VIJAY RAJ NAGWANSHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
- Court
- Chhattisgarh High Court
- Case type
- MISC.CRIMINAL CASE (ANTICIPATORY BAIL)
- Decided on
- 25-03-2026
<div> 1<br /> <b>2026:CGHC:14383</b><br /> <br /> <br /> 2026:CGHC:14383<br /> <b>NAFR </b><br /> <b>HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR</b><br /> <b>MCRCA No. 180 of 2026</b><br /> Vijay Raj Nagwanshi S/o Late Shri Ganesh Singh Nagwanshi Aged <br /> About 38 Years R/o House Number 28, Yash Town, Tulsipur, <br /> Rajnandgaon Tehsil And District Rajnandgoan C.G.<br /> <b>... Applicant</b><br /> <b>versus</b><br /> State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station <br /> Bortalab District Rajnandgaon C.G.<br /> <b>... Respondent</b> <br /> For Applicant <b>:</b> Shri Aditya Bhardwaj, Advocate.<br /> For <br /> <b>:</b> Shri Shailendra Sharma, PL.<br /> Respondent/State <br /> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b><br /> <b> Hon'ble Shri </b> <b> </b> <b> Ramesh Sinha</b> <b> </b> <b> , Chief Justice</b> <b> </b> <b> </b><br /> <b>Order on Board</b><br /> <b>25/03/2026</b><br /> 1. Learned State counsel submits that the notice of the bail <br /> application has already been served to the complainant i.e. <br /> mother of the victim. Despite of notice being served, the <br /> complainant is not present either in person or through her counsel <br /><br /> 2<br /> <b>2026:CGHC:14383</b><br /> or through virtual mode from DLSA, therefore the Court proceeds <br /> to hear the matter.<br /> 2. This first anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the <br /> Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the <br /> applicant, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with <br /> Crime No.01/2026 registered at Police Station – Bortalab, District <br /> Rajnandgaon (C.G) for the offences punishable under Sections <br /> 64(1), 61(2), 337, 338, 339, and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya <br /> Sanhita (BNS), Sections 4 and 21 of the POCSO Act, and Section <br /> 80 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act <br /> (correct as per page no.17)<br /> 3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the Mother of the Victim <br /> has lodged a Report to the effect that her daughter is a minor and <br /> is aged about 15 years, in the month of March her daughter states <br /> that she is vomiting and then her mother called for a doctor and <br /> the doctor gave some medicine for Stopping Vomiting and then <br /> she recovered then in the Month of September she stated to her <br /> mother that her stomach is aching and she is feeling like <br /> something is happening in her stomach then her mother told to <br /> her family members then they took her to the Private Hospital and <br /> they came to know that the Victim is Pregnant, when asked from <br /> the Victim she stated that she is in a relationship with a Boy who <br /> is also a Minor Namely Aditya Verma they both used to study <br /> together in the School but after failing in class 9th the boy left the <br /> school and they used to text each other and they both have made <br /><br /> 3<br /> <b>2026:CGHC:14383</b><br /> physical relations with each other and because of that she is <br /> pregnant when her Relatives Dewar and Dewarani took her to the <br /> Private Hospital Namely Kumud Mohabe Hospital, she delivered a <br /> Boy Child and the Hospital Staff in collusion with other person <br /> gave that child illegally for adoption to other co-accused Ravi <br /> Barve and Meena Barve who are the resident of Durg and her <br /> Birth Certificate was forged. The present applicant, Vijay Raj <br /> Nagvanshi, despite knowing the victim was a 15-year-old minor <br /> and being aware of the sexual exploitation, did not lodge any <br /> formal complaint. The evidence suggests his involvement in a <br /> scheme to give false information, prepare a sworn affidavit, and <br /> criminally conspire with hospital staff to create official <br /> documentation for the child born from the assault, thereby playing <br /> a significant role in the alleged offences. <br /> 4. Learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant, Dr. Vijay Raj <br /> Nagvanshi is merely a part-time duty doctor and neither <br /> conducted the delivery nor issued any birth certificate. He would <br /> submit that there is no allegation that he performed any medical <br /> procedure or created any false medical record. It is further <br /> submitted that the applicant did not derive any financial or <br /> material benefit, and there is no element of trafficking or illegal <br /> gain. His conduct does not indicate participation in any criminal <br /> conspiracy but rather reflects a bona fide act under a mistaken <br /></div><table><thead><tr><th>belief.</th><th>He would submit that the applicant is a permanent resident</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table><div><br /> of address shown in the cause title of the bail application and <br /><br /> 4<br /></div><table><thead><tr><th>undertakes to cooperate with the investigation,</th><th>t</th><th>herefore, he</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table><div><br /> submits that the present applicant is entitled to be released on <br /> anticipatory bail. <br /> 5. On the other hand, learned State counsel, appearing for the non -<br /> applicant/State, opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. <br /> 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the <br /> materials available on record.<br /> 7. Considering the facts & circumstances of the case, submission of <br /> learned counsel for the parties, materials available on record, <br /> considering the nature of allegation levelled against the applicant <br /></div><table><thead><tr><th>who is a doctor</th><th>and also considering the fact that investigation</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table><table><thead><tr><th>and trial are likely to take some time,</th><th>without commenting</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table><table><thead><tr><th>anything on the merits of the case</th><th>, I am inclined to grant</th></tr></thead><tbody></tbody></table><div><br /> anticipatory bail to the present applicant.<br /> 8. Accordingly, the instant MCRCA is <b>allowed</b> and it is directed that <br /> in the event of arrest of the applicant – <b> Vijay Raj Nagwanshi</b> , on <br /> executing a personal bond and one surety in the like sum to the <br /> satisfaction of the arresting Officer, he shall be released on bail on <br /> the following conditions:-<br /> (a) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any<br /> inducement, threat or promise to any person<br /> acquainted with the facts of the case so as to<br /> dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the<br /> Court.<br /><br /> 5<br /> <b>2026:CGHC:14383</b><br /> (b) The applicant shall not act in any manner which will <br /> be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial.<br /> (c) The applicant shall appear before the trial Court on <br /> each and every date given to him by the said Court till<br /> disposal of the trial.<br /> (d) The applicant and the surety shall submit a copy of <br /> his adhaar card along with a coloured postcard full size <br /> photo having printed the adhaar number on it, which <br /> shall be verified by the trial Court. <br /> (e) The applicant shall not involve himself in any offence <br /> of similar nature in future.<br /> Sd/-<br /> <b> </b> <b>(Ramesh Sinha)</b><br /> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> Chief Justice</b><br /> <br /> gouri<br /> </div>