Kanchana Gattu & Ors. vs Hotel Parklane Pvt Ltd & Ors.
- Court
- National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
- Case type
- Company Appeal(AT)
- Decided on
- 02-04-2026
<div> <b>NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL </b><br /> <b>AT CHENNAI </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>Company Appeal (AT) (CH) No.143/2025 </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>IN THE MATTER OF: </b><br /> <b>Mrs. Kanchana Gattu </b><br /> Add: 7130 Sanner RD, <br /> Clarksville Maryland - 21029, USA. <b> ….Appellant No. 1 </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>Mr. Pillarisetty Venkata Siddhartha </b><br /> Add: Flat No. 302, Plot No. 6-3-597, <br /> Indra heights, Venkata Ramana Colony, Khairtabad, <br /> Hyderabad 500004, Telangana, India <b>….Appellant No. 2 </b> <br /> <br /> <b>Vs </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>M/s. Hotel Parklane PVT LTD </b><br /> Having Registered office at, <br /> H. No: 1-7-378, ΤΟ 391/6115, Parklane, <br /> Secunderabad - 500003 Telangana, India. <b>….Respondent No. 1 </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>Mrs. Boggarapu Krishnamurthy Praveena </b><br /> Add: 6-1-275/A&B, Padma Rao Nagar, Walker Town, <br /> Secunderabad – 500003 , Telangana, India. <b>….Respondent No. 2 </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>Mrs. Pillarisetty Karuna </b><br /> Add: Flat No. 302, Plot No. 6-3-597, <br /> Indra heights, Venkata Ramana Colony, Khairtabad, <br /> Hyderabad - 500004, Telangana, India. <b>….Respondent No. 3 </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>Ms. Pooja Boggaram </b><br /> Add: H No. 6-1-275, Dundoo Mansion, <br /> Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad - 500025, <b> </b><br /> Telangana, India. <b> ….Respondent No. 4 </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>CA. Allamsetti Kesava Rao </b><br /> Add: Allamsetti & Company, <br /> Chartered Accountants, G-4, Diamond Towers, <br /> <br /> Comp. App (AT) (CH) No. 143/2025 Page <b>1</b> of <b>4</b> <br /> <br /><br /> S.D. Road, Secunderabad - 500003, <br /> Telangana, India. <b>….Respondent No. 5 </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>CA. S. Vineeth </b><br /> Add: Sekhar & Suresh, <br /> Chartered Accountants, 133/4, Rashtrapathi Road, <br /> Secunderabad – 500003, Telangana, India <b>….Respondent No. 6</b> <br /> <b> </b><br /> <br /> <b>Present: </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> For Appellants : <b> </b> Mr. E. Om Prakash, Senior Advocate <br /> For Ms. R. Moneshaa, Advocate <br /> For Respondents : Mr. Y. Suryanarayana, Advocate for R2 & R4 <br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>ORDER </b><br /> <b>(Hybrid Mode) </b><br /> <b>02.04.2026: </b><br /> <b>[Oral Judgment: Justice Ashok Bhushan, (Chairperson)] </b><br /> Heard Ld. Counsel for the Appellant and Ld. Counsel for the Respondents, <br /> this appeal has been filed against the order dated 01.08.2025, passed by NCLT, <br /> Hyderabad Bench Court Hall No. II in I.A.NO. 199/2025. On I.A.NO. 199/2025 <br /> NCLT passed following order: <br /> <i>"This application has been moved by the Applicant praying </i><br /> <i>for stay of an EGM scheduled to be held on 07.08.2025. Any </i><br /> <i>decision taken will be subject to the outcome of the main </i><br /> <i>Company Petition. Accordingly, this application is disposed </i><br /> <i>of." </i><br /> <br /> <br /> 2. Appellant aggrieved by the order has come up in this appeal, it is <br /> submitted that in the same company petition earlier, the order were passed by <br /> NCLAT on 03.07.2025 & 04.07.2025. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent submits <br /> <br /> Comp. App (AT) (CH) No. 143/2025 Page <b>2</b> of <b>4</b> <br /> <br /><br /> that the order dated 04.07.2025 was passed not in the present company petition <br /> but on a different company petition. It is submitted that on 03.07.2025 order was <br /> passed in present company petition. The submission is that the EGM was going <br /> to held on 07.08.2025 is respect to which C.A.NO. 199/2025 was filed, various <br /> reliefs has been prayed by the Applicant. The Ld. Adjudicating Authority passed <br /> the impugned order, observing that "any decision taken will be subject to the <br /> outcome of the main company petition". The submission is that none of the <br /> prayers made were considered and Applicant was also in view of the above order, <br /> precluded to file a fresh application challenging the outcome of EGM, which took <br /> place on 07.08.2025. <br /> 3. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent submitted that with respect to the <br /> AGM held on 07.08.2025 the DIR-12 has already been registered under the <br /> directions of the Regional Directors. <br /> 4. After having heard the Ld. Counsel for the parties and perusing the <br /> records we are of the view that, in the ends of justice be served by giving liberty <br /> to the Appellant to file a fresh application with respect to the EGM which had <br /> taken place on 07.01.2025, With respect to the decision taken in the EGM <br /> 07.08.2025, if Appellant feels itself aggrieved by any of the decision, the <br /> impugned order passed on 01.08.2025 shall not in any manner preclude the <br /> Appellant to pursue any such application and Ld. NCLT shall consider the <br /> <br /> Comp. App (AT) (CH) No. 143/2025 Page <b>3</b> of <b>4</b> <br /> <br /><br /> application and decide the same in according with law without being influenced <br /> by any observation made in the order 01.08.2025. <br /> With the aforesaid liberty, the company appeal is disposed of. <br /> <br /> <br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>[Justice Ashok Bhushan] </b><br /> <b>(Chairperson) </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>[Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma] </b><br /> <b>Member (Judicial) </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b> </b><br /> <b>[Jatindranath Swain] </b><br /> <b>Member (Technical) </b><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> YS/MS/AK <br /> <br /> <br /> Comp. App (AT) (CH) No. 143/2025 Page <b>4</b> of <b>4</b> <br /> </div>