HCHIGH COURT REPORT

Madras High Court

Recent LawLens analyses from the Madras High Court and Madurai Bench.

LATEST JUDGMENTS · KEY HOLDINGS · COURT DEVELOPMENTS

MADRAS COURT REPORT

Yesterday

No new analysis from this court today.

The lead edition has automatically moved to yesterday's report.

LEADYESTERDAY'S REPORT

A partition suit is untenable when it omits joint family properties and necessary co-sharers.

The plaintiff, Manikandan, claimed a half share in certain ancestral/joint-family properties allotted to his father, the first defendant, under a registered partition deed dated 27 April 1984.

Madras High Court5 MIN READ
READ THE ANALYSIS

The Archive

57 ANALYSES · NEWEST FIRST

Madras High Court·

Writ Petitions Challenging Pay Fixation Instructions Dismissed Based on Significant Delay and Laches

The Petitioners, retired government employees who exited service on various dates between 2012 and 2017, filed writ petitions seeking a re-fixation of their pay in the Selection Grade/Special Grade.

2 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Workmen Must Prove Lack of Gainful Employment to Claim Backwages Upon Reinstatement

The appellants, employees of the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, Veerakeralam, challenged their service termination under Section 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

2 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Improper OMR Shading Leads to Automatic Rejection; Judicial Interference in Automated Evaluation Would 'Open a Pandora’s Box' in Public Exams

The appellant, a candidate in a recruitment examination conducted by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC), challenged the selection list dated 05.05.2025.

2 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Executing Court cannot dismiss a third-party obstruction petition at the SR stage without adjudicating independent title.

The petitioner filed an application under Order XXI Rule 97 of the CPC to obstruct the execution of a decree obtained by the respondents in 2006 regarding property in Survey Nos. 13/1A and 14 of Kolathur Village.

2 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Adequacy of consideration and continuous readiness established through major advance payment warrant a decree for specific performance.

The Plaintiff (Respondent) filed a suit for specific performance based on a registered sale agreement dated 17.06.1998 for agricultural land

2 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Promoter must pay ₹10 lakh for selling plot to third party after taking payment from buyer; Madras High Court upholds RERA compensation order

The Appellant (Promoter) entered into an agreement with the 1st Respondent on 18.10.2019 for the sale of a residential plot for Rs. 1,02,25,000/-.

2 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Acquisition of Mandatory Teacher Eligibility Test Qualification Merits Reconsideration of Service Benefits by Department

The State (Appellants) filed a writ appeal challenging a previous order dated 13.11.2024 passed in W.P. No. 5180 of 2020.

2 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Encroachers Cannot Seek Certiorari Against Removal Notices Without Timely Representation Under the Tamil Nadu Highways Act.

The petitioners, who operate various small-scale businesses (nursery garden, fruit shops, fast food, etc.) abutting the highways in Pudukkottai District, filed writ petitions seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus...

2 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Registrars cannot tax Power of Attorney as 'Conveyance' if subsequent sales are also taxable; demand for deficit stamp duty must be issued within 3 years.

The respondent (writ petitioner) was granted a power of attorney (POA) by one T.G. Ponurathinam to develop and alienate specific portions of a property

2 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Dismissal of Motor Accident Appeal for Continued Non-Prosecution and Absence of Representation

The appellants (K. Thangapandy and two minors) filed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the award dated 20.10.2000 passed in M.C.O.P.No.232 of 1998 by the I Additional Dis...

1 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Public Appointments To Victims Of Tragedies Dehors Service Rules Violate Articles 14 And 16 OF The Constitution

Three Public Interest Litigations (PILs) were filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus to restrain the Government of Tamil Nadu from granting public employment to the next of kin of 41 victims of the "Karur stampede"

2 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Unregistered compromise decree declaring pre-existing rights in suit properties does not require compulsory registration.

The suit properties originally belonged to Kanniappa Naicker, who died in 1940. His wife, Ellammal (died 1955), executed a settlement deed in 1940 in favour of her brother, Subramania Naicker (predecessor of the Plain...

3 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Registration of Sale Agreement as Loan Security Does Not Mandate Specific Performance if Not Intended for Sale

The Plaintiff (Respondent 1) filed a suit for specific performance based on a registered Sale Agreement dated Sept 9, 2015 (Ex-A.2) for property worth Rs. 12,00,000, having paid Rs. 10,00,000 as advance.

3 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Writ Jurisdictions Under Article 226 Are Not Maintainable Against Private Sector Banks for Contractual Employment Disputes

The Appellants, former employees of private sector banks (ICICI Bank and Lakshmi Vilas Bank), challenged orders dismissing their writ petitions.

2 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Unregistered Will leaving behind immediate legal heirs is invalid if suspicious circumstances remain undispelled.

The Appellant (Plaintiff) filed a suit for partition seeking a 2/3rd share in properties originally owned by his father, Chinnappa Gounder, who died intestate in 1982.

2 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Substantial compliance with directions to furnish Provident Fund statements necessitates closure of contempt proceedings.

The petitioner, S. Ulaganathan, filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act against officials of N.L.C. Limited and the Assistant PF Commissioner (EPFO).

2 MIN READ

Madras High Court·

Permission to file reply statement cannot be granted after closure of evidence without justifying the delay.

The petitioner (plaintiff) filed a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction based on a 2005 sale agreement for property valued at Rs. 7,00,000/-.

2 MIN READ