7,600/-
(iii) to remove the anomaly with regard to the facts that promotional
post and feeder post both lie in the same grade Viz Technical officer
(Radiology), Senior Technical officer (Radiology) and Radiology
Technician Grade -II, Radiology Technician Grade-I;
(iv) to direct the respondents to grant Radiology Technician after
merging of Radiology Technician Grade 2 and Grade-1 grade pay of
Rs. 4,800/- from date of merging i.e. 26.09.2016;
(v) May also pass any further order(s), direction(s) as be deemed just
and proper to meet the ends of justice.
2. The factual matrix of the case as per the counsel of the
applicant is that this is the second round of litigation and the
Tribunal in the first round of litigation in OA No.421/2021 in
the matter of Satyapal Arya & Ors. Vs. UOI had passed orders
directing the respondents to thoroughly examine the far-
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
16
OA No. 53/2022
reaching claims regarding the pay structure across 5 stages in
the Radiology Department and pass a reasoned order on the
representation of the applicants dated 21.01.2016 within a
period of 3 months. In compliance with the said directions, the
respondents passed the impugned order dated 12.05.2021,
showing complete highhandedness by refusing to resolve the
justified pay anomalies of the Radiology cadre despite the
Institute itself agreeing that anomalies exist. This arbitrary
approach contradicts the stance taken in the case of PGIMER
Chandigarh (upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (C)
No.30058/2014), where similar technical cadres
(Laboratory/X-ray/Radiotherapy) were restructured w.e.f.
01.03.1992 based on the Prabhakar Committee
recommendations, granting appropriate pay scales and higher
Grade Pay up to Rs. 7600/- across hierarchical levels. The
applicants submitted that the 6th CPC granted a Grade Pay of
Rs. 4600/- to Radiographers (designated as Radiology
Technician Grade 2 in AIIMS), which was accepted by the
Union of India, but the respondents wrongly granted them a
lower Grade Pay of Rs. 4200/-. Furthermore, the promotional
post of Radiology Technician Grade 1, achieved after 8 years of
service, was also placed in the same Grade Pay of Rs. 4200/-,
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
17
OA No. 53/2022
violating the principle that lower and promotional posts
cannot be in the same grade pay. Subsequently, the
respondents merged Radiology Technician Grade I and Grade
II into a single cadre and granted a Grade Pay of Rs. 4200/-,
which is illegal and wrong due to two primary reasons: (i)
Grade 2 should have received Rs. 4600/- and the promotional
Grade 1 should have received Rs. 4800/- (or higher), whereas
the merged post was assigned an even lower Grade Pay of Rs.
4200/-, thereby decimating promotional avenues; and (ii) as
per DoPT OMs, when two grades are merged, incumbents
must be given the pay scale of the higher post (which in this
case should have been Rs. 4800/- for the merged Radiology
Technician cadre), but they have only been granted Rs. 4200/-
till date. Aggrieved by this illegal denial, the applicants have
filed the instant Original Application.
3. The counsel of the applicant argued as under on the
following grounds:
A. Because the respondents themselves have stated that the
applicants are entitled to higher pay.
B. Because even as per the $6^{th}$ CPC, the entry grade of
Radiographers (Radiology technician Grade-II in AIIMS), the
applicants are having requisite qualification i.e. B.Sc Radiography.
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
18
OA No. 53/2022
C. Because $7^{th}$ CPC report approved by cabinet also clarifies
C.T.O Radiology 7600 and Jr. T.O (Radiology technician in AIIMS)
4800/-.
D. Because having promotional post of Radiographer Grade-I in the
same grade pay of 4200/-, as Radiographer Grade-II having Grade
Pay of 4200 from which, promotions are made is arbitrary and
cannot be sustained in law.
E. Because again in the cadre, Technical Officer and Senior
Technical Officer have been given identical grade pay 4600 whereas
latter is promotional post of former.
F. Because the action of the respondents is arbitrary and violative of
Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
G. Because the case of the applicants is squarely covered by the
various judgment on this fact.
H. Because even after various representation and 3 Committee, the
legitimate grievance of the applicants have not been resolved.
I. Because the anomaly has been existing from 1.1.2006 and the
respondents are even aware of the same which evident from the fact
that various committees has been constituted to resolve the issue
but actually redressal has not taken place till date.
