MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER vs ANIL PRATAP NIKAM

Court
Bombay High Court
Case type
Writ Petition
Decided on
25-03-2026
<div> <b>2026:BHC-AUG:13234</b><br /> 1<br /> 960-wp-4796-2024<br /> IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY<br /> BENCH AT AURANGABAD<br /> WRIT PETITION NO. 4796 OF 2024<br /> Maharashtra State Road Transport<br /> Corporation, Jalgaon Division,<br /> Through its Divisional Controller.<br /> …..PETITIONER<br /> (Orig. Respondent)<br /> VERSUS<br /> Anil S/o. Pratap Nikam,<br /> Age: 45 years, Occu: Service,<br /> R/o Sane Nagar, Amalner,<br /> Tq. Amalner, Dist. Jalgaon.<br /> …..RESPONDENT<br /> (Orig. Complainant)<br /> ______________________________________________________<br /> Mr. M. D. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioner<br /> Mr. M. V. Bhamre, Advocate for Respondent<br /> ______________________________________________________<br /> CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.<br /> TH<br /> DATED : 25 MARCH, 2026<br /> ORAL JUDGMENT :-<br /> . Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.<br /> 2. Heard finally with consent of Mr. M. D. Shinde, learned<br /> Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M. V. Bhamre, learned<br /> Counsel for the respondent.<br /> 3. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order dated<br /> 06.09.2022, passed by the Industrial Court Jalgaon in<br /> Revision Application (ULP) No.11 of 2022 whereby the<br /> Revision Application of the petitioner was dismissed, the<br /><br /> 2<br /> 960-wp-4796-2024<br /> petitioner/M.S.R.T.C. is before this Court in the present<br /> petition.<br /> 4. The facts in the case are not disputed by any party. The<br /> respondent was serving as a driver with the petitioner/<br /> M.S.R.T.C. It so happened that an accident occurred on<br /> 31.07.2019 on Amalner to Indore Road while the respondent<br /> was driving the M.S.R.T.C. bus No.MH 20 BL 2404.<br /> Consequent to the accident, certain news were telecasted on<br /> television alleging that the bus driver was driving the bus in<br /> drunken condition. Relying upon the news flashed on<br /> television as also published in newspapers, the M.S.R.T.C.<br /> invoked the discipline and Appeal Rules particularly clause no.<br /> 6(1) of the Rules, and without conducting any departmental<br /> inquiry dismissed the respondent from the services. <br /> 5. The respondent challenged the dismissal vide complaint<br /> ULP No.32 of 2019 in the Court of learned Judge, Labour<br /> Court, Jalgaon. The Labour Court heard the parties and also<br /> considered to the provisions of Discipline and Appeal Rules of<br /> M.S.R.T.C. It was observed that the respondent was dismissed<br /> from the services merely on the basis of the news flashed on<br /> television as also publications in the newspaper. It was also<br /> observed that the M.S.R.T.C. has not even made an<br /> independent inquiry to confirm the truthfulness of the news<br /> flashed on the television and the newspapers publications.<br /> Observing that the dismissal of the respondent was against the<br /> principles of natural justice and also the concerned provisions<br /> of the Discipline and Appeal Rules of the M.S.R.T.C., the<br /><br /> 3<br /> 960-wp-4796-2024<br /> Labour Court allowed the complaint and directed the<br /> M.S.R.T.C. to reinstate the respondent with 50% back wages. <br /> 6. The said order was taken up in challenge by the<br /> M.S.R.T.C. before the Industrial Court, Jalgaon vide Revision<br /> Application ULP No.11 of 2022. Worth to note the respondent<br /> also challenged the directions given by the Labour Court to<br /> the extent of restraining the back wages to the extent of 50%. <br /> 7. After hearing both the parties, the Industrial Court,<br /> Jalgaon dismissed both the Revision Applications. M.S.R.T.C.<br /> then challenged the orders passed by the Labour Court and<br /> Industrial Court in the present Writ Petition.<br /> 8. With the able assistance of the learned Counsel for the<br /> respective parties, I have gone through the case papers of the<br /> Writ Petition. <br /> 9. Mr. M. D. Shinde, learned Counsel for the M.S.R.T.C.<br /> has produced before me the Discipline and Appeal Rules of<br /> the M.S.R.T.C. Clause no.5 and 6 of the Rules deal about the<br /> action to be taken against an employee in respect of alleged<br /> misconduct. The said clauses read as follows:<br /> 5- xSjorZ.kwdhP;k d`R;klaca/kh dk;Zokghckcr dk;Zin~/krh%<br /> ¼v½ xSjorZ.kwdhP;k d`R;kcn~ny vkjksi Bso.;kr vkysY;k ,[kk|k<br /> deZpkj;kyk rks /kkj.k djhr vlysY;k inkoj pkyq Bso.ks] pkSd’khl<br /> ck/kd gks.;kph fdaok egkeaMGkP;k fgrlaca/kkl vU;Fkk ghrdkjd<br /> gks.;kph ‘kD;rk vlsy rj] l{ke izkf/kdkjh R;kl fuyafcr d#<br /> ‘kdsy- l{ke izkf/kdkjh] vkiY;k LosPNk fu.kZ;kuqlkj] fuyafcr<br /> dj.;kr vkysY;k deZpkj;kyk fuyacukP;k eqnrhr] vkiY;kleksj<br /> vFkok dks.kR;kgh brj vf/kdkj;kleksj fnolkrqu ,d osG gtsjh<br /> yko.;kckcr funsZ’k nsÅ ‘kdsy- ;k fofu;e 83 e/;s rjrwn<br /> dsY;kizek.ks fuokZg HkRrk fdaok iw.kZ osru nsrk ;sbZy-<br /><br /> 4<br /> 960-wp-4796-2024<br /> ¼v½¼1½ deZpkj;koj dks.kR;kgh xSjorZ.kwdhP;k d`R;klkBh<br /> dkjokbZ djko;kph vlsy] v’kh dkjokbZ T;k vgokykoj vk/kkjhr<br /> vkgs] R;ke/khy oLrqfLFkrh ikgqu iqjkos vlY;kl f’kLrHkaxkph dkjokbZ<br /> dj.;kr ;sbZy- vgoky dkYifud ckchaoj vk/kkjhr vlsy vFkok rs<br /> Qdr vgoky dR;kaZps er vlsy] rj v’kk dkYifud ckchaoj<br /> vgoky lknjdR;kZaps er fopkjkr ?ks.;kr ;s.kkj ukgh-<br /> ¼c½ dks.kR;kgh xSjorZ.kwdhP;k d`R;kcn~ny T;k O;Drhfo#)<br /> dk;Zokgh dj.;kps ;ksftys vlsy fryk vkjksikph fdaok<br /> vkjksikaph ,d izr ¼vuqlqph bZ ¼1½ igk½ rlsp] T;koj pkSd’kh<br /> djko;kph vkgs v’kk R;kP;kfo#) dj.;kr vkysY;k vfHkdFku<br /> i=kph izr iqjfo.;kr ;sbZy- vfHkdFku i=k leosr deZpkj;kyk<br /> pkSd’khr T;koj folack;ps rh lk{khph fuosnus] iapukek bR;knh]<br /> lghr loZ nLr,sot iqjfork ;sbZy] vkjksihr deZpkj;kal gs nLr,sot<br /> tj dks.kR;kgh dkj.kklkBh iwjfork ;s.ks ‘kD; ulsy] rj rs u<br /> iwjfo.;kP;k dkj.kkaph uksan dj.;kr ;sbZy-<br /> ¼d½ vkjksfir deZpkj;kus R;kyk @ fryk vkjksii= feGY;kP;k<br /> rkj[ksiklqu ia/kjk fnolkaP;k vkr cpkokps ys[kh fuosnu nk[ky dj.ks]<br /> rlsp tkrhus cktq ekaM.;kph R;kph @ rhph bPNk vlY;kl rls<br /> dGfo.ks vko’;d jkghy-<br /> ¼M½ vkjksfir deZpkj;kus lknj dsysY;k dks.kR;kgh ys[kh fuosnuk<br /> [ksjht R;k O;Drhyk rksaMh fuosnu dj.;kph la/kh nsrk ;sbZy-<br /> ¼bZ½ lacaf/kr dkxni= ikg.;kph vkjksihr deZpkj;kph bPNk<br /> vlY;kl mi [kaM ¼c½ e/;s rjrqn dj.;kr vkysys vfHkdFku i=<br /> R;kyk @ fryk iwjfoY;kuarj] vkjksi fl) dj.;kP;k iz;kstuklkBh<br /> fopkjkr ?ks.;kr ;sr vlrhy fdaok T;koj folacqu jgko;kps vlsy<br /> vls dkxni=] pkSd’kh vf/kdj;kP;k LosPNk fu.kZ;kuwlkj R;kyk @<br /> fryk nk[kfork ;sbZy-<br /> ¼Q½ dkj.ks nk[kok uksVh’khl mRrj feGsi;Zar l{ke izkf/kdkj;kauh<br /> varhe fu.kZ; ?ks.;kiwohZ vkjksihr deZpkj;kyk R;kP;k @ frP;k<br /> cpkokFkZ dks.krsgh nLr,sot pkSd’khP;k dks.kR;kgh VI;koj nk[ky<br /> dj.;kph ewHkk nsrk ;sbZy- vafre vkns’k ns.;kiwohZ dks.kR;kgh VI;koj<br /> nkgksaiSdh dks.kR;kgh i{kkus iwjohysyk dkxnksi=h vFkok vU; Lo#ikpk<br /> iwjkok pkSd’kh vf/kdkj;kl @ l{ke izkf/kdkj;kl nk[ky d#u ?ksrk<br /> ;sbZy-<br /> ¼x½ izdj.kijRos pkSd’kh dj.kkj;k l{ke izkf/kdkj;kus @ pkSd’kh<br /> vf/kdkj;kus ys[kh uksanoko;kph dkj.ks [ksjht d#u] depkj;kyk<br /> fdaok R;kP;k @ frP;k izdj.kh cpko dj.;klkBh [kkyhy [kaM 5<br /> ¼vk;½ P;k vUo;s rjrwn dsY;kuwlkj R;kP;k @ frP;k izfrfu/khyk<br /><br /> 5<br /> 960-wp-4796-2024<br /> R;kP;k @ frP;k cpkokFkZ lk{khnkj dj.;kpk vkf.k T;kP;k iwjkO;koj<br /> vkjksi vk/kkjysyk vkgs] R;k lk{khnkjkaph myV rikl.kh ?ks.;kpk<br /> gDd jkghy v’kkizdkjs lknj dsysyk rksaMh iwjkok uksanfo.;kr ;sbZy-<br /> ¼g½ v’kk lk{khnkjkph lk{k baxzthr vFkok ejkBhr<br /> uksanfo.;kr ;sbZy- ,[kk|k lk{khnkjkph lk{k iq.kZ &gt;kY;kuarj] rh<br /> R;kyk @ fryk letkowu lkax.;kr ;sbZy- vko’;d rj rh nw#Lr<br /> dj.;kr ;sbZy rsOgk] lk{khnkjkus R;k lk{khP;k dks.kR;kgh Hkkxkph<br /> vpwdrk ukdkjY;kl pkSd’kh vf/kdkj;kyk R;k lk{khr nw#Lrh<br /> dj.;k,soth] lk{khnkjkus R;k lk{khyk ?ksrysY;k vk{ksikps Vkp.k djrk<br /> ;sbZy o R;kl vko’;d okVsy vlk vfHkizk; nsrk ;sbZy] lk{k<br /> baxzthr ns.;kr vkyh vlsy o vkjksihr O;Drhyk rh Hkk”kk ifjfpr<br /> ulsy] rj rh lk{k R;kyk @ fryk ekfgr vlysY;k Hkk”ksr okpwu<br /> nk[kfo.;kr ;sbZy o letkowu lkax.;kr ;sbZy- vkjksihr deZpkj;kyk<br /> fuosnukP;k udyk fnY;k tkrhy-<br /> ¼vk;½ vkjksihr deZpkj;kyk R;kP;k @ frP;k cpkoklkBh enr<br /> dj.;kdjhrk ,[kk|k lgdkjh deZpkj;kaekQZr v’kkfjrhus vkiyh cktw<br /> ekaM.;kpk gDd jkghy- ijarw] dkexkjkP;k ckcrhr vkjksihr dkexkj<br /> vkf.k vkjksihr O;Drhph tsFks fu;wDrh dsyh vlsy R;kp ?kVd<br /> dk;kZy;krhy Eg.kts vkxkj @ Vk;j iwu%Lrj.k izdYi @ foHkkxh;<br /> dk;kZy; @ izkns’khd dk;kZy; @ e/;orhZ dk;kZy; @ e/;orhZ<br /> dk;Z’kkGk bR;knhe/khy R;kP;k @ frP;k ilarhP;k dks.kR;kgh<br /> dkexkjkaph lgdkjh deZpkjh Eg.kwu enr ?ksrk ;sbZy] ek= vlk<br /> lgdkjh deZpkjh dkexkj vlY;kps let.;kr ;s.kkj ukgh-<br /> fdaok<br /> rks T;k Jfed la?kkpk lHkkln vkgs] R;kP;k inkf/kdkj;kyk<br /> v’kk pkSd’khP;k osGh mifLFkr jkg.;kpk vf/kdkjh jkghy] vkf.k<br /> vlk dkexkj R;kP;k ilarhpk dkexkj fdaok Jfed la?kkpk<br /> izfruh/kh ;kauk v’kh pkSd’khP;k osGh izdj.kijRos R;kP;k @ frP;k<br /> izdj.kkr fdaok R;k dkexkj izdj.kkr izfrfu/khRo dj.;kpk gDd<br /> jkghy-<br /> ¼ojhy [kaM 5 ¼vk;½ e/khy dkexkj ;kpk vFkZ vkS|ksxhd<br /> lsok;kstuk ¼LFkk;h vkns’k½ vf/kfu;e] 1945 ;k [kkyh ;s.kkjk<br /> deZpkjh vlk gksrks ½<br /> ¼t½¼1½ vkjksfir deZpkj;kafo#+) lk{k ns.;klkBh cksyfoysY;k<br /> lk{khnkjkapk [kpZ iz’kklu lks’khy o vkjksihr deZpkj;kaus fdaok frP;k<br /> lkax.;ko#u cksykoysY;k lk{khnkjkapk [kpZ vkjksfir O;Drh lks’khy-<br /><br /> 6<br /> 960-wp-4796-2024<br /> ijarq] tj vkjksfir deZpkj;kyk iw.kZi.ks funksZ”k Bjfoys o l{ke<br /> izkf/kdkj;kus r’kh f’kQkjl dsyh rj] vkjksfir deZpkj;kus vFkok<br /> frP;k lkax.;ko#u cksykfoysY;k lk{khnkjkaeqGs &gt;kysyk [kpZ iw.kZr%<br /> fdaok va’kr% iz’kklu lks’khy-<br /> ¼t½¼2½ l{ke izkf/kdkjh @ pkSd’kh vf/kdjh lkekU;r% rhuis{kk<br /> vf/kd osGk Lfkfxrh eatwj dj.kkj ukgh- R;kis{kk Lfkfxr l{ke<br /> izkf/kdkj;kP;k @ pkSd’kh vf/kdkj;kaP;k iw.kZ LosPNk fu.kZ;kuqlkj eatqj<br /> djrk ;srhy-<br /> ¼d½ pkSd’kh iw.kZ d#u vkf.k vkjksihr O;Drhph bPNk vlY;kl<br /> fryk ys[kh fdaok rksaMh fuosnu dj.;kph vk.k[kh la/kh fnY;kuarj<br /> pkSd’kh vf/kdkjh v’kk vkjksiklacaf/k vkiys fu”d”kZ o v’kk<br /> fu”d”kkZph dkj.ks ueqn djhy o vihy ;ksX; v’kk f’k{kk izLrkfor<br /> vlrhy rsOgk dkj.ks nk[kok uksVhl nsr vlrkuk l{ke izkf/kdkjh<br /> pkSd’kh fu’d”kkZph izr djkjnkjkl nsbZy-<br /> ¼y½ l{ke izkf/kdkjh R;kaP;k Lor%P;k fu”d”kkZP;k vk/kkjs] fdaok [kaM<br /> 18 vUo;s rjrqn dsY;kizek.ks dks.krkgh pkSd’kh vf/kdkjh fu;qDr<br /> dsysyk vlY;kl R;kP;k fu”d”kkZP;k vk/kkjs] R;kl ;ksX; okVsy vls<br /> vkns’k nsbZy-<br /> ijarw] l{ke izkf/kdkj;kauh f’kLr o vfiy dk;Zi+)rhP;k [kaM<br /> 7 ¼v½ rs ¼x½ ;sFks uewn dsysyh vfiyk;ksX; v’kh dks.krhgh f’k{kk<br /> ykn.kkjk vafre vkns’k ns.;kiwohZ lacaf/kr O;Drhl] izdj.kijRos]<br /> l{ke izkf/kdkj;kaP;k fu”d”kkZph fdaok pkSd’kh vf/kdkj;kaP;k fu”d”kkZph<br /> ,d izr iwjfo.;kr ;sbZy- vkjksihr deZpkj;kus R;kyk @ fryk dkj.ks<br /> nk[kok uksVhl feGkY;kP;k rkj[ksiklqu 7 fnolkaP;k vkr ys[kh mRrj<br /> ns.ks vko’;d jkghy-<br /> vk.k[kh vls dh] ,[kknk ljdkjh [kkR;kr /kkj.kkf/kdkj<br /> vlysY;k egkeaMGkdMs izfrfu;qDrhoj vlysY;k ljdkjh<br /> depkj;kfo#) f’kLrHkaxkph dkjokbZ dj.;kps ;ksftys vlsy] rsOgk<br /> v’kk depkj;kfo#) eqacbZ ukxjh lsok fu;e ;k vUo;s leqfpr<br /> dkjokbZ dj.;klkBh R;kyk R;kP;k ewG [kkR;kdMs izR;kofrZr<br /> dj.;kr ;sbZy-<br /> ¼e½ jkT; ifjogu deZpkj;koj f’k{kk ykn.kkjk izR;sd vkns’k<br /> R;kyk ys[kh dGfo.;kr ;sbZy-<br /> 6- iq&lt;hy izdj.kh [kaM 5 e/;s ?kkyqu fnysyh dk;Zi)rh<br /> vuwlj.;kph vko’;drk vl.kkj ukgh o R;klaca/kh rjrwnhaiSdh<br /> dks.krhgh fdaok loZ rjrwnh lksMwu nsrk ;srhy-<br /><br /> 7<br /> 960-wp-4796-2024<br /> ¼1½ vkjksihr O;Drh vkjksi dcwy djhr vlsy rsOgk vkf.k<br /> izdj.kkrhy rF;koj f’k{kk vk/kkjhr vlsy rsOgk-<br /> ¼2½ T;kewGs vkjksihr O;Drh QkStnkjh U;k;ky;kr nks”kh<br /> Bjysyh vlsy] R;k rF;koj f’k{kk vk/kkjhr vlsy rsOgk-<br /> ¼3½ vkjksihr O;Drh Qjkjh &gt;kysyh vlsy rsOgk fdaok brj<br /> dkj.kkLro frP;k’kh i=O;ogkj dj.ks vO;ogk;Z vlsy rsOgk-<br /> ¼4½ iq&lt;hy izdj.kh [kaM e/;s rjrqn dsY;kizek.ks l{ke<br /> izkf/kdkj;kl laf{kIr dk;Zokgh djrk ;sbZy-<br /> ¼v½ dks.krsgh xSjorZuwdhps d`R; vlrkuk fdaok djhr<br /> vlrkuk dks.kR;kgh deZpkj;kl izR;{k idMys vlsy v’kk ckcrhr-<br /> ¼c½ xSjorZ.kwdhpk m?kM iwjkok vlsy] v’kk ckcrhr-<br /> ¼d½ xSjorZ.kwd vR;ar xaHkhj Lo#ikph fdaok [kk=h iVfo.kkjh<br /> vlwu usgehph dk;Zi)rh vko’;d okVr ulsy] v’kk ckcrhr-<br /> 10. The sole contention of the petitioner is that the<br /> respondent’s case is covered by clause no.6(1) and hence the<br /> M.S.R.T.C. was justified in not conducting any departmental<br /> inquiry. Looking to the clause no.6(1) of the Rules, it is<br /> admitted fact that the respondent has not and never accepted<br /> the guilt alleged by the M.S.R.T.C. Secondly, so far as<br /> truthfulness of the offence is concerned, Mr. Shinde, learned<br /> Counsel for the M.S.R.T.C. would fairly argue that the action<br /> was taken on the basis of the news items flashed on the<br /> television as also publication of newspapers. It is a matter of<br /> fact that no independent inquiry about confirmation of the<br /> truthfulness of the news items was conducted by the<br /> M.S.R.T.C. As such, in any case, the M.S.R.T.C. was not<br /> justified in dismissing the petitioner by taking recourse to Rule<br /> 6(1) of the Discipline and Appeal Rules.