01Facts
The appellants were among 19 persons convicted by the Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of SC/ST Cases, Tiruppur, in S.C. No. 178 of 2025.
pp. 3–5, 7The prosecution case was that they were Bangladeshi nationals who had entered and remained in India without valid travel documents; three appellants were also found with forged Aadhaar and PAN cards.
pp. 3–5, 7The trial court convicted the appellants under Section 14A of the Foreigners Act, 1946, and convicted three of them additionally under Sections 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).
pp. 3–5, 7It imposed two years’ simple imprisonment and fines, with sentences to run concurrently.
pp. 3–5, 7The appellants’ appeal under Section 415(2) of the BNSS principally challenged the sentence, not the finding of guilt; they sought credit for their time in custody and reduction of sentence.
pp. 2, 5–602Issues
i.1. Whether the sentences imposed by the trial court warranted reduction, particularly in light of the appellants’ period of custody
pp. 5–7ii.2. Whether directions should be issued to ensure the appellants’ deportation to Bangladesh after completion of their sentences
p. 803Law Applied
The appeal was brought under Section 415(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS).
p. 2The convictions and sentences concerned Section 14A of the Foreigners Act, 1946, and, for three appellants, Sections 336(3) and 340(2) of the BNS.
pp. 3–4, 7The Court treated the imprisonment imposed as the minimum sentence for the Foreigners Act offence and found no infirmity in the sentences imposed for the offences.
p. 7On deportation, it referred to the Supreme Court’s observations in M/s. Maja Daruwala and another v. State of West Bengal, reported as 2025 Law Finder SC 4783, and directed the authorities to take appropriate action to deport the appellants after they had served their sentences.
p. 8Provisions in the judgment · 7 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 258Section 415
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 336Section 340Section 343
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 207Section 313
04Reasoning
The Court noted that the prosecution had established the appellants’ Bangladeshi nationality and their lack of valid travel documents, and that the conviction was not challenged in the appeal.
pp. 5–6It held that the trial court had imposed the minimum imprisonment for the Foreigners Act offence and found no basis to interfere with the substantive sentences, including those imposed for the BNS offences.
p. 7It nevertheless reduced the default imprisonment for non-payment of fines to three days’ simple imprisonment for each offence.
p. 7Having regard to the Supreme Court observations cited, it also directed the authorities to arrange deportation following completion of the sentences.
p. 805Holding
The appeal was dismissed, subject to reduction of the default sentence for non-payment of fines to three days’ simple imprisonment for each offence.
pp. 7–9The authorities were directed to take appropriate action to deport the appellants to Bangladesh within 30 days after they had undergone their sentences.
pp. 7–9Original Court PDF
SalimvsState rep by the Inspector of Police
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
