HCHIGH COURT REPORT
Recent LawLens analyses from the Jharkhand High Court.
LATEST JUDGMENTS · KEY HOLDINGS · COURT DEVELOPMENTS
PERMANENT MONTHLY EDITIONS
JHARKHAND COURT REPORT
The lead edition has automatically moved to yesterday's report.
LEADYESTERDAY'S REPORT
The petitioner, M/s Jin Mata Traders, challenged the order dated 08.10.2024 by which it was blacklisted for three years and its security deposit was forfeited in connection with failure to complete the supply of sugar...
READ THE ANALYSIS
3 MIN READ→
4 MIN READ→
3 MIN READ→
4 MIN READ→
3 MIN READ→
The appellant-husband and respondent-wife married on 11 June 2016 under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, and subsequently had a son.
3 MIN READ→
The parties married before the Marriage Officer, Ranchi, on 28 July 2011 and subsequently underwent a Hindu customary ceremony.
3 MIN READ→
The petitioner challenged the order dated 20 May 2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Giridih, in M.C.A. No. 2527 of 2025 arising out of S.T. Case No. 332 of 2025, Nimiyaghat P.S. Case No. 42 of 2007 and G...
3 MIN READ→
On 26 June 1998, a dispute arose when the goat belonging to Jageshwar Mahato allegedly grazed paddy seedlings belonging to the informant’s family. Following an altercation between the parties, several accused allegedl...
3 MIN READ→
The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions against alleged air and water pollution caused by industrial units operating in Ramgarh, particularly Bihar Foundry and Casting Limited and Dayal St...
4 MIN READ→
Deepak Tigga, while serving as Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner at SRO, Bhagalpur, conducted proceedings under Section 7C of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, concerning Katih...
4 MIN READ→
The appellant and Sunny Murmu had been living together as husband and wife for approximately two years following a love relationship.
3 MIN READ→
The petition was filed by 73 petitioners before the High Court of Jharkhand against the State of Jharkhand and other respondents.
1 MIN READ→
The petitioners, owners of certain land, entered into an agreement for sale with Opposite Party No. 2, M/s. Apcon Homes Private Limited, which paid an advance of ₹1,47,50,000. After commencing development work, includ...
3 MIN READ→