Unoxpress Mobility Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Authorized Representative Sh. Avinash Kumar vs Mr. Keshav Khaneja Resolution Professional Of Gensol Ev Lease Limited
- Court
- National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
- Case type
- Company Appeal(AT)(Ins)
- Decided on
- 12-03-2026
<div> <b>NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, </b><br /> <b>PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 471 of 2026 </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>In the matter of: </b><br /> <b> </b> <b> </b><br /> <b>Unoxpress Mobility Pvt. Ltd. </b> <b> ....Appellant </b><br /> <b>Vs. </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>Keshav Khaneja, Resolution Professional of Gensol </b><br /> <b>EV Lease Ltd. </b><br /> <b> …Respondent </b><br /> <b>For Appellant </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>Mr. Rachit Mittal, Mr. Yashraj Singh, Mr. Deepale </b><br /> <b>Jhangeea, Mr. Kanishk Raj, Mr. Abhishek Sinha </b><br /> <b>and Mr. Shivansh Bansal, Advocates. </b><br /> <b>For Respondent </b> <b> </b><br /> <b>ORDER </b><br /> <b>(Hybrid Mode) </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>12.03.2026: </b> Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant and the Learned <br /> Counsel for the Respondent No.1. <br /> 2. This Appeal has been filed against the order dated 20.02.2026 passed <br /> by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Division <br /> Bench, Court-1, Ahmedabad in IA No.1511(AHM)2025. The IA was filed by the <br /> Resolution Professional praying for following reliefs:- <br /> <i>“11. In the light of the facts and circumstances stated herein </i><br /> <i>above it is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may </i><br /> <i>be graciously please to: </i><br /> <i>(i) To allow the present application; </i><br /><br /> 2 <br /> <br /> <i>(ii) To direct the Respondent to forthwith return the 150 EV </i><br /> <i>Vehicles to the Applicant as per the list annexed in the </i><br /> <i>application; </i><br /> <i>(iii) To direct the Respondent to pay the outstanding dues </i><br /> <i>which amounting to Rs. 1,14,21,876.00/- along-with all </i><br /> <i>late payment charges, cost, etc. to the Applicant as per the </i><br /> <i>master lease agreement dated 28.12.2023; </i><br /> <i>(iv) Pass such other or further order / order(s) as may be </i><br /> <i>deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of </i><br /> <i>the instant case. </i><br /> <i>12. Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present </i><br /> <i>application, the applicant humbly prays that this Hon'ble </i><br /> <i>Tribunal may be pleased to: </i><br /> <i>(i) To issue interim directions for restraining the </i><br /> <i>Respondent, his agents, employees or any third parties, </i><br /> <i>from alienating, encumbering, transferring,</i> <i> </i> <i>creating third </i><br /> <i>party rights over, or otherwise dealing with the leased </i><br /> <i>vehicles/assets; </i><br /> <i>(ii) To direct Respondent to disclose to the Applicant the </i><br /> <i>present location of all the leased vehicles/assets; </i><br /> <i>(iii) To direct the Respondent to allow and cooperate with </i><br /> <i>the Applicant and/or its authorised representative and/or </i><br /> <i>valuers to forthwith inspect the leased vehicles/assets </i><br /> <i>and verify their condition; </i><br /> <i>(iv) Ad interim relief in respect of prayers under para (i) to </i><br /> <i>(iii) </i><br /> <b>Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 471 of 2026 </b><br /> <br /><br /> 3 <br /> <br /> <i>(v) Pass such further interim order/order (s) as this Hon'ble </i><br /> <i>Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and </i><br /> <i>circumstances of the instant case.” </i> <br /> 3. The Appellant claim to have filed a reply to which rejoinder is also filed. <br /> Adjudicating Authority by the impugned order has directed the matter to be <br /> listed for further consideration on 17.03.2026 and has further directed that <br /> the Respondent (Appellant herein) to expedite the process and ensure <br /> complete handover of the vehicles, as undertaken, on or before the next date <br /> of hearing and further Respondent is also directed to clear the outstanding <br /> lease rentals for the period of default and to pay charges for continued usage <br /> of the vehicles till the date of actual handover. <br /> 4. The grievance of the Appellant is that Appellant has filed a reply to the <br /> application where claim of the Appellant was also stated and without adverting <br /> to the said reply, direction has been issued which is finally allowed the <br /> application. <br /> 5. Counsel for the Respondent submits that the vehicles are not being <br /> handed over to the Resolution Professional and although the payments are <br /> received by the Appellant from the vendors but payments have not been made. <br /> 6. We have heard Counsel for the parties and perused the record. The order <br /> which was passed by the Adjudicating Authority on 20.02.2026 is interim in <br /> nature. Since the Court has already directed for list the matter for further <br /> consideration on 17.03.2026, we are of the view that it is open for the <br /> Appellant to raise its pleas and submissions when the matter is heard on the <br /> <b>Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 471 of 2026 </b><br /> <br /><br /> 4 <br /> <br /> next date i.e. on 17.03.2026. We are not inclined to enter into the issues raised <br /> by the parties in this Appeal. <br /> 7. With the above observations, we dispose of the Appeal. <br /> <br /> <b> [Justice Ashok Bhushan] </b><br /> <b>Chairperson </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>[Barun Mitra]</b> <b> </b><br /> <b>Member (Technical) </b><br /> <b><i>Anjali/md </i></b><br /> <br /> <b>Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 471 of 2026 </b><br /> </div>