Karnataka High Court
Family LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

A matrimonial settlement may support dissolution of marriage by mutual consent in appeal.

SMT. M R JYOTHI vs SRI. C NAVEEN KUMAR

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 23, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
A matrimonial settlement may support dissolution of marriage by mutual consent in appeal.. SMT. M R JYOTHI vs SRI. C NAVEEN KUMAR. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The wife appealed the Family Court’s decree granting the husband a divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Source reference: pp. 2–4

In a connected appeal, she challenged dismissal of her petition for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of that Act.

Source reference: pp. 2–4

During the appeals, the parties reached a settlement and filed a joint memo.

Source reference: pp. 4–7

The husband paid the wife ₹20,00,000 by demand draft in court.

Source reference: pp. 4–7

The settlement also provided for the child’s permanent custody with the mother and visitation for the father, and contemplated resolution of other matrimonial proceedings.

Source reference: pp. 4–7
02

Issues

1. Whether the appeals should be disposed of in accordance with the parties’ settlement, including by setting aside the Family Court’s decrees.

Source reference: pp. 4, 7

2. Whether the marriage should be dissolved by mutual consent and the agreed arrangements recorded.

Source reference: pp. 6–7
03

Law Applied

The appeals were brought under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984; the underlying Family Court proceedings concerned Sections 13(1)(ia) and 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Source reference: pp. 2–3

Its stated basis for disposing of them was the parties’ amicable settlement, confirmed voluntarily in court, and the court’s acceptance of the joint memo.

Source reference: pp. 4, 7
04

Reasoning

The parties appeared before the Court and confirmed that they had read and understood the settlement and entered it freely.

Source reference: pp. 6–7

The Court also recorded that the husband had handed over the agreed ₹20,00,000 demand draft to the wife during the proceedings.

Source reference: pp. 6–7

In light of the settlement, which addressed the parties’ financial claims and the child’s custody and visitation, the Court set aside the Family Court’s judgment and decree and dissolved the marriage by mutual consent.

Source reference: p. 7

The settlement contemplated steps to end other proceedings in accordance with law; the order does not itself dispose of those separately pending cases.

Source reference: pp. 5–7
05

Holding

The Court disposed of both appeals, set aside the Family Court’s judgment and decree in the connected proceedings, and dissolved the marriage by mutual consent.

It directed the Registry to draw the decree accordingly and disposed of any pending interlocutory applications.

Source reference: p. 7
06

Acts & Sections Cited

3 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Family Courts Act, 19841

Hindu Marriage Act, 19552

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT. M R JYOTHIvsSRI. C NAVEEN KUMAR

Karnataka High Court · September 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment