K. Chandrashekaran & Ors. vs Ashwani Kumar Gupta & Ors.
- Court
- National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
- Case type
- IA
- Decided on
- 30-03-2026
<div> <b>NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL </b><br /> <b>AT CHENNAI </b><br /> <b> (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) </b><br /> <b>Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 211 / 2022 </b><br /> <b>(IA Nos. 466/2022 & 1145/2023) </b><br /> <b>In the matter of: </b><br /> <b>Mr. K Chandrashekaran </b><br /> New No. 26, Vaidyaraman Street, <br /> T Nagar, Chennai - 600017 <b> ….Appellant No. 1 </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>Wembley Holdings Ltd. </b><br /> Suit 208, Eden Plaza, <br /> Eden Island, Mahe, Seychelles, <br /> Through its Authorized Representative, <br /> R. Sankarakrishnan, <br /> 504, Niharika, Film City Road, <br /> Yashodham, Goregaon, Maharashtra, <br /> India – 400063 <b>….Appellant No. 2 </b> <br /> <br /> <b>V </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>Mr. Ashwani Kumar Gupta </b><br /> <b>Erstwhile Resolution Professional of </b><br /> <b>M/s. Infodrive Software Limited </b><br /> Having registered office at <br /> C-402, Cauvery Serenity, <br /> #10/1–1, Raghvendra Extension, <br /> Tumkur Road, Yeshwanthpur, Bangalore <b> - </b> 560022 <b> ….Respondent No. 1 </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>Mr. Mahalingam Suresh Kumar </b><br /> Liquidator of <br /> M/s. Infodrive Software Limited <br /> Having registered office at <br /> SPP & Co, no.27/9, Nivedh Vikas, <br /> Pankaja Mill Road, Puliyakulam, <br /> Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu <b> – </b> 641028 <b> ….Respondent No. 2 </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <br /> <b>Present: </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> For Appellants : <b> </b> Mr. TK. Bhaskar & Ms. Niveditha Narayanan, Advocates <br /> <br /> For Respondents : <b> </b> Mr. Ashwani Kumar Gupta, Erstwhile RP/R1 <br /> <b> </b><br /> <br /> Comp. App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 211 / 2022 Page <b>1</b> of <b>5</b> <br /> <br /><br /> <b>O R D E R </b><br /> <b>(Hybrid Mode) </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>30.03.2026:</b> <br /> 1. Heard the Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellants as well as Mr. Ashwani <br /> Kumar Gupta, erstwhile Resolution Professional, appearing-in-person. <br /> 2. This Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (INS) No. 211 / 2022, has been preferred <br /> by the Committee of Creditors challenging the order dated 06.04.2022, that was <br /> passed by Ld. NCLT, Special Bench – II, Chennai. <br /> 3. By order dated 06.04.2022, the Ld. Adjudicating Authority has directed for <br /> liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. <br /> 4. Ld. Counsel for the Appellants submitted that, Mr. Ashwani Kumar Gupta, <br /> who was appointed as the Resolution Professional in the CIRP of the Corporate <br /> Debtor, as he expressed his unwillingness to continue, which was considered in <br /> th<br /> the 5 CoC Meeting held on 03.10.2020. The CoC resolved to appoint Mr. Sathiq <br /> Buhari and the Application for change of Resolution Professional was duly filed <br /> on 03.11.2020. <br /> 5. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the Appellant that IA No. 128 (CHE) <br /> / 2021, that was filed by the erstwhile RP Mr. Ashwani Kumar Gupta, praying <br /> for liquidation and for exclusion of certain period, was without any authority of <br /> CoC. <br /> <br /> Comp. App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 211 / 2022 Page <b>2</b> of <b>5</b> <br /> <br /><br /> 6. The Ld. Adjudicating Authority heard the application and by the impugned <br /> order dated 06.04.2022, has passed an order for liquidation. <br /> <br /> 7. It is submitted that this Tribunal had passed an Interim Order on <br /> 08.07.2022, staying the order dated 06.04.2022 and the liquidation proceeding <br /> was thus stayed. <br /> <br /> 8. The erstwhile RP Mr. Ashwani Kumar Gupta appearing-in-person submits <br /> that, till the RP is replaced by the Ld. Adjudicating Authority, the earlier RP has <br /> to continue and hence, he has filed the application for liquidation. It is further <br /> submitted that, at present the RP is aggrieved only by the adverse observation, <br /> made against the RP in the impugned order. The erstwhile Resolution <br /> Professional has no objection, if the Liquidation is not continued and some <br /> Expression of Interest is received. <br /> <br /> 9. We have considered the submission of the Ld. Counsel appearing for the <br /> Appellant, as well as the erstwhile RP / R1 appearing-in-person and perused the <br /> records. From the fact brought on the record, it is on the record that, the CoC has <br /> passed a resolution for replacement of the RP and the application was also filed <br /> to that effect, before the Ld. Adjudicating Authority and during pendency of the <br /> said application, Liquidation Order has been passed. <br /> <br /> Comp. App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 211 / 2022 Page <b>3</b> of <b>5</b> <br /> <br /><br /> 10. It is further submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the Appellant that the CoC <br /> never decided to pass a resolution for Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. <br /> 11. The resolution for replacement of the Resolution Professional having taken <br /> place and present is the case where a request was made by the RP expressing his <br /> unwillingness to continue as RP due to his old age. <br /> <br /> 12. We are of the view that, submission of the erstwhile RP appearing-in-<br /> person that, till the order is passed by the Ld. Adjudicating Authority, the RP was <br /> to continue can be accepted. But, in the present case, RP filing the application for <br /> liquidation was unsustainable, when CoC had already resolved to replace him. <br /> However, we are of the view that any adverse observations made against Mr. <br /> Ashwani Kumar Gupta, the erstwhile RP shall not be treated to be adverse to the <br /> erstwhile RP and the adverse observation to that extent shall stand expunged from <br /> the order. <br /> <br /> 13. In view of the aforesaid, we set aside the Order of Liquidation dated <br /> 06.04.2022 and the Appeal being Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (INS) No. 211 / <br /> 2022 is disposed of, by expunging the adverse observation against the RP <br /> Mr. Ashwani Kumar Gupta. <br /> 14. At this stage, the Ld. Counsel appearing for the new RP submitted that, he <br /> does not possess the AFA anymore. <br /> <br /> Comp. App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 211 / 2022 Page <b>4</b> of <b>5</b> <br /> <br /><br /> 15. In view of the aforesaid, the Ld. Counsel for the Appellant submits that, <br /> they shall convene a meeting and make a fresh recommendations and thereafter <br /> file a proper application. The Appeal is disposed of accordingly. <br /> <br /> <br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>[Justice Ashok Bhushan] </b><br /> <b>(Chairperson) </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>[Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma] </b><br /> <b>Member (Judicial) </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>[Jatindranath Swain] </b><br /> <b>Member (Technical) </b><br /> <br /> <br /> SR/MS/AK <b> </b><br /> <br /> Comp. App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 211 / 2022 Page <b>5</b> of <b>5</b> <br /> </div>