4. To buttress his arguments, handed across the bar a copy of
the Hon'ble Apex Court judgment in WP(C) 10645/2016 –
Amar Chand & others vs Union of India and others ; and
WP(C) 10649/2016 – Sabu Thomas and others vs Union of
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
19
OA No. 53/2022
India and another dated 24.02.2020, which inter alia states
as follows:
14. In defending the said decision to revert the pay scale of the
applicants from Rs.5,000-8,000/- to Rs.4,500-7000/-, it was
contended by the Respondents that in terms of the qualification for
the post of Radiographer, the pay scale of Rs.5,000-8,000/- could
only be extended to those posts for which the minimum qualification
was the three year diploma in Radiological Technology. The Health
Department had moved a proposal on 18th April, 2002 for the
removal of the anomaly pointed out in O.A. No.1219/1999, after
‟
which the Department of Personnel and Training („DoPT ) took a
decision to remove the anomaly by placing Senior Radiographers in
the pay scale of Rs.4300-7000/-and Junior Radiographers in the
pay scale of Rs.4,000-6,000/-. Thus, the pay scale of Rs.5,000-
8,000/- of Senior Radiographers stood withdrawn with effect from
1st January, 1996.
15. The CAT, in the aforementioned order dated 13th April, 2004
found that the withdrawal of the pay scale of Rs.5,000-8,000/-
retrospectively from 1st January, 1996 was without issuing any
Show Cause Notice to the applicants, and was therefore violative of
the principles of natural justice. It was further observed that:
"24. Another aspect which has to looked into is invidious
discrimination. The hostility in action is apparent as the
counter parts in various other Ministries and departments
despite having identical qualifications have been placed in the
higher pay scale of Rs.5000-8000 a similar treatment has
been denied to applicants which would amount to creating a
class within the class which does not pass the test of
reasonableness and violates principles of equality."
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
20
OA No. 53/2022
5. Per contra, the counsel for the respondents vehemently
opposed the arguments of the applicants and argued
vociferously that the impugned order dated 12.05.2021 and
the reliefs sought are already under active consideration by
the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, with proactive
steps being taken to address cadre concerns. Further, the
reliance on the PGIMER, Chandigarh order is misplaced as it
involved distinct facts, whereas the answering respondent is
bound strictly by the decisions of the MoH&FW. He further
submits that the Coordination Committee recommendations
could not be implemented due to long-standing nomenclature
variations and a decision by the Department of Expenditure.
Finally, that the present Original Application is premature and
barred for non-compliance with Section 20 of the
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, as statutory remedies
have not been exhausted.
6. The counsel for Ministry of Health & Family Welfare further
argued vehemently on the following grounds from his counter
affidavit filed on 01.07.2025 :
(i) First, it was submitted that according to the 6th CPC
recommendations, the entry level of Assistant Radiographer III
was Grade Pay Rs. 1900, Assistant Radiographer II was Grade
Pay Rs. 2400, and Radiographer was Grade Pay Rs. 4200, with
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
21
OA No. 53/2022
subsequent grades at Rs. 4200 and Rs. 4600. AIIMS, New
Delhi had duly issued a detailed order dated 12.05.2021 in
this regard.
(ii) Second, the respondents strongly disputed the validity of the
solitary page annexed by the applicants, clarifying that the
actual Coordination Committee report constituted by the
MoH&FW proposed a distinct cadre restructure for the
Radiology and Radiotherapy cadre.
(iii) Third, it was pointed out that the Department of Expenditure
(DoE) did not agree to the Coordination Committee
recommendations and vide I.D. Note dated 22.12.2021 advised
that proposals for cadre restructuring in different INIs should
be examined independently, taking into account all parameters
such as educational qualifications, recruitment methods, and
feeder posts. While a revised structure for the technical cadre of
AIIMS, New Delhi was approved by the DoE, the proposed
higher pay structure was not agreed to.
(iv) Finally, it was urged that the present Original Application has
been filed prematurely without fulfilling the mandatory
statutory requirements of Section 20 of the Administrative
Tribunals Act, 1985, and thus deserves to be dismissed being
devoid of merit.
7. The counsel for the applicant argued on the basis of the
rejoinder dated 18.11.2023, contending that as per the 6th
CPC report, the entry-level grade pay for Dark Room Assistant
was Rs. 2800 and Dark Room Attendant was Rs. 1800,
whereas Assistant Radiographer Grade III / Dark Room
Assistant Grade III was fixed at Rs. 1900, Grade II at Rs.
2400, and Grade I at Rs. 2800. It was forcefully submitted
that both Radiology Technician Grade II and Radiographer
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
22
OA No. 53/2022
serve as feeder posts sharing the exact same essential
qualification, namely a B.Sc. in Radiology with Physics,
Chemistry, and Biology as compulsory subjects in Class 12th,
yet they have been improperly placed in the same grade pay.
The counsel further highlighted that multiple expert bodies,
including the Coordination Committee, A.B. Dey Committee,
Dr. A.K. Gupta Committee, and the Standing Finance
Committee, supported restructuring the pay scales in
accordance with the 6th CPC proposals, with AIIMS itself
having previously recommended granting the grade pay of Rs.
4600 to Radiology Technician Grade II; however, this
grievance has remained unresolved for over fourteen years.
