XYZ (VICTIM) SINCE MINOR THRO, HER MOTHER vs STATE OF GUJARAT

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 15802 of 2026

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:


HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

==========================================================
Approved for Reporting Yes No
==========================================================
XYZ (VICTIM) SINCE MINOR THRO, HER MOTHER
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS DIPMALA S DESAI(6596) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MR. ADITYA JADEJA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

Date : 02/11/2026

JUDGMENT
1. The captioned petition is preferred under Article 14, 21, 226 &
227 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs:-
A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to admit and
allow this Petition;
B) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue
appropriate writ, order or direction, permitting the
victim-petitioner to terminate her ongoing pregnancy
of 25 weeks 3 days as reported on 28.10.2026 at
respondent no.3 i.e. the In-charge Medical Officer,
Page 1 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
GG Hospital, Jamnagar or any other Government
Hospital on such terms and conditions as may be
deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court, with due care and
precaution after carrying out necessary medical
check-up, so as to avoid any likelihood of untoward
harm to the physical or mental health of the minor
victim, in the interest of justice;
C) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to direct the
respondent no.3 i.e. the In-charge Medical Officer of
the GG Hospital, Jamnagar or any other Government
Hospital to undertake necessary medical tests of
victim/petitioner about physical and medical fitness
to undergo termination of pregnancy as required
under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act,
1971, and to submit the report thereof to this
Hon'ble Court with immediate effect for its subjective
satisfaction;
D) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to direct the
respondent no.3 i.e. the In-charge Medical Officer of
the GG Hospital, Jamnagar or any other Government
Hospital to undertake necessary medical tests of
victim/petitioner about physical and medical fitness
to undergo termination of pregnancy as required
under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act,
1971 and to submit the report thereof to this Hon'ble
Courtwith immediate effect for its subjective
satisfaction, pending the admission, hearing and final
disposal of this petition;
Page 2 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
E) further be pleased to direct the respondent no. 3 to
hand over, in scientific manner, the tissues drawn
from the fetus for DNA identification to the
Respondent No.2-Police Inspector, Devbhoomi
Dwarka for onward transmission of the same to the
concerned Forensic Science Laboratory, interest of
justice;
F) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to grant such other
and further reliefs, as may be deemed fit by this
Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice;
2. The instant matter was earlier listed before this Court on
30.10.2026, whereby this Court passed necessary directions to
constitute a medical board, to get examined the witness, and to file its
opinion by way of a report to this Court, as to whether MTP is possible
in the facts and circumstances of this case. Today, the I.O. has placed
the report of Medical Board on record, wherein the Medical Board has
opined as under:-
“After History with clinical examination and ultrasound
examination, victim (daughter of Havaben) age 12 years and 7
month is found to have single live intrauterine fetus of 25weeks
1 day (as per Above ultrasound report dated 31-10-2026 done
by Dr.Rutvik Koyani (Senior resident, DMRD). Above mentioned
panel of doctors have examined the patient and she is
considered to be fit for MTP. We are of opinion that if she
undergoes MTP procedure at this gestational age certain
complications may occur, few of them we mention here are
hemorrhage, cervical injury, perineal injury, retained tissue bits,
post abortal infection.. If she requires surgical procedure she
Page 3 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
may have serious complications like uterine rupture, uterine
bleeding, post-abortal infections and in delayed complication it
also includes infertility. Rare life threatening complications
include DIC & amniotic fluid embolism. Time taken for MTP
increases with increasing gestational age which negatively
impacts on victim's psychology. Uncontrolled hemorrhage may
require hysterectomy, the frequency of which increases with
increasing weeks of pregnancy.
If MTP is considered then it should be performed without delay
to avoid major complications and other adverse effects like
negative impact on her mental, social, physical conditions
XXXXXX
. According to psychiatrist currently No major active sign
& symptoms of major psychiatric illness at present.
. Counseling with social worker.
. Follow up after 10 days in Psychiatric OPD.
XXXXXX
. As this patient is having tachycardia (Pulse rate-110/min),
moderate degree anemia (Hb -9.5 gm/dl).This patient will
be anesthetized under ASA grade 2 for risk of anesthesia
for the surgery.
. Kindly keep blood and blood products ready, if any surgical
interventions has to be done.
. This patient will be reassessed on the day of surgery.
XXXXXX
. At present on clinical & physical examination, no major
illness or abnormality found, so patient is medically
fit for procedure.”
Page 4 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
3. The aforesaid report is also shown to the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner. Notwithstanding the fact that some
complications may occur, after perusing the report, learned counsel for
the petitioner submitted across the bar that the victim and her parents
does not wish to proceed with the pregnancy.
4. It emerges from the records that the petitioner herein is the
victim of rape and aggravated penetrative sexual assault. The FIR was
registered at Okha Marine Police Station, Dist. Devbhumi Dwarka under
Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 65(1) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023 read
with Sections 4, 6 & 12 of POCSO Act. The complainant is the mother of
the victim.
5. Learned counsel, Mr. Darshan Dave appearing with Ms. Deepmala
Desai, learned counsel for the petitioner, had prayed for termination of
the petitioner’s ongoing pregnancy. He had placed reliance upon the
recent judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of S
vs. The Union of India & Ors., SLP (C) No. 14454/2026, decided
th
on 24 April, 2026 , wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court has observed as
under:-
“xxx xxx xxx
11. The Court must, while exercising jurisdiction
under Article 226 or Article 32 of the Constitution of
India, therefore, prioritize the best interests of the
minor mother-to- be in the present case, over the
procedural and statutory limitations under the MTP Act.
If the interest and welfare of the mother-to-be are to
be given due consideration, her reproductive autonomy
must be accorded the highest importance. This is
particularly having regard to the facts and
Page 5 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
circumstances of the present case.
11.1 The right to make decisions concerning one’s
body, particularly in matters of reproduction, is an
integral facet of personal liberty and privacy under
Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This right cannot
be rendered ineffective by imposing unreasonable
restrictions, especially in cases involving minors and
unwanted pregnancies, such as in the instant case.
11.2 No court ought to compel any woman and
more so a minor child, to carry a pregnancy to full term
against her express will. Such compulsion would not
only disregard her decisional autonomy but could also
inflict grave mental, emotional and physical trauma in
case she is compelled to give birth. In these
circumstances, denying the relief sought would compel
the minor to endure irreversible consequences. Such
an approach would be contrary to the constitutional
ethos and the settled principles recognizing
reproductive choice as a fundamental right. What is of
relevance is the choice of the pregnant woman rather
than the interest of an unborn child. It is easy to say
that if the pregnant woman is not interested in raising
the child, she may give away the child in adoption and
therefore must be compelled into giving birth to the
child. However, that cannot be the correct approach,
particularly, in cases where the child to be born is
unwanted. In such a situation, directing the pregnant
woman to give birth to the child against her wishes and
to forcefully continue her pregnancy would negate the
welfare of the pregnant woman and make it
subordinate to the child yet to be born.
11.3 We find that in cases of unwanted pregnancy,
often the decision to terminate is made beyond the
Page 6 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
statutory period prescribed under the MTP Act owing to
several reasons. It is under such circumstances that
Constitutional Courts must weigh the circumstances in
which a case in relation to the welfare of the pregnant
woman has to be considered rather than the child to
be born. In fact, under certain grounds, the MTP Act
itself permits termination of pregnancy which is
therefore recognised in law. The Constitutional Court is
approached only when the statutory remedy is not
available to a party. Can the Constitutional Court then
say that since the statutory remedy is not available, no
constitutional remedy would be available. That, in our
view, cannot be the approach. A lack of remedy under
a statute does not bar a constitutional remedy. The
statute codifies a part of the constitutional remedy. If a
case is not covered within the four corners of a statute
then, can the constitutional relief be also denied? In
our view, in such circumstances, the Constitutional
Court ought to weigh all facts and circumstances from
the lens of the party who intends to terminate the
pregnancy and is willing to undertake the medical risk,
rather than compelling her to complete the pregnancy
term and give birth to an unwanted child. If the
pregnant woman carrying an unwanted pregnancy is
compelled to continue such a pregnancy, then the
constitutional rights of the pregnant woman would be
breached.
1.4 Further, if the Constitutional Court adopts the
view that even an unwanted pregnancy must be
continued, then instead of approaching the Court for
permission, pregnant women would visit illegal
abortion centres and secretly undergo termination of
such pregnancies which would only make such women
more vulnerable and expose them to more dangerous
procedures. It is under such considerations that a
Page 7 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
Constitutional Court must decide what is best in the
interest of the pregnant woman, particularly, when the
pregnancy is unwanted as in the present case.
12. It is necessary to revisit the facts in the
present case. The appellant’s daughter is herself a
minor girl of fifteen years. The pregnancy is an
unwanted pregnancy which is outside the wedlock and
continuing the pregnancy is not in the interest of the
pregnant minor particularly when she has attempted to
foreclose her life on two occasions. The minor is willing
to undergo the medical risk of a termination of
pregnancy. The termination of pregnancy would be
bearing in mind the long term social, economic and
emotional interest of the pregnant minor.
13. Further, the mental health of a pregnant
woman carrying an unwanted pregnancy also must be
borne in mind and given its due importance. If she is
forced to continue her pregnancy and give birth the
consequences would be adverse. An unwanted
pregnancy and the effect thereof on the mindset of
such a pregnant woman will also have a bearing on the
child to be born. The decision not to continue a
pregnancy and to seek termination with all attendant
risks must be respected rather than compelling such a
pregnant woman to continue such a pregnancy.
14. We may usefully refer to a three-Judge Bench
judgment of this Court in X v. Health & Family Welfare
Department, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1321, wherein it has
been authoritatively held that a woman’s right to
reproductive autonomy includes the right to choose
whether and when to have children, the number of
children to have, and the right to access safe and legal
abortion and reproductive healthcare. This Court
Page 8 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
recognized that the decision to continue or terminate a
pregnancy arises out of complex and deeply personal
circumstances, which only the woman herself is best
placed to evaluate. Reproductive autonomy, therefore,
necessarily entails that every pregnant woman has the
intrinsic right to decide whether to undergo an
abortion. Importantly, this Court also observed that a
mere clinical description of pregnancy cannot capture
the profound physical and psychological consequences
of forcing a woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy to
term. Consequently, the decision to either continue or
terminate a pregnancy is firmly rooted in the woman’s
right to bodily integrity and decisional autonomy, which
are integral facets of her fundamental rights under
Article 21 of the Constitution.
14.1 In the context of the present case, we may refer
to the decision of A (Mother of X) v. State of
Maharashtra & Others in Civil Appeal No.827 of 2026,
where, on similar facts, this Court had allowed medical
termination of pregnancy of 30 weeks of a minor girl.
In that case too, the pregnancy in question arose out
of a consensual relationship, and much like the present
case, the continuation of the pregnancy was stated to
be traumatic
both mentally as well as physically to the minor girl as
it was an unwanted pregnancy.
15. Thus, what is relevant is whether the pregnant
woma intends to give birth to a child or not. In the
instant case, the facts of the case reveal that the minor
girl intends not to give birth.
15.1 Keeping that in view, when Constitutional Courts
are approached by unintending mothers seeking
termination of pregnancy, they ought not take a
Page 9 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
prohibitory approach. The consequence of such an
approach will not be the cessation of late-term
terminations, which will happen anyway, but only their
displacement outside the law. Pregnant women may be
driven to seek termination through unregulated means,
often at a greater risk to their life and health. Thus, the
unintended consequence of judicial reluctance to
permit termination beyond the statutory period
reinforces the very conditions that the MTP Act seeks
to avoid, namely unsafe abortions.
15.2 Moreover, the invocation of foetal normalcy or the
fact that the pregnancy has been carried for a
considerable duration as grounds to deny termination is
of no constitutional persuasiveness. These arguments
proceed on the assumptions: first, that in the absence
fetal abnormality, the continuation of pregnancy is
unobjectionable, and second, that the passage of time
extinguishes the pregnant woman’s claim to decisional
autonomy.
15.3 We wish to lay to rest both the above arguments.
Firstly, to predicate access to termination on the
existence of foetal anomaly is to make the exercise of a
fundamental
right over one’s body contingent upon pathology of the
fetus, which is not in the hands of the unintending
mother. In other words, her rights are subordinated to
the condition of the fetus over which she has no
control. As a matter of constitutional principle, this
cannot be allowed. Rights are not functions of
circumstance, they attach to humans for the reason
that they are free moral agents. To say that
termination of pregnancy is thinkable only in the
presence of foetal defect instrumentalises the pregnant
woman into a conduit who is required to sustain a
Page 10 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
pregnancy no matter her will. Secondly, the passage of
time does not extinguish the right to make
reproductive choices. This argument rests on the
untenable presumption that delay means acquiescence,
disregarding the manifold reasons that may account for
late presentation of pregnancy including but not limited
to delayed detection due to irregular menstrual cycles
or lack of reproductive awareness, limited access to
healthcare services, financial constraints that impede
timely medical consultation, and hesitation to disclose
a pregnancy coercion, abuse, or lack of familial
support: all of which may prevent earlier disclosure.
15.4 Constitutional courts cannot overlook that parties
approach them in such hard cases precisely because no
effective statutory right remains available. The absence
of a legal remedy under the MTP Act is the very reason
for the court’s jurisdiction being invoked in the first
instance. Therefore, to defer mechanically to statutory
limitations is to disregard the distinct role of the
Constitutional Court in protecting individual rights even
when no other statutory remedies exist. The effect of
