Facts
The claimant sustained multiple injuries in a road accident on 9 February 2024 involving a Maxi Cab Mini Bus.
Source reference: pp. 3–4, para. 3The MACT awarded him ₹7,57,590, including ₹6,41,520 for loss of future income, and applied an 18% whole-body disability assessment
Source reference: pp. 3–4, para. 3The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement
Source reference: p. 2The High Court considered the appeal with the insurer’s consent at the admission stage
Source reference: p. 2, para. 2Issues
1. Whether the Tribunal correctly assessed the claimant’s income and whole-body disability for calculating loss of future income
Source reference: pp. 4–6, paras. 6, 12–132. Whether the amounts awarded under the other compensation heads required enhancement in light of the claimant’s injuries and hospitalisation
Source reference: pp. 5–6, paras. 7–11Law Applied
Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides the statutory basis for an appeal against a MACT award
Source reference: p. 2In assessing compensation for permanent disability, the Court applied the principles that limb disability must be converted into whole-body disability—one-third of lower-limb disability and one-fourth of upper-limb disability—and that future prospects at 40% were applicable here because the assessed whole-body disability exceeded 20%
Source reference: p. 6, para. 12For income, the Court adopted the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority’s 2024 notional-income figure of ₹17,000 per month; it applied multiplier 18 based on the claimant’s age
Source reference: p. 4, para. 6Reasoning
The Court substituted the Tribunal’s monthly income of ₹16,500 with ₹17,000 and retained multiplier 18, given the claimant’s age.
Source reference: p. 4, para. 6It derived 22% whole-body disability from the doctor’s assessment of 46% disability to the lower limb and 28% to the upper limb, applying the stated limb-to-whole-body conversion, and added 40% future prospects.
Source reference: p. 6, paras. 12–13Applying those figures, it calculated future-income loss at ₹11,30,976.
Source reference: pp. 6–7, paras. 13–14It also increased pain and suffering to ₹1,00,000 and loss of amenities to ₹70,000, and adjusted attendant, conveyance, food and nourishment charges to ₹19,000 for 19 days’ hospitalisation.
Source reference: pp. 5–6, paras. 8–11It retained medical expenses at ₹11,570 and recalculated laid-up-period income at ₹51,000 for three months.
Source reference: pp. 5–7, paras. 8–14Holding
The appeal was allowed in part.
The Court enhanced the total compensation from ₹7,57,590 to ₹13,82,546, granting an additional ₹6,24,956 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realisation
Source reference: pp. 7–8, paras. 14–16The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest within six weeks; 50% was to be released to the claimant and 50% placed in a three-year fixed deposit
Source reference: p. 8, para. 16Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Motor Vehicles Act, 19881
Original Court PDF
SRI. PRAVEEN S.vsSRI. KANTHARAJU G. B.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
