Siddique vs State Of Kerala

Court
Supreme Court
Case type
Criminal Appeal
Decided on
19-11-2024
<pre> <b><i>REPORTABLE </i></b>
<b> </b>
<b> </b>
<b>IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</b>
<b>CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION</b>
<b> </b>
<b> </b>
2024 INSC 877
<b>CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.4625 OF 2024</b>
<b>(Arising out of SLP(Criminal) No.13463 of 2024)</b>
<b> </b>
<b> </b>
<b>SIDDIQUE </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> ...APPELLANT(s)</b>

<b> </b>
<b> </b>
<b>VERSUS</b>
<b> </b>
<b>STATE OF KERALA &amp; ANR. </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> ...RESPONDENT(S)</b>
<b> </b>
<b> </b>
<b>J U D G M E N T </b>
<b> </b>
<b>1.</b> <b> </b> <b>Leave granted. </b>
<b>2.</b> <b> </b> <b>The present appeal is directed against the judgment </b>
<b>and order dated 24.09.2024, passed by the High Court </b>
<b>of Kerala at Ernakulam in Bail Application No.7331 </b>
<b>of 2024, rejecting the said application filed by the </b>
<b>appellant – accused seeking anticipatory bail under </b>
<b>Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with the </b>
<b>F.I.R. being Crime No.1192 of 2024 dated 27.08.2024 </b>
<b>registered </b> <b>at </b> <b>Police </b> <b>Station </b> <b>Museum, </b> <b>District </b>
<b>Thiruvananthapuram City, for the offence under </b>
<b>Sections 376 and 506 IPC. </b>
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
RAVI ARORA
Date: 2024.11.20
17:03:40 IST
Reason:
<b>3.</b> <b> </b> <b>Heard learned senior counsel/counsel for the parties </b>
<b>at length. </b>
1

<b>4.</b> <b> </b> <b>Having regard to the submissions made by the learned </b>
<b>senior counsels for the parties and perusing the </b>
<b>documents on record including the pleadings, we deem </b>
<b>it appropriate not to assign elaborate reasons, </b>
<b>particularly considering the sensitivity of the </b>
<b>case. </b> <b>However, </b> <b>considering </b> <b>the </b> <b>fact </b> <b>that </b> <b>the </b>
<b>complainant had lodged the complaint almost eight </b>
<b>years after the alleged incident, which had taken </b>
<b>place in 2016 and the fact that she had also posted </b>
<b>the post on facebook somewhere in 2018, making </b>
<b>allegations against about 14 people, including the </b>
<b>appellant with regard to the alleged sexual abuse, </b>
<b>as also the fact that she had not gone to the </b>
<b>Justice Hema Committee constituted by the High Court </b>
<b>of Kerala for ventilating her grievance, we are </b>
<b>inclined to accept the present appeal, subject to </b>
<b>certain conditions mentioned hereinafter. </b>
<b>5.</b> <b> </b> <b>In that view of the matter, it is directed that in </b>
<b>the event of arrest of appellant in connection with </b>
<b>the F.I.R. being Crime No.1192 of 2024 dated </b>
<b>27.08.2024 registered at Police Station Museum, </b>
<b>District Thiruvananthapuram City, for the offence </b>
<b>under Sections 376 and 506 IPC, he shall be released </b>
<b>on bail, subject to the conditions that may be </b>
2

<b>imposed by the Trial Court, including the condition </b>
<b>that the appellant shall deposit the passport before </b>
<b>the Trial Court and shall cooperate with the </b>
<b>Investigating </b> <b>Officer </b> <b>in </b> <b>carrying </b> <b>out </b> <b>the </b>
<b>investigation. </b>
<b>6.</b> <b> </b> <b>It is needless to say that any breach of the </b>
<b>conditions that may be imposed by the Trial Court </b>
<b>for releasing him on bail, shall entail cancellation </b>
<b>of the bail. </b>
<b>7.</b> <b> </b> <b>Subject to the afore-stated, the present appeal </b>
<b>stands allowed. </b>
<b>8.</b> <b> </b> <b>Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed </b>
<b>of. </b>

<b>......................J.</b>
<b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> (BELA M. TRIVEDI)</b>
<b> </b>
<b> </b>
<b> </b>
<b>......................J.</b>
<b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> </b> <b> (SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA)</b>
<b> </b>
<b>NEW DELHI;</b>
<b>TH </b>
<b>19</b> <b>NOVEMBER, 2024. </b>
3 </pre>