<br /><br /> 8<br /> 960-wp-4796-2024<br /> 11. Mr. Shinde, learned Counsel for the petitioner/<br /> M.S.R.T.C. would raised specific objection as to the grant of<br /> 50% back wages as was ordered by the Labour Court and<br /> confirmed by the Industrial Court. <br /> 12. As far as the objection raised by learned Counsel for the<br /> petitioner regarding back wages, no convincing material is<br /> placed on record to hold that the finding of the Labour Court<br /> and Industrial Court are erroneous on that point.<br /> 13. I do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the<br /> Labour Court as also the Industrial Court. The petitioner/<br /> M.S.R.T.C. has failed to show any perversity in the judgments.<br /> On the other hand, both the Labour Court and Industrial<br /> Court have correctly appreciated the facts of the case<br /> comparing the same with the Discipline and Appeal Rules of<br /> the M.S.R.T.C. Consequently, the Writ Petition fails and<br /> accordingly stands dismissed.<br /> 14. It appears that the order or the Labour Court directing<br /> the M.S.R.T.C. to reinstate the respondent is of the year 2021.<br /> For no reasons and without there being any preventive order,<br /> the petitioner/M.S.R.T.C. has not even reinstated the<br /> respondent. This is a matter of serious concern and in fact a<br /> contemptuous act of the responsible officers of the M.S.R.T.C.<br /> I am of the considered and definite view that a decision<br /> rendered by a Court does not form ‘justice’ in its true meaning<br /> unless it is executed and implemented. A decree on paper is of<br /> no use. The authority on whom liability of decree/order of<br /><br /> 9<br /> 960-wp-4796-2024<br /> Court is casted, if fail to obey it timely, need to be dealt<br /> seriously. Those authorities are answerable to this Court.<br /> 15. The petitioner/ M.S.R.T.C. without any default shall<br /> reinstate the petitioner within a period of four weeks from<br /> today and shall clear payable back wages in terms of the<br /> orders passed by the Labour Court and the Industrial Court<br /> within two weeks from today. Default in following these<br /> directions shall have serious consequences.<br /> 16. Rule stands discharged.<br /> 17. Place this matter on 22.04.2026 for confirmation of<br /> compliance by the petitioner.<br /> ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )<br /> Rushikesh/2026</div>