TRILOCHAN PRASAD SARTHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
- Court
- Chhattisgarh High Court
- Case type
- MISC.CRIMINAL CASE (ANTICIPATORY BAIL)
- Decided on
- 02-04-2026
<div> 1<br /> <b>2026:CGHC:15374</b><br /> <br /> <br /> 2026:CGHC:15374<br /> <b>NAFR </b><br /> <b>HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR</b><br /> <b>MCRCA No. 454 of 2026</b><br /> Trilochan Prasad Sarthi S/o Shri Rajju Lal Sarthi Aged About 37 Years <br /> R/o 190, Durga Chowk, Bitkuli, Post Nawapara, District - Baloda Bazar <br /> (C.G.)<br /> <b>... Applicant</b><br /> <b>versus</b><br /> State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Station- Chhuriya, District- <br /> Rajnandgaon (C.G.)<br /> <b>... Respondent</b> <br /> For Applicant <b>:</b> Shri Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate.<br /> For <br /> <b>:</b> Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, Dy.G.A.<br /> Respondent/State <br /> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b>Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice</b><br /> <b>Order On Board </b><br /> <b>02/04/2026</b><br /> 1. The applicant has preferred this application under Section 482 of <br /> the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), <br /> for grant of anticipatory bail, apprehending his arrest in connection <br /> with Crime No.294/2025, registered at Police Station Chhuriya <br /> District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) for alleged commission of offence <br /><br /> 2<br /> <b>2026:CGHC:15374</b><br /> punishable under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, <br /> 340(2), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.<br /> 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that complainant has lodged <br /> the report to the concerned police station stating that under the <br /> Pradhan Mantri Fasal Beema Yojana, year 2024-25, in the village <br /> of Amgaon in Chhuriya Block, over 50 hectares of land was <br /> registered in 34 Khasra in the name of Mr. Jai Bagga, Mr. Vaibhav <br /> Goldhha and Mr. Sundarshan Verma, partners of Rallij Bio Energy <br /> Private Limited. A banana crop had been cultivated on this land for <br /> over a year. Despite this, in the year 2024-25, Fasal Beema <br /> Yojana was obtained on the said land by showing a chickpea <br /> crop. Without any harvesting or preparation of a Panchnama, and <br /> in collusion with Agriculture Department officials, the Patwari and <br /> the insurance agent, claims were processed and insurance <br /> payouts exceeding Rs. 25 lakhs were wrongfully disbursed by <br /> showing loss of a non-existent checkpea crop. The Police Station <br /> Chhuriya has lodged the first information report on 12.12.2025 <br /> under the Crime No. 0294/2025 for the offence punishable Under <br /> Sections 316(5), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of the <br /> Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. <br /> 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present <br /> applicant has falsely been implicated in the aforesaid case, and <br /> has not committed any offence. He would submit that only <br /> allegation against the present applicant is that he has verified the <br /><br /> 3<br /> <b>2026:CGHC:15374</b><br /> documents illegally and provided benefit to other co-accused <br /> person. He would submit that the present applicant is a reputed <br /> person of the society and if he is kept behind the bar then his <br /> whole future will be ruined. He would further submit that the <br /> applicant is a permanent resident of address mentioned in the <br /> cause title and there is no likelihood of absconding, the applicant <br /> undertakes to abide by any conditions imposed by this Court, <br /> therefore, he submits that the present applicant is entitled to be <br /> released on anticipatory bail.<br /> 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel has opposed the prayer <br /> for grant of anticipatory bail. She would submit that the allegations <br /> against the applicant pertains to serious economic offences <br /> involving fraudulent verification and illegal transfer of substantial <br /> crop insurance amounts into the bank accounts of co-accused <br /> persons, therefore the applicant is not entitled for grant of <br /> anticipatory bail.<br /> 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the <br /> materials available on record.<br /> 6. Considering the facts & circumstances of the case, submission of <br /> learned counsel for the parties, materials available on record, <br /></div><table><thead><tr><th>further the fact that</th><th>allegations against the applicant pertains to</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table><div><br /> serious economic offences involving fraudulent verification and <br /> illegal transfer of substantial crop insurance amounts into the bank <br /></div><table><thead><tr><th>accounts of co-accused persons,</th><th>c</th><th>onsidering the seriousness of</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table><div><br /><br /> 4<br /> <b>2026:CGHC:15374</b><br /> the allegations and also considering the fact that investigation is <br /> still going on, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the <br /> applicant.<br /> 7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant - <br /> <b>Trilochan Prasad Sarthi</b> , involved in Crime No.294/2025, <br /> registered at Police Station Chhuriya District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) <br /> for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections <br /> 316(5), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of the Bharatiya <br /> Nyay Sanhita, 2023 is <b>rejected</b> . <b> </b> <b>Sd/-Sd</b><br /> <b>S</b> <b> S</b> <b>Sd/- </b><br /> <b> (Ramesh Sinha)</b><br /> <b> </b> <b> Chief Justice</b><br /> <br /> gouri<br /> </div>