Facts
Selvaraj filed O.S. No. 610 of 2020 seeking partition of the suit properties.
Source reference: no citationAfter his death, his mother was transposed as plaintiff.
Source reference: no citationThe parties entered into a compromise before the Lok Adalat, which passed an award on 18 February 2022; the award was registered as Document No. 2368 of 2022 on 7 March 2022.
Source reference: p. 4The revision petitioners claimed rights in the properties and alleged that the suit and compromise concealed prior dealings and transfers to third parties, whose rights were thereby affected without their participation.
Source reference: pp. 4–6They challenged the award under Article 227 of the Constitution.
Source reference: p. 4Issues
Whether the revisions under Article 227 were maintainable to challenge the Lok Adalat award.
Source reference: p. 4Whether the award should be set aside on the ground that the compromise was obtained through a collusive suit that concealed existing third-party rights.
Source reference: pp. 4–6Whether the suit should be remitted for further proceedings, and on what terms.
Source reference: pp. 6–7Law Applied
The Court stated that a Lok Adalat award may be challenged only by a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, relying on Dilip Mehta v. Rakesh Gupta and others, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2737.
Source reference: p. 4The judgment identifies no further statutory provision or legal test; it proceeds on the principle that an award procured through fraud or concealment of material facts, in circumstances affecting existing third-party rights, cannot stand.
Source reference: pp. 5–6Reasoning
The Court found that the petitioners had placed overwhelming material showing that the suit properties had already been dealt with and that third-party rights had arisen before the compromise.
Source reference: pp. 5–6The contesting respondents provided no explanation for compromising the suit without addressing those rights, and their counsel indicated that they had no further instructions.
Source reference: pp. 5–6In those circumstances, the Court held the award and its registration illegal and non est.
Source reference: pp. 6–7It also concluded that any continuation of the suit required the participation of all necessary parties.
Source reference: pp. 6–7Holding
The Court allowed all three revisions and set aside the Lok Adalat award dated 18 February 2022 and its registration as Document No. 2368 of 2022.
The Court remitted O.S. No. 610 of 2020 to the IV Additional District Court, Coimbatore.
Source reference: pp. 6–7Any party wishing to contest the suit must take steps to implead all necessary parties within eight weeks of receiving the order; otherwise, the trial court must close the suit for non-prosecution.
Source reference: pp. 6–7No costs were ordered, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
Source reference: p. 7Original Court PDF
KANAGAMANIvsSELVARAJ (DECEASED) 1. Mylathal,
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