such an approach is to render the fundamental right to
bodily autonomy nugatory.
xxxxxx-xxx”
6. This Court has considered the submissions advanced by the
learned counsel for the Petitioner and has also gone through the
material available on record. Considering the opinion of the Medical
Board, the wish of the victim and the consent of her parent, and having
regard to the ratio of the aforesaid judgment, I am of the view that the
best interest of the victim – girl is to be considered. Hence, the instant
petition deserves to be allowed and accordingly, this Court hereby
Page 11 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
allows the present petition and permits the medical termination of
pregnancy, keeping in mind the best interest of the minor, subject to
the safeguards and directions as detailed below:-
1. The Superintendent, GG Hospital, Jamnagar is directed to:
a) Obtain a written undertaking from the victim authorizing
her consent to conduct the procedure at her risk.
b) Upon receiving the undertaking, shall immediately
constitute a Medical Board comprising three senior-most
Gynecologists/Surgeons, along with a Physician,
Anesthetist, Radiologist, Pediatrician, and Psychologist, to
evaluate the victim's physical and mental health. They shall
explain to the victim as well as her guardian, about the
risks involved in terminating the pregnancy and also other
factors, such as surgical and clinical implications of
terminating a pregnancy at this stage, more particularly
considering the fact that the victim has crossed 24 weeks
of pregnancy.
c) Proceed with the procedure on an urgent basis with the
help of the afore experts, only upon a unanimous medical
opinion that the termination can be carried out safely
without endangering the life of the victim.
d) shall ensure that all necessary care and caution is taken by
the doctors while carrying out procedure for termination of
pregnancy. Provide all necessary medical infrastructure,
including reserving a dedicated special room for the victim
and her family, ensuring continuous psychological support
and counseling throughout her admission.
e) Preserve and seal requisite fetal tissue samples strictly in
Page 12 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
accordance with standard medical and scientific protocols
for DNA profiling, and hand them over to the Investigating
Officer for onward transmission to the Forensic Science
Laboratory (FSL).
f) Retain the victim in the hospital for all necessary post-
operative care and observation, discharging her only after
the Medical Board certifies that she is clinically stable, fully
recovered, and fit for discharge.
2. In the event of the infant being alive at birth, the Hospital
Authorities and State are directed to:
a) Extend immediate, state of the art intensive medical care
to the newborn, either within the hospital or by arranging
an immediate transfer to a specialized facility, ensuring all
measures are taken for the infant's health and survival.
b) If the victim declines to accept the child, the State and its
relevant child welfare authorities under the Juvenile Justice
(Care and Protection of Children) Act, should assume full
legal, physical and medical responsibility.
3. The Secretary, District Legal Service Authority is directed to:-
a) Take immediate statutory steps, in the event the family
refuses custody, to place the child under the care of a
recognized Specialized Adoption Agency in accordance with
the law and statutory adoption guidelines.
b) Process and disburse interim compensation to the minor
victim on a priority basis under the applicable Victim
Compensation Scheme upon receipt of the records from
the Investigating Officer, and take necessary measures for
Page 13 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
the expeditious release of the final compensation.
c) Formulate and supervise a long-term rehabilitation plan for
the victim, taking into account the trauma suffered, shall
offer counseling and ensure the provision of educational
support, vocational training, and ongoing psychosocial
assistance aligned with her wishes.
4. The Investigating Officer (I.O.) is directed to:
a) Receive the sealed fetal tissue samples from the hospital
authorities and promptly transmit them under proper chain
of custody to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) for
forensic DNA analysis.
b) Immediately transmit certified copies of the First
Information Report (FIR), case diary, and complete medical
records to the concerned DLSA to expedite the
determination and disbursal of victim compensation.
5. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health and Family
Welfare, Government of Gujarat, is directed to:
a) Provide immediate nutritional, travel, and incidental
medical requirements.
b) Bear all medical expenses incurred toward the termination
procedure, in-patient stay, medication, nutritional
requirements, and complete postpartum care for both the
victim and the child for a minimum period of six months.
7. A Copy of this judgment shall be provided to the learned APP for
onward transmission to the concerned I.O., concerned Hospital and
Page 14 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026

R/SCR.A/15802/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 02/11/2026
(GJHC240847292026)
other concerned departments, if any, for its compliance and for taking
appropriate action. A copy shall also be given to the learned counsel for
the petitioner; and further, the concerned hospital shall be also
intimated about this judgment through e-mail.
8. Direct service today is permitted.
(MOOL CHAND TYAGI, J)
ARUN
Page 15 of 15
Uploaded by ARUN B(HC02368) on Mon Nov 02 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 02 17:34:08 IST 2026