HCHIGH COURT REPORT
Recent LawLens analyses from the Rajasthan High Court and its benches.
LATEST JUDGMENTS · KEY HOLDINGS · COURT DEVELOPMENTS
RAJASTHAN COURT REPORT
Rajasthan High Court
Outsider transfers of Gadia Lohar welfare plots declared void; Rajasthan HC orders inquiry into all 184 plots
RAJESH SINGH SISODIA vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN
LEADTODAY'S REPORT
The State of Rajasthan implemented the Keer Kheda Gadia Lohar Yojana around 2005 to rehabilitate members of the Gadia Lohar community.
READ THE ANALYSISRajasthan High Court
75% Pre-Deposit Under MSME Act Not Required Simultaneously With Challenge; Courts Can Grant Time For Compliance
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (MM), vs M/S ANAMIKA CONDUCTORS PVT. LTD.
The respondent (Supplier) initiated recovery proceedings against the appellant (Buyer/Public Sector Utility) under Section 18(1) of the MSME Act, 2006. After conciliation failed, the Facilitation Council initiated arb...
3 MIN READ→
Rajasthan High Court
Procedural amendments rectifying inadvertent clerical omissions without altering the suit's character are permissible under supervisory jurisdiction.
LRS OF MR. BHARAT LAKHANI vs VIKAS GARG
The respondent-landlord instituted eviction proceedings against the petitioners (legal representatives of the deceased tenant Bharat Lakhani) under the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 before the Senior Civil Judge (R...
4 MIN READ→
Rajasthan High Court
Acquisition proceedings against a deceased person are valid if legal heirs participated without prejudice.
SMT.GOPI BAI vs STATE
The State of Rajasthan initiated land acquisition proceedings for the expansion of the residential area of Municipal Board, Lakheri, by issuing a notification under Section 4 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 195...
3 MIN READ→
Rajasthan High Court
Land acquisition under the 1894 Act lapses under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession remains with the owner and compensation is unpaid.
GAURAV MISHRA S/O LATE SHRI OM PRAKASH MISHRA vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN
The petitioner’s parents purchased land in Khasra Nos. 724 & 725, Village Nausar, Ajmer via registered sale deed in 1978
3 MIN READ→
Rajasthan High Court
Disputed factual allegations regarding non-supply of documents cannot be adjudicated under Section 482 to quash Section 276CC prosecutions.
BABLOO SHARMA ALIAS PRAMOD SHARMA S/O SHRI HANUMAN SAHAI, vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN
A search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was conducted on 18.11.2010 at the business and residential premises of M/s Gold Sukh Trade India Limited and its Directors, including the petitioner.
3 MIN READ→