Lastly, it was urged that complete parity exists in terms of
duties, responsibilities, patient load, qualifications, and
working conditions with PGI, Chandigarh, and that the
Government of Uttarakhand has already granted the Grade
Pay of Rs. 4600 under the 6th CPC to the feeder post of
Radiographer for candidates possessing a graduation in
Radiology Science, rendering the denial of similar benefits to
the applicants wholly arbitrary and unsustainable.
8. This matter was heard at some length by this Bench on
22.04.2024 and the following order was passed :
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
23
OA No. 53/2022
This is the second round of litigation. Earlier the applicants had
approached this Tribunal in OA No. 421/2021 and a direction was
given to the respondents to pass orders on the representations of the
applicants.
Learned counsel submits that the representations have been
rejected by an order dated 12.05.2021 which is the subject matter
of challenge in the present OA. The issue involved in the present
matter pertains to the revision of pay scales of the Radiology and
Radiotherapy cadres.
It is submitted that the pay scales recommended for these cadres by
the Sixth Central Pay Commission have already been implemented
across various Union Government hospitals. Upon acceptance of the
said recommendations, the revised pay scales have been extended
to radiographers working at PGIMER, Chandigarh and JIPMER,
Puducherry. However, the corresponding cadres at AIIMS,
particularly in Radiology and Radiotherapy, have not been granted
the same benefits.
It is further submitted that Respondent No. 4, AIIMS, in its affidavit
dated 12.12.2022, has acknowledged the existence of an anomaly.
In paragraph 17 of the said affidavit, it is admitted that the pay
scales of the feeder cadre and the promotional posts are identical.
The feeder posts include Radiology Technician Grade III and
Radiology Technician Grade II, while the promotional post is
Radiology Technician Grade I.
He submits that the anomaly so far had been admitted by the
respondents AIIMS and further it has been stated that the proposal
has been sent by the Internal Committee for cadre review to the
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
At this stage, Mr. Gyanendra Singh, learned counsel appearing for
the Ministry, seeks to rely upon the counter affidavit to justify the
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
24
OA No. 53/2022
reasons for non-acceptance of the proposal till date and prays for a
short adjournment.
In view of the above, list this matter under part heard category on
15.05.2026.
9. We have heard the matter and observed that the
Respondents – AIIMS, New Delhi and the Ministry of Health &
Family Welfare are merely dilly dallying in this case and have
denied pay parity to the Radiologists of AIIMS as per with their
colleagues in PGI, Chandigarh. The decision of CAT Bench
Chandigarh has been upheld right till the Hon’ble Supreme
Court. With this background when AIIMS – Delhi; PGI –
Chandigarh and JIPMER – Puducherry are sister
organisations and when the junior sister – PGI – Chandigarh
has given the benefit of higher pay scales as per the Sixth Pay
Commission to their Radiology cadre; it would be irrational,
discriminatory and arbitrary if similar benefits are not
extended to the Radiology cadre of AIIMS, Delhi which is the
senior sister of PGI – Chandigarh. We have observed that this
matter has been haplessly and viciously trapped in the
deliberations of two committees of AIIMS – one headed by Dr
A.B. Dey and later headed by Dr Arun Kumar Gupta, but
unfortunately, no relief had been forthcoming from both these
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
25
OA No. 53/2022
committees. This is sheer travesty of justice as it violates
Articles 14 and 16 of the Indian Constitution. We are therefore
of the considered opinion that “enough is enough”; that this
long pending litigation now needs to be closed.
10. The instant OA has merit and deserves to be allowed and
is accordingly allowed. The impugned memorandum dated
12.05.2021 is hereby quashed and set aside. The Respondents
are directed to grant Grade Pay of ₹ 4,600/- to Radiographer
(Radiology Technician Grade-II) as per the recommendations
of the 6th CPC with effect from 01.01.2006, along with the
subsequent pay scales applicable to the promotional posts in
the radiology cadre, namely, Radiology Technician Grade-II,
Radiology Technician Grade-I, Technical Officer (Radiology),
Senior Technical Officer (Radiology) and Chief Technical
Officer (Radiology). The anomaly arising from the feeder post
and the promotional post carrying the same grade pay shall
accordingly be rectified. The Respondents are further directed
to grant the applicants the post of Radiology Technician
pursuant to the merger of Radiology Technician Grade-II and
Radiology Technician Grade-I, with effect from the date of
such merger, i.e., 26.09.2016. The aforesaid benefits, along
with arrears, shall be extended to the applicants within a
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'
26
OA No. 53/2022
period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified
copy of this order. Pending MA, if any, also stands disposed of
in similar manner. However, there will be no order as to costs.
(Dr. Sumeet Jerath) (Harvinder Kaur Oberoi)
Member (A) Member (J)
/nk/
NISHA KUMARI 2026.10.30 17:51:59+05'30'