HCHIGH COURT REPORT
Recent LawLens analyses from the High Court for Telangana.
LATEST JUDGMENTS · KEY HOLDINGS · COURT DEVELOPMENTS
PERMANENT MONTHLY EDITIONS
TELANGANA COURT REPORT
The lead edition has automatically moved to yesterday's report.
LEADYESTERDAY'S REPORT
The respondents’ residential houses and lands in Hathini Village were acquired for submergence under the P.P. Rao Project. Award No. B/628/2002 dated 26 May 2003 covered 532 structures and allegedly omitted statutory...
READ THE ANALYSIS
4 MIN READ→
![Under Section 37, appellate courts cannot reappraise evidence or disturb a reasoned award upheld under Section 34.. UNION OF INDIA [UOI],REP.BY CHIEF ENGINEER, BANGALORE. vs M/S PHOENIX ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS, SECBAD AND ANOTHER. Telangana High Court. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/under-section-37-appellate-courts-cannot-reappraise-evidence-or-disturb-a-reasoned-award-u-fcd29089a88349239e45073938ed6078.webp)
4 MIN READ→
The petitioners, accused Nos.1 to 4, sought quashing of proceedings in C.C. No.302 of 2020 pending before the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Devarakonda.
2 MIN READ→
The three writ petitions concerned the same lands measuring Ac.10-10 guntas in Sy. Nos. 362, 373 and 374 of Manchirevula Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
5 MIN READ→
The appellant, owner of the tractor, challenged the award dated 18 February 2008 in O.P. No. 315 of 2006, by which the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded ₹25,000 to the first respondent/claimant, fastened liabili...
3 MIN READ→
On 25 November 2008, A. Mallesh was riding his motorcycle towards Ghatkesar when a Honda Shine motorcycle, allegedly driven rashly and negligently at high speed, struck his vehicle from behind near Sri Harsha Super Ma...
2 MIN READ→