Madras High CourtCivil Procedure and EvidenceIntellectual Property Law

Apex Laboratories And Medifame Resolve ARK/AR-KD Branding Suit Through Madras HC Compromise Decree

Apex Laboratories Pvt Ltdv.Medifame Biotech

Apex Laboratories And Medifame Resolve ARK/AR-KD Branding Suit Through Madras HC Compromise Decree. Apex Laboratories Pvt Ltd vs Medifame Biotech. Madras High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the Court should pass a decree in the terms of the parties’ Memorandum of Compromise dated 26 September 2026

The court held

The Court decreed the suit in terms of the joint Memorandum of Compromise dated 26 September 2026, making it part of the decree.

It also directed

No costs were awarded, and the connected applications were closed.

01Facts

Apex Laboratories sued Medifame Biotech alleging infringement of its registered trademark “ARK PAIN RELIEF SPRAY” and copyright infringement concerning the colour scheme, get-up and layout of the defendant’s packaging

The parties informed the Court that they had entered into a Memorandum of Compromise dated 26 September 2026 and requested a decree in its terms.

¶ 1 · ¶ 2

The memorandum, signed by the plaintiff’s authorised signatory and the defendant’s proprietor, with both counsel joining in its execution, was presented to the Court.

¶ 2

02Issues

i.1. Whether the Court should pass a decree in the terms of the parties’ Memorandum of Compromise dated 26 September 2026

¶ 1 · ¶ 2

ii.2. Whether any consequential orders were required concerning costs and the connected applications

¶ 3

03Law Applied

The judgment does not identify or apply any specific statutory provision, legal test or precedent.

It proceeds on the procedural basis that the Court may decree the suit in accordance with a compromise presented by the parties and accepted by the Court

¶ 2 · ¶ 3

04Reasoning

The Court recorded that the compromise was in writing, signed by the plaintiff’s authorised signatory and the defendant’s proprietor, and executed with the participation of counsel for both sides.

¶ 2

As both parties sought a decree in its terms and the original memorandum was presented for approval, the Court gave effect to their settlement by incorporating it into the decree.

¶ 2 · ¶ 3

No separate determination of the trademark or copyright allegations was made.

05Holding

The Court decreed the suit in terms of the joint Memorandum of Compromise dated 26 September 2026, making it part of the decree.

¶ 3

No costs were awarded, and the connected applications were closed.

¶ 3
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

Apex Laboratories Pvt LtdvsMedifame Biotech

Madras High Court · October 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment